Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Framing Analysis of Nusantara Capital City on Indonesia Environmental Activist Posts at Instagram Azalia, Syafina
JOURNAL OF SOCIETY INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Journal of Society Innovation and Development
Publisher : Winaya Inspirasi Nusantara Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63924/jsid.v6i2.199

Abstract

Background of the problem: Recently, environmental activists of Indonesia are becoming increasingly aggressive in raising public awareness about environmental issues on social media platforms to highlight environmental problems caused by various factors, including political endeavours. Purpose: The focus of this study is to explore the language choices used in the environmental account’s posts and express their attitudes toward Nusantara Capital City. Method: The data of this study is obtained from one of prominent Indonesia environmental activist account on Instagram, namely greenpeaceid. For highlighting research novelty, this study collects the posts of Nusantara Capital City of Indonesia published from January to September 2024. Moreover, this study uses descriptive qualitative approach to get depth understanding of provided contents. Result: This study result found three ideas conveyed by greenpeaceid post regarding Nusantara Capital City, including rushed development, disregard of environmental sustainability and indigenous rights, and neglect of renewable energy solutions. Moreover, they directly blame the Indonesia government who is not able to thoroughly consider the indigenous people living there for years. Implication: This research significantly contributes primarily to academics or scholars who are interested in framing analysis studies. It is because this study concerns on analysing Environmental issue that is related with political issue in social media.
Lexical Bundle Structure and Function of ChatGPT-Generated Essay: Corpus-Based Study of Advanced Learners in Indonesia Azalia, Syafina; Widodo, Pratomo; Wiedarti, Pangesti; Sudartinah, Titik
JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/joall.v10i2.39244

Abstract

Numerous studies have primarily focused on investigating the linguistic structures of academic writing, such as theses, dissertations, and articles from reputable journals authored by individuals ranging from novices to experts. However, few studies have examined the linguistic structures of texts written by AI, particularly those produced by ChatGPT. This study aims to analyze the lexical bundle structure and function variations of 10 argumentative essays generated by ChatGPT, which were composed based on prompts provided by advanced learners in Indonesia, specifically graduate students of applied linguistics from Yogyakarta University. The objective is to explore the lexical bundle structure and function of ChatGPT-generated essays to understand how the AI employs various linguistic forms and constructs relationships between sentences. For data collection, this study utilized the corpus tool AntConc's N-gram feature to refine the four-word lexical bundles from the collected essays. The analysis used the frameworks of Hyland (2008b) and Biber et al. (1999). The result showed the Noun Phrase + pattern as the most frequent lexical bundle structure found in ChatGPT-generated essays. This structure has been used primarily to assert ideas and positions on the discussed topics (Stance Features), marking that ChatGPT has a strong ability in presenting and elaborating ideas. However, the least frequently found lexical bundle function is text construction that can link one idea to others to create the connection. Therefore, this study suggested that ChatGPT-generated essays can assist in effectively conveying the writer's perspectives but need attention or development in creating cohesive links between ideas in written discourse.
TEACHER BELIEFS OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR INSTRUCTION IN MERDEKA CURRICULUM Azalia, Syafina; Triastuti, Anita; Margana, Margana
Journal of English Educational Study (JEES) Vol 8, No 1 (2025): May Edition
Publisher : STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31932/jees.v8i1.4194

Abstract

As one of the essential elements in mastering the English language, grammar teaching remains a subject of debate. While the Merdeka curriculum encourages students to be more active in class and become independent learners, some teachers prefer to teach grammar in an isolated and explicit manner, while others believe in teaching grammar implicitly and within context. Given this issue, understanding teachers' beliefs about grammar is crucial to uncovering how they teach it in the classroom. This study aims to explore the teaching practices of two teachers at a reputable high school in Yogyakarta. Employing a descriptive qualitative method, the study used observation and open-ended interviews to gather data. In analyzing the data, the study applied the framework of Graus & Coppen (2016) to specify the grammar instruction strategies used by the teachers. The findings revealed that both teachers align with the goals of the Merdeka curriculum, which aims to foster independent learning by implementing various grammar instruction methods, such as Meaning-Focused Instruction that emphasizes linguistic function rather than form, Focus on Form (FonF) technique that concentrate on correcting grammar errors through student reflection rather than direct error correction, Implicit instruction which integrates grammar learning in real-life contexts, and Inductive Teaching Strategies that encourage critical thinking by having students deduce grammar rules from examples in the text rather than being explicitly taught the rules. Therefore, this study demonstrates that both teachers' methods align with the goals of the Merdeka curriculum.