Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

Urgensi Legislasi Pelaksanaan mandat UUD 1945 Mengantisipasi ASEAN Economic Community 2015 Arundhati, Gautama Budi; Martua Samosir, Samuel Saut; Chandra, Ratih Listyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (231.255 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Societal welfare is the achievement that should be supported by Government which essentialy has the obligation for the societal welfare through the arrangements within the scope of authority under the mandate of the preamble and articles of   the Indonesian Constitution of 1945 and relevant laws. The mandate of ASEAN Charter, which was ratified by House of Representative by Law Number 38 of 2008 concerning Ratification of the Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, is not an opponent of the Constitution of 1945 in terms of societal welfare, as long  as the legislation is implemented on the right way, which can protect Indonesian. The legislative action must reflect the needs and the factual conditions of Indonesian. Regulation relating to the implementation of the ASEAN Charter should always be accompanied by exemption or exception to the path of liberation from the regional competition law which is a logical consequence of the free market of ASEAN in some fields.
Keterkaitan Percobaan atau Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Samosir, Samuel Saut Martua
FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE Vol 16, No 2 (2018): FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (486.195 KB) | DOI: 10.32528/faj.v26i2.2043

Abstract

Dalam ketentuan yang terdapat dalam pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika, ternyata terdapat suatu hal yang menarik untuk dikaji adalah terkait dengan pemahaman unsur percobaan atau permufakatan jahat dalam ketentuan pasal tersebut. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia mengenai pemahaman tentang percobaan dan permufakatan jahat dengan tegas dibedakan dalam pengertiannya. Ketentuan pada pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika menyatukan kedua hal tersebut dalam satu pasal meskipun ada frase kata ?atau? yang menjembatani antara unsur kata percobaan dan permufakatan jahat tersebut. dalam hasil analisis pasal tersebut, ditemukan bahwa unsur pasal kata permufakatan jahat sebagaimana diartikan adanya kesepakatan antara dua orang atau lebih, maka dalam hal ketentuan pasal ini, maka apabila dua orang yang tertangkap sebelum melakukan delik yang selesai sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika, maka hal ini bukanlah dikatakan sebagai percobaan saja tapi sudah merupakan tindak pidana yang selesai apabila ada dua orang atau lebih melakukan kesepakatan sebagaimana tindak pidana yang ditentukan dalam pasal 132 ayat (1) UU Narkotika tersebut, namun jika pelakunya hanyalah seorang maka, pelaku yang dikenakan akan pasal tersebut dianggap melakukan suatu percobaan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam ketentuan pasal 132 ayat (1)UU NarkotikaKata Kunci : percobaan, permufakatan jahat, narkotika
Urgensi Legislasi Pelaksanaan mandat UUD 1945 Mengantisipasi ASEAN Economic Community 2015 Gautama Budi Arundhati; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir; Ratih Listyana Chandra
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (231.255 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1127

Abstract

Societal welfare is the achievement that should be supported by Government which essentialy has the obligation for the societal welfare through the arrangements within the scope of authority under the mandate of the preamble and articles of   the Indonesian Constitution of 1945 and relevant laws. The mandate of ASEAN Charter, which was ratified by House of Representative by Law Number 38 of 2008 concerning Ratification of the Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, is not an opponent of the Constitution of 1945 in terms of societal welfare, as long  as the legislation is implemented on the right way, which can protect Indonesian. The legislative action must reflect the needs and the factual conditions of Indonesian. Regulation relating to the implementation of the ASEAN Charter should always be accompanied by exemption or exception to the path of liberation from the regional competition law which is a logical consequence of the free market of ASEAN in some fields.
Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana terhadap Anak Pelaku Pidana yang Diancam dengan Ketentuan Pidana yang Memiliki Ketentuan Ancaman Minimal Khusus Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2014): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (166.192 KB) | DOI: 10.36835/rechtens.v3i2.103

