Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jurnal Jurisprudence
Ulya Shafa Firdausi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Harta Benda dalam Perkawinan Ulya Shafa Firdausi; Dian Rosita; Arina Novitasari; Maslikan, Maslikan
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i4.1372

Abstract

Marriage is a physical and spiritual bond between a man and a woman, aimed at forming a happy and lasting family. In marriage, property plays a crucial role and is legally classified as either joint property or personal property, as regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). However, property ownership often becomes a source of conflict, sometimes leading to divorce.The legal status of property after divorce depends on the applicable legal framework, whether Islamic law, customary law, or the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). To prevent disputes, couples may establish a prenuptial agreement to regulate property ownership and division. This study employs a normative juridical method by analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research aims to provide an understanding of the legal status of property in marriage and the importance of prenuptial agreements in avoiding conflicts and ensuring a harmonious household.
Juridical Reasoning for the Distribution of Pharmaceutical Preparations that Failed the Efficacy Test in Court Decisions Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan; Richard Tomlins; Ulya Shafa Firdausi; Yusuf Adam Hilman
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4094

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of thestudy (Tujuan) : The purpose of this research is to determine the judge's considerations in imposing sanctions on pharmaceutical distributors who do not meet the efficacy and quality standards by the Ponorogo district court decision Number 115/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Png using juridical analysis.  Methodology (Metodologi): The methodology used is a normative research method or library research method. Results (Temuan): The results of this research are that there are cases of distribution of drugs that do not match the efficacy and quality, violating the protection rights of consumers. The government and BPOM are expected to pay more attention to the pharmaceutical production process and provide education to the lay public in the pharmaceutical sector so that the public obtain safe and quality pharmaceutical products. Ponorogo District Court Decision Number 115/Pid, Sus/2023/PN Png The panel of judges considered evidence, legal interpretation, and ethics during the trial. This case violates Law Number 36 of 2009 Article 196 concerning Health. By considering this, circumstances emerged that mitigated and aggravated the defendant and also used the theory of will and the theory of knowledge so that he was charged with imprisonment for 1 (one) year and a fine of IDR 5,000,000.00 (five million rupiah) provided that the fine was not paid to be replaced by imprisonment for one month. The decision at the Ponorogo District Court provides a solid foundation for future courts in handling similar cases. Applications of this study (Kegunaan): The use of this research can be an in-depth understanding of the decision ratio in the Ponorogo District Court Decision for both perpetrators, legal practitioners, academics, and policymakers for future directions. Novelty/ Orginalty of this study (Kebaruan/Orisinalitas): The difference with previous studies is that the focus of this research is the location of the research, the type of drug used and the district court decision          
Co-Authors Arina Novitasari Dian Rosita Ferry Irawan Maslikan, Maslikan Richard Tomlins Yusuf Adam Hilman