Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Strafvodering Indonesian Ipso Jure
Borman, M.Syahrul
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FRAUD MONEY Rp 285.000.000 OF OVERSEAS TRAVEL DOCUMENT PROCESSING (VISA) (Case Study of Police Report Number: LP / 432 / IX / 2020 / SULUT / SPKT) Barail, Deiser; Borman, M.Syahrul; Handayati, Nur; Subekti, Subekti
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i1.557

Abstract

The difficulty of finding work in the country encourages many Indonesian workers to work abroad. To be able to leave Indonesia and be accepted in the destination country, one must have a visa as an entry permit and travel permit. However, there are still many people who do not understand the administrative procedures for visa processing, so service bureaus have emerged that offer document processing services. These service bureaus require operational and service fees. However, there are many cases where service bureaus receive money but do not fulfill their obligations, resulting in disputes that lead to police reports. This research examines criminal liability in visa processing fraud cases, with a focus on Police Report Case Study Number: LP/432/IX/2020/SULUT/SPKT. In addition, this study also analyzes the legal consequences of criminal fraud in visa management. The research method used is normative legal research, which examines legal norms based on a statutory approach. The analysis is carried out normatively qualitative with inductive logic, using the method of interpretation and comparative legal construction. In criminal law, fault is an important element in determining criminal liability. The principle of “no punishment without fault” emphasizes that a person can only be convicted if proven guilty. The legal consequences of the crime of visa fraud are criminal sanctions in accordance with Article 378 of the Criminal Code, which stipulates a maximum imprisonment of four years for perpetrators of fraud.
Criminal Acts Of Fraud In Buying And Selling Crypto Christofan, Agustinus; Borman, M.Syahrul
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): JOSI - MARCH
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ntwbjw02

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify legal loopholes that can be exploited by criminals to commit fraud through cryptocurrency media. This study employs a normative research approach, incorporating a legal perspective. A normative study is a legal research approach that examines doctrinal studies of law. The findings of this research include several case studies and literature that support the argument that cryptocurrency provides opportunities for illegal transactions or other negative activities. Strong speculation suggests that digital currencies are highly vulnerable to being used as a medium for fraud and other abuses, such as financing terrorism, arms and drug trafficking, and various other crimes. This vulnerability arises due to the blockchain-based encryption system of cryptocurrencies, which offers a high level of security, complexity, and anonymity. Furthermore, there are ongoing efforts to establish cryptocurrency as a recognized currency in Indonesia, as evidenced by its increasing use and the emergence of regulations regarding its legality. Therefore, this research highlights the importance of legal oversight in preventing the misuse of cryptocurrency in criminal activities
Kekuatan Hukum Petok D Sebagai Tanda Bukti Kepemilikan Tanah dalam Penyelesaian Tanah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Studi Kasus Tanah Bengkok Kebayan III Desa Gedongmulyo Kecamatan Lasem Jawa Tengah) Wildan Irhansyah , Muhammad Ardi; Borman, M.Syahrul; Prawesthi, Wahyu
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.2133

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum Petok D dalam sistem hukum agraria Indonesia dan menjelaskan perannya dalam praktik penguasaan serta penyelesaian sengketa tanah bengkok di tingkat desa. Pertanyaan utama yang ingin dijawab adalah sejauh mana Petok D memiliki kekuatan pembuktian hukum dan bagaimana implikasinya bagi masyarakat pemegang tanah. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis dan bersifat kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan masyarakat pemegang Petok D, aparatur desa, dan pejabat pertanahan, disertai observasi lapangan dan studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, serta yurisprudensi. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif kualitatif dengan mengaitkan temuan empiris dan norma hukum yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Petok D tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum sebagai bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah, melainkan hanya bernilai sebagai bukti administratif penguasaan. Ketergantungan masyarakat terhadap Petok D menciptakan kepastian hukum semu dan meningkatkan kerentanan sengketa. Temuan ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman empiris mengenai pluralisme hukum pertanahan dan menegaskan perlunya percepatan legalisasi tanah. Kesimpulan penelitian menekankan pentingnya pendekatan sosio-legal dalam kebijakan pertanahan serta merekomendasikan penelitian lanjutan terkait model legalisasi tanah berbasis komunitas.
IMPLEMENTASI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI DISKRESI DALAM KASUS PENGANIAYAAN RINGAN DI POLRES MOJOKERTO Wijaya, Muhammad Aditya Kusuma; Handayati, Nur; Borman, M.Syahrul
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i3.832