Abstract

One of the criminal provisions that have specific minimum criminal sanctions and can only be done by a child actor is the provision referred to in Article 81 of Law No. 23 of 2002 on the Protection of the Child which states that any person who knowingly commit violence or threats of violence to force children sexual intercourse with him or with another person, shall be punished with imprisonment of fifteen (15) years and a minimum of 3 (three) years ....., but the laws of the criminal justice system in addition to providing kakhususan for child actors, namely as under the provisions of 81, paragraph 2 of Law criminal Justice System Child which states that imprisonment can be imposed on the longest Son 1/2 (one half) of a maximum penalty of imprisonment for adults, it is based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, rules general no longer have the force of law when there are specific rules, which in this case is the set of criminal punishment for child offenders.
Sistem Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Pidana Pencabulan terhadap Anak: Studi Putusan Nomor: 535/Pid.sus/2015/PN.Bls Santi Dewi Antika; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i3.8244

Abstract

As the nation's future generation, children have the right to a protected environment, as a lack thereof endangers their growth. One form of child protection is specifically regulated in Law Number 35 of 2014 on the Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection (Child Protection Act). Decency crimes against children as in case Number 535 / Pid.sus / 2015 / PN.Bls, the judge drops Article 82 Paragraph (1) of the Child Protection Act. This article contains two problems, inter alia, the judge's decision in case Number 535 / Pid.sus / 2015 / PN.Bls whether it is in accordance with Article 82 paragraph (1) or Article 81 Paragraph (2) of the Child Protection Law and whether the witnesses are examined in case Number 535 /Pid.sus/2015/PN.Bls complies with Article 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study uses the method of legal research with conceptual approach. The results and conclusions obtained in the writing of this article states that the judge must be more thorough in proving the elements of the article, and examine the witness more carefully to see the provisions of Article 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Keywords: Judge's Decision, Molestation, Child
Penerapan Penggunaan Irah-Irah “Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” dalam Konteks Pencapaian Keadilan Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
Jurnal Supremasi Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar, Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.58 KB) | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v9i2.790

Abstract

It is required that every head of the verdict has specific nomenclature “On behalf of Justice in the name of one and only God” which entrenched in Article 197 paragraph 1of the Criminal Code Procedure. The head of the verdict stressed that there is a word of justice based on the one and only God which has the main purpose is for the court examination in order to pursue justice, but there is a problem when the contents of the ruling did not provide justice for the prosecuted party, it can be indicated that the case filed to the appeal court by parties whose refuse the decision. According to the legal issues there exist the new paradigm to the concept of the head of the verdict which states“On behalf of Justice in the name of one and only God” only for decisions that have permanent legal force, this is an effort to achieve procedural justice and moral Justice
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN LEGAL PERSPECTIVE Samuel Saut Martua Samosir; Gautama Budi Arundhati; Firman Floranta Adonara
UNEJ e-Proceeding 2022: E-Prosiding Kolokium Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This community service is entitled "Prevention and Handling of Domestic Violence from a Legal Perspective". In family life it is undeniable that conflict can occur in family relationships, conflict resolution should be resolved properly by realizing and understanding the feelings, personality and emotional control of each family member so that happiness in the family is realized. Healthy conflict resolution occurs when each family member does not prioritize personal interests, look for the root of the problem and make solutions that are mutually beneficial to family members through good and smooth communication. But on the other hand, conflicts that exist in the family, can happen badly so that it can lead to domestic violence (KDRT). This outreach activity was carried out using the problem inventory method, lectures, discussions and direct questions and answers with the participants. This activity was successful and has the potential to be followed up into a more concrete and contributive agenda. This community service was carried out on January 27, 2022 at the Head of the Muslimat Nahdahtul Ulama Branch of Karangpring Village, Sukorambi District, Jember Regency. The form of the activity is counseling, by providing socialization on Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, with the aim of forming the public to know and understand the law while at the same time fostering community sensitivity and solidarity. Keywords: domestic violence, prevention, solidarity
Urgensi Legislasi Pelaksanaan mandat UUD 1945 Mengantisipasi ASEAN Economic Community 2015 Gautama Budi Arundhati; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir; Ratih Listyana Chandra
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (231.255 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1127

