Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Pemeriksaan Saksi Secara Bersama-Sama Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Uun Ulfiana; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Desember: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i4.2527

Abstract

The examination of witnesses regulated by Act No. 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure Law (hereinafter referred to as KUHAP) is a provision concerning formal criminal law. In the case No. PDM-242/JKTSL/10/2022 with the accused Ferdy Sambo (FS) and the case N. P.D.M-246/Jktsl/10/2022 with Princess Chandrwati (PC) there is an event conducted examination of witnesses jointly, becoming a material of investigation, whether such examination can be carried out simultaneously considering the witness in giving explanations must be independent. To respond to the focus of research in this research use normative jurisprudential research methods with conceptual approaches and legislative approaches. The conclusion is that the joint examination of witnesses is based on Article 172 (1) of the Convention. Accordingly, the public prosecutor or the accused or the legal counselor may prepare a witness of a qualitative nature, subject to the provisions of applicable law, so that the testimony of the witnesses may have a valid proof force. Furthermore, it is expected that the law enforcement agencies will be able to carry out witness examination procedures accurately and honestly in order to the objective of the examination in the trial, which is to material truth.
Formulasi Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dengan Pelaku Anak Yang Berkepastian Hukum Sieldy Aprilia Utami; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun; Ainul Azizah
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.280

Abstract

Based on the development of theoretical discourse and reform of criminal law in various countries, there is a strong tendency for law enforcers to apply solutions outside the judicial process as a way to resolve problems in the field of criminal law. In general, settlements outside the judicial process are carried out in civil cases. Meanwhile, in the field of criminal law, settlement outside the judicial process is applied to the resolution of cases of children who are in conflict with the law which violates the rules of criminal law which refer to the Child Protection Justice System Law.The crime of sexual violence committed by children is one of the crimes where the case is resolved through a settlement outside the judicial process. In practice, law enforcement officials use different regulations based on each level in the examination process, both at the investigation, prosecution and court examination levels. The differences in written regulations that are used as a legal basis by the Police, Public Prosecutors, or Judges in implementing settlement policies outside the judicial process based on a restorative justice approach through diversion efforts which have implications for legal uncertainty require efforts to reformulate current legal regulations through criminal law policies.
Perlindungan Hukum Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Eksploitasi Seksual dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Firda Yunita Dewi; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun; Ainul Azizah
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.631

Abstract

The cases of child sexual exploitation continue to rise in Indonesia. However, the legal system has yet to provide legal certainty for children as victims. This study aims to examine the positive legal framework regarding the protection of child victims of sexual exploitation, assess its implementation in providing legal certainty, and offer an ideal concept of legal protection for the future. The method used is normative juridical with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that although legal instruments such as the Child Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law, and regulations related to restitution are in place, their implementation remains ineffective. Restitution rights are often not pursued due to victims’ lack of awareness and weaknesses in the legal system. This study recommends that restitution be granted automatically and that the role of law enforcement be strengthened to ensure the protection of children's rights.
URGENSI PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Moch. Hasan Hafani; Dominikus Rato; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi November 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1200

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan merupakan kerangka hukum utama dalam sistem legislasi nasional. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya, ditemukan berbagai kelemahan mendasar yang menghambat efektivitas pembentukan regulasi di Indonesia. Beberapa kelemahan tersebut antara lain ketidakjelasan posisi hierarki norma hukum, lemahnya harmonisasi antar peraturan, keterbatasan partisipasi publik, serta belum optimalnya pengaturan mengenai kewenangan pengundangan. Kelemahan-kelemahan ini menyebabkan inkonsistensi regulasi, konflik antar jenis peraturan, dan rendahnya legitimasi hukum di mata masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, perubahan terhadap UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 dianggap mendesak untuk meningkatkan efektivitas legislasi nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, serta jurnal-jurnal akademik yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa urgensi perubahan UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 tidak hanya menyangkut aspek teknis administratif, tetapi juga mencakup kebutuhan untuk membentuk sistem legislasi yang lebih terintegrasi, transparan, dan partisipatif. Dengan adanya perubahan tersebut, proses pembentukan regulasi diharapkan menjadi lebih efisien, mampu merespons dinamika sosial secara tepat, serta memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum yang lebih baik kepada masyarakat.
Co-Authors Ainul Azizah Dominikus Rato Firda Yunita Dewi Moch. Hasan Hafani Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Sieldy Aprilia Utami Uun Ulfiana