Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian Candra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Fake Diplomas, Real Consequences: Legal and Ethical Challenges in the Legal Profession Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa; Neonbeni, Randy Vallentino; Rizal, Muhamad; Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian Candra; Husain, Husain
Constitutionale Vol 5 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v5i2.3608

Abstract

Integrity and trust are fundamental in the legal profession, yet diploma forgery threatens these values, leading to ethical violations and diminished public trust. This study examines the legal implications of diploma forgery in Case No. 20/Pid.B/2024/PN Tmg, where an individual used a fraudulent diploma to practice law. Using a normative legal approach, the study analyzes court decisions, legal doctrines, and statutory regulations, including Article 263 of the Indonesian Penal Code and Article 69 of Law No. 20 of 2003. Findings reveal weaknesses in verification systems, allowing unqualified individuals to enter the legal profession. To prevent such fraud, the study proposes blockchain-based diploma verification, offering tamper-proof credentialing and real-time authentication. Stricter regulations, enhanced verification, and ethical awareness campaigns are crucial to safeguarding legal integrity. Adopting blockchain verification can restore public trust, ensure professional accountability, and uphold the credibility of legal institutions.
Dualisme Pengaturan Sanksi terhadap Wajib Pajak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ketentuan dan Tata Cara Umum Perpajakan Kusuma, Ariska Cesar Divian Candra; Widodo, Kartika Youri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1265

Abstract

Indonesia’s taxation system faces regulatory dualism in imposing sanctions, involving both administrative and criminal measures under the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP), which may expose taxpayers to double jeopardy. Adopting a normative legal approach, this study examines the normative gaps in defining state revenue losses and highlights the legal uncertainty in delineating administrative violations from criminal offenses. The current framework risks overcriminalization and undermines the principle of ultimum remedium. This paper advocates for regulatory reform by clarifying the parameters of state losses and applying the una via principle to ensure legal certainty and proportional sanction enforcement.