Abstract

Societal welfare is the achievement that should be supported by Government which essentialy has the obligation for the societal welfare through the arrangements within the scope of authority under the mandate of the preamble and articles of   the Indonesian Constitution of 1945 and relevant laws. The mandate of ASEAN Charter, which was ratified by House of Representative by Law Number 38 of 2008 concerning Ratification of the Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, is not an opponent of the Constitution of 1945 in terms of societal welfare, as long  as the legislation is implemented on the right way, which can protect Indonesian. The legislative action must reflect the needs and the factual conditions of Indonesian. Regulation relating to the implementation of the ASEAN Charter should always be accompanied by exemption or exception to the path of liberation from the regional competition law which is a logical consequence of the free market of ASEAN in some fields.
Keterkaitan Percobaan atau Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Samuel Saut Martua Samosir
FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE Vol 16, No 2 (2018): FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/faj.v26i2.2043

Abstract

Dalam ketentuan yang terdapat dalam pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika, ternyata terdapat suatu hal yang menarik untuk dikaji adalah terkait dengan pemahaman unsur percobaan atau permufakatan jahat dalam ketentuan pasal tersebut. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia mengenai pemahaman tentang percobaan dan permufakatan jahat dengan tegas dibedakan dalam pengertiannya. Ketentuan pada pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika menyatukan kedua hal tersebut dalam satu pasal meskipun ada frase kata “atau” yang menjembatani antara unsur kata percobaan dan permufakatan jahat tersebut. dalam hasil analisis pasal tersebut, ditemukan bahwa unsur pasal kata permufakatan jahat sebagaimana diartikan adanya kesepakatan antara dua orang atau lebih, maka dalam hal ketentuan pasal ini, maka apabila dua orang yang tertangkap sebelum melakukan delik yang selesai sebagaimana dimaksud dalam pasal 132 ayat 1 UU Narkotika, maka hal ini bukanlah dikatakan sebagai percobaan saja tapi sudah merupakan tindak pidana yang selesai apabila ada dua orang atau lebih melakukan kesepakatan sebagaimana tindak pidana yang ditentukan dalam pasal 132 ayat (1) UU Narkotika tersebut, namun jika pelakunya hanyalah seorang maka, pelaku yang dikenakan akan pasal tersebut dianggap melakukan suatu percobaan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam ketentuan pasal 132 ayat (1)UU NarkotikaKata Kunci : percobaan, permufakatan jahat, narkotika
MENILIK PEMENJARAAN TERPIDANA SKIZOFRENIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Dodik Prihatin A.N.; Samuel Saut Martua Samosir; Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2022.v7.i1.p63-82

Abstract

Skizofrenia termasuk gangguan jiwa golongan psikotik. Dalam beberapa kasus pidana, hakim menjatuhkan sanksi pidana penjara terhadap pelaku skizofrenia. Ketepatan pemenjaraan terhadap seorang skizofrenia merupakan fokus dari tulisan ini. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus putusan pengadilan digunakan dalam menganalisis pokok permasalahan. Penentuan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap ODGJ di dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia menganut gemischte methode dengan sistem deskriptif normatif. Keterangan ahli jiwa, tidak mengikat hakim di dalam memutus perkara, dan hakim menjatuhkan sanksi pidana penjara berdasarkan keyakinannya, meskipun terdakwa seorang skizofrenia. Pemenjaraan terhadap seorang skizofrenia paranoid kronik berorientasi pada teori tujuan retributif, sedangkan pemenjaraan terhadap seorang skizofrenia fase remisi berorientasi pada teori teleologis. Mengingat sifat berbahayanya seorang skizofrenia, seharusnya sebelum dan selama menjalani sanksi pidana penjara memerlukan pemeriksaan kesehatan jiwa. Pemenjaraan terhadap seorang skizofrenia setidaknya dapat memberikan perlindungan terhadap sesama narapidana dan petugas lembaga pemasyarakatan selama terpidana menjalani sanksi.