Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

UPAYA HUKUM PASCAPUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN DALAM RANGKA MENEGAKKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Faisal Abdaud
Al-'Adl Vol 11, No 2 (2018): Al-'Adl
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kendari

In the current legal development there are several cases of pretrial decisions which are then not followed up by law enforcement while other pretrial judgments are in fact reciprocated with extraordinary resistance.The method used in this study is empirical normative research, which normatively / juridically examines the rules of legislation related to post-pretrial legal action.The result of the research is The validity of the suspect's appointment may be requested by the investigator or suspect or his family or his proxy for a maximum of 7 days must be decided as a provision which is ideal in bringing the birth of KUHAP into a new face.

Penilaian Praktek Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing pada Pukat Cincin di Kota Kendari Muhammad Rais; Faisal Abdaud; Parman Parman
Jurnal Inovasi Sains dan Teknologi (INSTEK) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Edisi Februari Tahun 2019 Jurnal Inovasi Sains dan Teknologi (INSTEK)
Publisher : LP3M Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/instek.v2i1.93

Praktek Illegal, Unreported dan Unregulated fishing (IUU Fishing) merupakan salah satu permasalahan sektor perikanan yang berdampak ekonomi, sosial dan ekologi. Pemerintah telah mengeluarkan berbagai kebijakan untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut. Hingga saat ini data dan informasi yang terkait dengan permasalahan IUU fishing pada berbagai wilayah pengelolaan perikanan di Indonesia masih sangat kurang, kebanyakan kajian yang ada masih bersifat umum. Pukat cincin Salah satu alat tangkap yang banyak dijumpai di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera (PPS) Kendari. Tercatat ada sekitar 21.235 ton sumberdaya perikanan yang didaratkan oleh berbagai jenis armada penangkapan (PPS Kendari, 2016). Kondisi ini berpotensi menciptakan praktek – praktek IUU fishing, sehingga diperlukan adanya kajian terkait hal tersebut. Tujuan dari penelitan ini adalah mengetahui tingkat kepatuhan armada kapal pukat cincin di PPS Kendari terhadap praktek IUU Fishing serta mengidentifikasi jenis pelanggarannya serta merumuskan rekomendasi strategi penanggulannya. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada Mei sampai dengan September 2018 di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Kendari. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode survey. Data yang dikumpulkan terdiri dari data primer dan sekunder. Instrumen utama penelitian adalah kuisioner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Tingkat kepatuhan armada pukat cincin di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Kendari terhadap praktek IUU Fishing sangat bervariasi tergantung aspeknya. Tingkat kepatuhan pada aspek Illegal lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan aspek unreported dan unregulated. Jenis - jenis pelanggaran IUU Fishing adalah Pencatatatn loogbook hasil tangkapan tidak sesuai dengan kenyataannya, tidak melaporkan lokasi penangkapan dengan baik dan tidak meregistrasi rumpon yang digunakan. Rekomendasi Strategi penyelesaian yang paling efektif adalah penegakan hukum dan pemberian sanksi administrasi.

Corruption During Non-Natural Disaster: Is Death Penalty Necessary? Faisal Abdaud; Ming-Hsi Sung; Wahyudi Umar
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 29, No 1: June 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v29i1.14247

Extraordinary measures are needed to combat corruption in Indonesia which has been characterised as an extraordinary crime. This includes the application of death penalty as governed in Section 2 point (2) of the Corruption Eradication Act 1999. This paper intends to analyse the implementation of the aforementioned article on corruption case that occurs during the COVID-19 outbreak. This normative legal research relies on secondary date which are collected from various sources including books, journals, related legislation. The result of the research shows that, in regard to corruption case, the death penalty is only applicable when the corruption is committed in certain circumstances as intended in Section 2 point (2) of the Corruption Eradication Act 1999 and its amendment. These include the event of state emergency and national natural disaster. By virtue of the principle of legality, death penalty cannot be applied to the corruption cases that occurs during the national non-natural disaster like the Covid-19 pandemic. Reinterpretation of the phrase "certain circumstances" is needed for the sake of promoting justice. They should include national non-natural disasters like the Covid-19 pandemic.

Menguak Realitas Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Faisal Abdaud
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari 2023, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v5i1.896

Traffic accidents resulting in fatalities are categorized as serious traffic accidents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reality of criminal liability in cases of traffic accidents resulting in fatalities where the victim's family and the perpetrator's family agree to settle. This study uses a normative legal research type. This qualitative study uses a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study show that the traffic accident case involving the perpetrator and victim "NA" is classified as a serious traffic accident resulting in fatalities as stipulated in Article 229 paragraph (4) of the UULLAJ. According to the provisions in the UULLAJ, there is no clause that allows serious traffic accident cases to be settled amicably. The provision of material compensation to the heirs of "NA" in the form of medical and/or funeral expenses is an obligation as stipulated in Article 235 paragraph (1) of the UULLAJ without waiving the criminal charges, so the provision of compensation is a form of responsibility that can be taken into consideration as a mitigating factor by the judge in court.

Menguak Realitas Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Faisal Abdaud
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Traffic accidents resulting in fatalities are categorized as serious traffic accidents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reality of criminal liability in cases of traffic accidents resulting in fatalities where the victim's family and the perpetrator's family agree to settle. This study uses a normative legal research type. This qualitative study uses a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study show that the traffic accident case involving the perpetrator and victim "NA" is classified as a serious traffic accident resulting in fatalities as stipulated in Article 229 paragraph (4) of the UULLAJ. According to the provisions in the UULLAJ, there is no clause that allows serious traffic accident cases to be settled amicably. The provision of material compensation to the heirs of "NA" in the form of medical and/or funeral expenses is an obligation as stipulated in Article 235 paragraph (1) of the UULLAJ without waiving the criminal charges, so the provision of compensation is a form of responsibility that can be taken into consideration as a mitigating factor by the judge in court.

