Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Pencabulan dan Persetubuhan Udin Nurkholis Huda; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1340

Abstract

The crime of molestation and sexual intercourse against children is an act that violates social norms of politeness, religion and decency. Article 28b paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia reads: "Every child has the right to survival, growth, and development and has the right to protection from violence and discrimination" The legal issue of this normative legal research: How is the criminal act of molestation and sexual intercourse against children regulated? What is the form of legal protection for children as victims of sexual acts and sexual intercourse? The crime of molestation is regulated in Articles 289 to 295 of the Criminal Code, Law No. 35 of 2014: It is an amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, which affirms the prohibition of violence or threats against children (Article 76E) and establishes prison sanctions of between 5 to 15 years for perpetrators (Article 82) and Law No. 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence. The form of legal protection for children as victims of criminal acts of molestation and sexual intercourse is Physical and Psychological Protection, Victims' children have the right to physical protection to ensure safety from the threat of the perpetrator, through the arrest of the perpetrator with sufficient preliminary evidence. Psychological protection is provided with rehabilitation, counseling, and psychosocial assistance during the legal process until recovery. 2. Confidentiality of the identity of the victim; 3. Legal and Social Assistance; 4. Restitution and Restoration of Rights; 5. Strict Law Enforcement.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK SEBAGAI SAKSI KORBAN DALAM KASUS PENCABULAN Arif Fidiansyah; Noenik Soekorini; Fitri Ayuningtyas
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9889

Abstract

Bagi anak yang terlibat dalam proses peradilan pidana, di mana anak menjadi saksi korban kejahatan, maka apa yang dialami anak baik dari segi mental dan jiwa terkadang belum mampu menerima. Selain itu adanya kemungkinan pembalasan dari pihak pelaku kejahatan serta kedudukan saksi korban yang sangat rentan, sehingga tidak menutup kemungkinan terjadi perubahan berawal sebagai saksi akan tetapi bisa menjadi pelaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada serta literatur terkait. Hasil penilitian menunjukan bahwa Mengenai pengaturan hukum dalam pembuktian keterangan saksi korban anak dalam tindak pidana pencabulan ialah keterangan saksi korban anak tidak mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian atau tidak mempunyai nilai pembuktian, meskipun saksi korban anak memenuhi syarat materil sebagai mana disebutkan dalam Pasal 1 angka 27 KUHAP yaitu saksi korban tersebut melihat sendiri, mengalami sendiri dan mendengar sendiri serta keterangan tersebut diberikan dalam dipersidangan dan juga keterangananya bersesuaian dengan keterangan saksi lainya.
Fulfillment of the Right to Reduction of Prison Sentence for Drug Convicts Amas Madina; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Fathul Hamdani; Fitri Ayuningtyas; Siti Marwiyah
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1375

Abstract

This study examines the fulfillment of remission rights for drug offenders in Indonesia following the enactment of Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012, which introduced restrictive provisions inconsistent with the rehabilitative vision of Law No. 12 of 1995. The research problem lies in the normative contradiction between correctional laws oriented toward behavioural reform and derivative regulations that prioritise punitive measures. The study aims to evaluate the implementation of remission regulations and their alignment with principles of justice and human rights. Employing a normative legal research design, it analyses statutes, judicial decisions, doctrines, and comparative law. Findings reveal that remission has shifted from a universal right to a conditional privilege, disproportionately affecting low-level drug offenders, exacerbating prison overcrowding, and weakening legal certainty. The study concludes that policy reform is necessary through individualised assessments, restorative justice integration, independent oversight, and regulatory harmonisation to restore fairness and uphold human rights.