Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST DRIVERS WHO DO NOT REPORT CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP Dony, Mulian; Asnawi, Eddy; Oktapani, Silm
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i2.351

Abstract

The assignment of Vehicle Registration Numbers (Tanda Nomor Kendaraan Bermotor - TNKB) serves a purpose and represents one of the initial steps in implementing the legal norms that society aims to achieve. Therefore, as citizens, it is our duty to comply with prevailing laws and regulations. Consequently, every motor vehicle must display a TNKB that adheres to the applicable provisions to ensure compliance with legal norms and regulations. The Indonesian National Police (Kepolisian Republik Indonesia) is the authority responsible for law enforcement, particularly concerning traffic. Traffic and road transportation must be developed to enhance their potential and role in ensuring security, welfare, and order in traffic and transportation, supporting economic development, advancements in science and technology, regional autonomy, and accountability in state administration. This study employs a sociological legal research method. Based on the research findings, law enforcement against drivers who fail to report changes in vehicle ownership in Pekanbaru City, as stipulated in the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 7 of 2021 on Vehicle Registration and Identification, has not been effectively implemented. This is due to the presence of drivers who neglect to report changes in vehicle ownership. Strict law enforcement against non-compliance aims to prevent potential misuse of vehicles, such as theft or fraud, and to ensure the legitimate identification of vehicle owners. Furthermore, law enforcement ensures that vehicles operating on public roads remain properly registered in the vehicle administration system, which is crucial for ownership and tax obligation. The factors hindering law enforcement against drivers who fail to report changes in vehicle ownership in Pekanbaru City, as outlined in the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 7 of 2021 on Vehicle Registration and Identification, include a lack of public awareness about the importance of reporting changes in vehicle ownership, inadequate coordination between law enforcement and relevant agencies in monitoring the ownership change process, as the reporting procedure often involves various administrative stages requiring validation from multiple parties, such as the Regional Revenue Office for vehicle tax payments. Additionally, insufficient oversight of motor vehicle sales transactions, especially those conducted without official documentation, has resulted in many vehicles changing hands without undergoing proper reporting processes. Efforts to address the obstacles to law enforcement against drivers who fail to report changes in vehicle ownership in Pekanbaru City, as per the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 7 of 2021 on Vehicle Registration and Identification, include enhancing public awareness of the importance of compliance with this regulation, imposing sanctions on drivers who fail to report ownership changes to create a deterrent effect and encourage compliance, and providing more intensive education to the public about the legal risks of failing to report vehicle ownership changes. Additionally, the police should develop a more practical and efficient reporting system, such as a digital application that allows the public to report vehicle ownership changes without having to visit police stations.
The Crime of Genocide and its Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 Concerning Human Rights Daeng M, Mohd. Yusuf; Saputra, Dodi Ripo; Dony, Mulian; Siregar, Hanipah; Imelda, Rezki
Journal of Law and Humanity Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Humanity Studies
Publisher : Penerbit Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/tgcmjf63

Abstract

Genocide crimes are often associated with crimes against humanity, but when examined more closely, genocide crimes differ from crimes against humanity. Genocide crimes target groups such as nations, races, ethnicities, or religions, whereas crimes against humanity are directed at citizens and civilians. Additionally, genocide crimes can annihilate part or all of a group, whereas crimes against humanity do not have such specifications or conditions. The demands for resolving human rights violation cases led to the creation of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, followed by Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts, which aims to address various human rights violation issues, particularly serious human rights violations. Article 7 of the Human Rights Court Law states that genocide crimes are severe human rights violations due to actions such as killing, causing severe suffering, extermination, coercion by groups, and forcibly transferring children from one group to another. Thus, this human rights court law explicitly threatens the perpetrators. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the research results, it is known that Genocide Crimes and Their Implications in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights show that genocide is one of the most serious forms of human rights violations, involving systematic efforts to destroy certain groups based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights does not specifically and in detail regulate genocide crimes and their elements. This results in a lack of a strong and comprehensive legal framework to prosecute genocide perpetrators and provide justice and legal certainty for victims. Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts in Indonesia is considered inadequate to handle serious human rights violations. Several weaknesses identified include procedural law still referring to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which complicates the proof process, and ambiguities in applying regulations due to the incomplete "elements of crimes" stipulated. This results in a lack of effectiveness in prosecuting serious crimes like genocide, which are often triggered by ethnic, religious, and racial factors. The prohibition of genocide crimes is regulated through international and national laws. However, resolving serious human rights violations within the Indonesian criminal justice system based on Law Number 26 of 2000 has not succeeded in creating legal certainty and justice for the victims of violations in East Timor