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of restorative justice as a form of discretion in the settlement of minor abuse cases at the Mojokerto Police Station, as well as to identify the obstacles encountered in the process. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach with data collection techniques through literature studies and interviews with investigators at the Mojokerto Police Station. The results show that the Mojokerto Police have applied a restorative justice approach to minor assault cases by referring to Perpol No. 8 of 2021 and the provisions of Article 18 of Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Police. This discretion is exercised through penal mediation between the perpetrator and the victim, resulting in a peaceful agreement that leads to the termination of the investigation. However, this process is not without various obstacles, including a lack of public understanding, limited investigator resources, and cultural and administrative barriers. The conclusion of this study confirms that although discretion in the form of restorative justice has become an effective and humane legal solution, institutional strengthening, training of officials, and public education are still needed for its optimal implementation
KEWENANGAN OPERATOR TERMINAL DALAM PENGAWASAN DAN PENINDAKAN TERHADAP ANGKUTAN LIAR Widodo, Ugen Cahyo; Borman, M.Syahrul; Hidayati, Nur
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i3.848

Abstract

This research is motivated by the prevalence of illegal transportation operating without official permits within and around public terminals, disrupting order and safety in land transportation. The research problems include: (1) the authority of terminal operators in supervising illegal transportation, and (2) the legal sanctions applicable to illegal transportation within and outside the terminal. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the authority of terminal operators is administrative in nature, limited to checking administrative completeness and operational arrangements, without repressive authority to impose criminal sanctions directly. The main obstacles identified include regulatory gaps, overlapping authorities among institutions, limited facilities and human resources, and weak inter-agency coordination. This research recommends strengthening the legal basis of terminal operators’ authority, enhancing inter-agency coordination, and reformulating integrated supervision policies to achieve orderly, safe, and law-based public transportation
Miscarriage of Justice in Corporate Fraud Cases: The Legal Paradox of the Herlambang Gold Transaction in Indonesia Lyanawati, Yuli Maria; Borman, M.Syahrul; Cornelis, Vieta Imelda
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/jn3e2z56

Abstract

This article examines a high value gold transaction dispute that illustrates how fragmented judicial reasoning, prosecutorial discretion, and corporate governance failures can converge to produce a miscarriage of justice in complex economic-crime cases. Using a socio-legal case study approach, the analysis reconstructs a transaction in which a buyer paid IDR 1.2 trillion for 4,000 kilograms of gold but received only 2,400 kilograms, a shortfall acknowledged by the selling corporation in civil proceedings. Early criminal cases convicted corporate insiders for fraud, recognizing the buyer as a victim. However, subsequent corruption proceedings reversed this position, alleging without evidentiary support that the buyer unlawfully obtained excess gold and caused state financial loss. Criminal courts accepted this narrative despite auditor testimony confirming the absence of state loss and despite inconsistencies with civil judgments. The findings reveal four systemic weaknesses: disregard of documentary evidence, role inversion from victim to offender, contradictory civil–criminal outcomes, and liability shifting driven by corporate governance failures. These dynamics align with broader patterns of wrongful convictions in economic-crime contexts. The study underscores the need for stronger evidentiary standards, improved inter-court coordination, enhanced forensic capacity, and clearer boundaries between commercial disputes and corruption enforcement
Co-Authors Barail, Deiser Christofan, Agustinus Cornelis, Vieta Imelda Handayati, Nur Lyanawati, Yuli Maria Nur Hidayati Subekti . Wahyu Prawesthi, Wahyu Widodo, Ugen Cahyo Wijaya, Muhammad Aditya Kusuma Wildan Irhansyah , Muhammad Ardi