Kholid Al Walid
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

MEHDI HAIRI YAZDI’S ‘ILM ḤUḌŪRĪ: A RESPONSE TO CONTEMPORARY EPISTEMOLOGICAL DEBATES Farkhan Fuady; Zainun Kamaluddin Fakih; Kholid Al Walid; Yusuf Rahman
Al-A'raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/ajpif.v22i1.11107

Abstract

This article aims to analyze Mehdi Hairi Yazdi’s contribution in responding to contemporary epistemological contestation through the idea of ‘ilm ḥuḍūrī. The main problem in modern epistemology lies in the relationship between the subject and object of knowledge, which tends to be dualistic in the Western epistemological tradition. Hairi Yazdi offers ‘ilm ḥuḍūrī as an alternative solution in modern epistemology. This research is a literature study using a qualitative method, and its data sources are from Mehdi Hairi Yazdi’s works and relevant research. The research findings show that Hairi Yazdi’s idea of ‘ilm ḥuḍūrī cannot only bridge the gap between rationalism and empiricism but provide a strong epistemological basis for the validity of mystical experiences. Furthermore, this idea offers a new perspective in studying Islamic philosophy. It contributes to the development of inclusive knowledge in facing the challenges of contemporary epistemology. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of ‘ilm ḥuḍūrī as an alternative paradigm that enriches contemporary epistemological discourse. 
The Implication of Chalmers' Onto- Epistemological Property Dualism on the Hard Problem of Consciousness: Neosadrian Perspective Fadhlu Rahman; Alim Roswantoro; Kholid Al Walid; Hadi Kharisman
Jurnal ISSUE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): ISSUE vol 2, No 2
Publisher : Jurnal ISSUE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the various onto-epistemological implications arising from Chalmers' property dualism within the framework of Neosadrian onto-epistemological substantialist dualism concerning consciousness. The methodology employed entails onto-epistemological philosophical analysis, encompassing ontology and epistemology as the two branches of philosophy addressing the nature of reality and knowledge concerning it. This onto-epistemological approach draws insights from various Neosadrian Islamic philosophical thinkers, including Taqi Misbah Yazdi, Muthahhari, Jawadi Amuli, and Thabataba'i. Consequently, the research inquiries encompass: firstly, elucidating how David J. Chalmers' argument on property dualism addresses the conundrum of consciousness; and secondly, exploring how Neosadrian onto-epistemology scrutinizes the concepts and ramifications of Chalmers' property dualism concerning consciousness. The investigation demonstrates that Chalmers' argumentation in response to The Hard Problem of Consciousness refers to the principle of pan-physicalism, positing consciousness as the foundation of reality's structure present in all entities. Moreover, consciousness, though distinct from matter, emerges from intricate material processes. Additionally, the unidirectional duality interaction (epiphenomenal) resulting from pan-physicalism, according to Chalmers, offers the most cogent explanation for bridging the onto-epistemological gap inherent in the hard problem of consciousness. From the Neosadrian perspective, Chalmers' viewpoint carries implications: firstly, Chalmers' pan-physicalism implies the absence of an ontological relationship between consciousness and matter, thereby perpetuating their entrapment in the ontological gap, which constitutes the central issue of the hard problem of consciousness. Secondly, as consciousness engenders something external to itself, it contradicts the principle of al-Wahid la Yashduru anhu illa al-wahid in the Neosadrian perspective and elevates the position of structured reality (muraqqab) over simple reality (basith).