Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal on Education Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Ulul Azmi Fadhilah
Universitas Negeri Medan
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Inovasi Cemilan Sehat dan Praktis Berbahan Alami sebagai Alternatif Jajanan Anak Sekolah Bolivia Renata Sianipar; Grace Putri Johana Rajagukguk; Raihan Ananda Azma; Stela Triyuni Purba; Ulul Azmi Fadhilah; Fitriani Lubis
Journal on Education Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Journal on Education: Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Departement of Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joe.v7i1.7397

Abstract

The innovation of healthy snacks made from natural ingredients in the form of jelly with dragon fruit, strawberries, and mango aims to provide a healthy alternative for school children and the surrounding community. This snack combines the nutritional benefits of fresh fruits rich in vitamins and fiber while offering a delicious taste that appeals to children. With practical and easy-to-consume packaging, this jelly is ideal for sale in school environments and local markets, making it a healthier choice compared to processed snacks. This innovation aims to support healthy eating habits in schools and raise awareness among the community about the importance of good nutritional intake.
Analisis Komparatif Kerangka Kerja Manajemen Risiko ISO 31000 dan COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): Studi Literatur Magdalena Sihotang; Alika Putri; Ulul Azmi Fadhilah; Muhammad Rizal
Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Oktober, Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Publisher : Perkumpulan Konsultan Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia (PKMPI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and compare two widely adopted risk management frameworks, namely ISO 31000 and the COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework. The research employed a qualitative literature review approach by collecting and examining various scientific sources, including journals, books, and official documents related to risk management. The analysis focused on identifying the concepts, principles, components, strengths, limitations, and implementation implications of both frameworks across different types of organizations. The findings indicated that ISO 31000 offers advantages in terms of flexibility, adaptability, and ease of implementation due to its emphasis on general principles, frameworks, and risk management processes. In contrast, COSO ERM places greater emphasis on integrating risk management with organizational strategy, governance, and performance, thereby supporting strategic decision-making and long-term value creation. Although both frameworks share the same objective of helping organizations manage risks effectively, they differ in their approaches and areas of focus. ISO 31000 is more suitable for organizations requiring a simple and flexible risk management system, whereas COSO ERM is more appropriate for organizations seeking a high level of integration between risk management and strategic objectives. The study also found that combining ISO 31000 and COSO ERM can create a more comprehensive risk management system by leveraging the strengths of both frameworks. Therefore, organizations should select or integrate these frameworks according to their characteristics, risk complexity, and organizational objectives to ensure effective and sustainable risk management.
Co-Authors Alika Putri Bolivia Renata Sianipar Fitriani Lubis Grace Putri Johana Rajagukguk Magdalena Sihotang Muhammad Rizal Raihan Ananda Azma Stela Triyuni Purba