The Role of Forensic Science in Proving Murder Cases at the Investigation Stage Arif, Muhammad; Abdaud, Faisal; Huzaiman, Huzaiman
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2989

Forensics is a science that has a crucial role in the judicial process through examination and collection of physical evidence found at crime scenes. The involvement of forensic experts at crime scenes usually occurs in significant cases, where they are only called upon request from the authorities. This study aims to study the role of forensic medicine in helping investigators find material truth in murder cases, as well as identify possible obstacles. Through a library legal research and descriptive approach, secondary data such as legal documents and literature are analyzed to provide a clear and detailed picture of role of forensic science in assisting investigators in finding the material truth in murder cases and asserting the obstacle of it. The results showed that forensic medicine has a crucial role in uncovering material truths and providing legitimate evidence in murder cases. However, lack of coordination between law enforcement officials and forensic doctors can be an obstacle. Therefore, good cooperation and coordination between law enforcement officials and forensic doctors is the key to success in handling this case. The principle of justice must be upheld in the investigation process.

Legal Considerations Judex Factie Acquittal and Guilty Judgments by Judex Juris Abdaud, Faisal; Umar, Wahyudi; Rustan, Ahmad; Ming-Hsi, Sung
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 5, No 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v5i1.18145

The corruption case involving the former North Konawe regent, Aswad Sulaiman, was acquitted by the Kendari Corruption Court in 2017, according to decision Number 56/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Kdi. While the Supreme Court Cassation decision number 1964 K/PID.SUS/2017 decided that Defendant Aswad Sulaiman was proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a crime by jointly committing an ongoing criminal act of corruption, imposing a prison sentence of 6 years and an IDR 200 million fine. If not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 6 months, punished for producing a compensation of IDR 3,310,639,545 (three billion three hundred ten million six hundred thirty-nine thousand five hundred and forty-five rupiah). This study focuses on the legal ratio of the panel of judges in imposing an acquittal in the corruption case Number 56/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Kdi and decision number 1964 K/PID.SUS/2017. This study used normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach, Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, which was last amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. The results are that the recovery of state financial losses must be investigated as the starting point that the defendant has committed corruption by not releasing him from criminal responsibility but only as a basis for mitigating considerations for the defendant. The judges deciding this case have at least gone through 3 stages: constating, qualifying, and constituting.

Punishment Under Special Minimum Criminal Threat In the Crime of Child Abuse (Study of Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020) Rosman Ahmad; Hariman Satria; Faisal Abdaud; Mafardin Mafardin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 3 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.4909

The imposition of a penalty below the special minimum in the crime of molestation of children is a very important issue in criminal law. This crime aims to provide more effective protection to victims of immorality involving children. In some cases of child abuse, the judge handed down a verdict below the special minimum. The offense that is the focus of this study is how the judge considers sentencing under the special minimum criminal threat based on Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020 in the case of criminal acts of child abuse? The research method used is a type of normative legal research using 2 (two) legal approaches, namely the legislative approach and the case approach. The results of the study concluded that the Supreme Court in decision Number 1041/Pid.sus/2020 has strengthened the judex facti decision that imposes a penalty below the special minimum limit to the defendant so that the decision contradicts the provisions of Article 82 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection is the minimum limit of 5 (five) years and a maximum of 15 (fifteen) years.

Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Proof: Is It Reliable? Arifuddin Arifuddin; Hariman Satria; Faisal Abdaud
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 3 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5130

Proof is the backbone of criminal justice. Because any party who lacks evidence will lose in the court decision. In current judicial practice in Indonesia, there is a lot of discussion about indirect evidence. This term originates from the common law criminal law doctrine and is starting to be used by Indonesian academics when explaining criminal cases in court. The results of the study show that normatively, the Criminal Procedure Code does not recognize the distribution of evidence, either direct or indirect. In criminal justice practice, indirect evidence can be seen in its functionalization in two decisions, namely decision Number 498K/PID/2017. Indirect evidence used is in the form of: witness statements, expert statements, letters and instructions. Furthermore, decision Number 1813K/PID.SUS/2016. The indirect evidence used is documentary evidence and statements from several witnesses. In order not to cause errors in practice, direct evidence must be prioritized, not the other way around.

CYBER DEFAMATION IN INDONESIA'S NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NEW PROVISIONS Abdaud, Faisal; Haris, Oheo Kaimuddin
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 26, No 3: December 2024: Law and Justice in Digital Age
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v26i3.34004

This article investigates the impact of cyber defamation regulations within Indonesia's National Criminal Code (NCC), a topic worthy of investigation due to the significant changes in the definition and scope of cyber defamation offenses following the NCC's enactment. Through a normative legal research approach, the study examines legal rules, principles, and doctrines, employing both statutory and conceptual analyses. The findings indicate that the NCC's provisions on cyber defamation, as lex generalis, take precedence over Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) Act, while Article 27A of the Second Amendment to the ITE Law remains in provisional effect until the NCC's full implementation in 2026. Notably, cyber defamation is addressed in seven articles (Articles 433-439) within the NCC, which also specifically cover defamation against the President, government, and state institutions. To mitigate potential ambiguities, the development of implementing regulations is recommended to clarify the application of these NCC defamation provisions. The changes align with established legal principles, ensuring a coherent and effective regulatory framework. This article contributes to a deeper understanding of the NCC's new cyber defamation provisions by analyzing their scope, implications, and the need for implementing regulations to ensure consistent and effective application.

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 12 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search