Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

Punishment Under Special Minimum Criminal Threat In the Crime of Child Abuse (Study of Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020) Rosman Ahmad; Hariman Satria; Faisal Abdaud; Mafardin Mafardin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.4909

Abstract

The imposition of a penalty below the special minimum in the crime of molestation of children is a very important issue in criminal law. This crime aims to provide more effective protection to victims of immorality involving children. In some cases of child abuse, the judge handed down a verdict below the special minimum. The offense that is the focus of this study is how the judge considers sentencing under the special minimum criminal threat based on Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020 in the case of criminal acts of child abuse? The research method used is a type of normative legal research using 2 (two) legal approaches, namely the legislative approach and the case approach. The results of the study concluded that  the Supreme Court in decision Number 1041/Pid.sus/2020 has strengthened the judex facti decision that imposes a penalty below the special minimum limit to the defendant so that the decision contradicts the provisions of Article 82 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection is the minimum limit of 5 (five) years and a maximum of 15 (fifteen) years.
Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Proof: Is It Reliable? Arifuddin Arifuddin; Hariman Satria; Faisal Abdaud
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5130

Abstract

Proof is the backbone of criminal justice. Because any party who lacks evidence will lose in the court decision. In current judicial practice in Indonesia, there is a lot of discussion about indirect evidence. This term originates from the common law criminal law doctrine and is starting to be used by Indonesian academics when explaining criminal cases in court. The results of the study show that normatively, the Criminal Procedure Code does not recognize the distribution of evidence, either direct or indirect. In criminal justice practice, indirect evidence can be seen in its functionalization in two decisions, namely decision Number 498K/PID/2017. Indirect evidence used is in the form of: witness statements, expert statements, letters and instructions. Furthermore, decision Number 1813K/PID.SUS/2016. The indirect evidence used is documentary evidence and statements from several witnesses. In order not to cause errors in practice, direct evidence must be prioritized, not the other way around.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Onslag Van Rechtvervolging Terhadap Perkara Penipuan dan Penggelapan : (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Tenggara Nomor: 168/PID/2021/PT KDI) Ramlin Ramlin; Kamaruddin Kamaruddin; Faisal Abdaud
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1151

Abstract

This study examines the decision of the Kendari High Court No. 168/PID/2021/PT KDI, which issued an onslag van rechtvervolging decision regarding allegations of fraud and embezzlement. This research employs doctrinal law research methods, incorporating legislative and conceptual approaches. The study's results indicate that the defendant, M. Ikhtiar's, actions are more appropriately categorised as defaults in business agreements, where the court affirms that not all uncertainties in transactions reflect malicious intent. This decision provides legal protection for the defendant, while the victim, Ilham Iskandar, faces challenges in recovering losses. The implications of this ruling underscore the importance of distinguishing between criminal and civil disputes, while also encouraging the legal system to be more responsive to the complexities of commercial relationships
Tinjauan Yuridis Prinsip Pemilik Manfaat (Benefit Ownership) Dalam Hukum Pidana Korporasi Akmal; Abdaud, Faisal; Huzaiman
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the era of globalisation, corporations are often involved in criminal acts such as corruption and money laundering, making it important to understand the role of beneficial ownership principles in corporate criminal law in Indonesia. This study aims to analyse the application of beneficial ownership principles, the challenges faced, and their implications for accountability and transparency in corporate governance practices. This study uses a normative research method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results show that although Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 requires the disclosure of beneficial owners, there is still ambiguity in the definition and a lack of strict sanctions that hinder the effective application of this principle. Identifying beneficial owners can increase transparency and accountability, but challenges in law enforcement remain, including complex ownership structures that make it difficult to identify responsible individuals. This study recommends legal reforms to strengthen corporate responsibility and improve law enforcement understanding of the application of the beneficial ownership principle.
Menguak Realitas Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Abdaud, Faisal
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Traffic accidents resulting in fatalities are categorized as serious traffic accidents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reality of criminal liability in cases of traffic accidents resulting in fatalities where the victim's family and the perpetrator's family agree to settle. This study uses a normative legal research type. This qualitative study uses a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study show that the traffic accident case involving the perpetrator and victim "NA" is classified as a serious traffic accident resulting in fatalities as stipulated in Article 229 paragraph (4) of the UULLAJ. According to the provisions in the UULLAJ, there is no clause that allows serious traffic accident cases to be settled amicably. The provision of material compensation to the heirs of "NA" in the form of medical and/or funeral expenses is an obligation as stipulated in Article 235 paragraph (1) of the UULLAJ without waiving the criminal charges, so the provision of compensation is a form of responsibility that can be taken into consideration as a mitigating factor by the judge in court.
Legal Analysis of the Crime of Sexual Intercourse Against a Child by a Stepfather (Decision Study Number 13/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wgw) Saritma, Yogi Witma; Faisal Abdaud; Rahim, Abdul Jabar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.5369

Abstract

Children must be protected from all sorts of cruel treatment that lead to violations of human rights since they are the future generation of the country and are its buds, potential, and young people. Children that get harsh treatment will never grow or develop in the future. In Indonesia, instances involving the inhumane treatment of children are common. Case number 13/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wgw is one such case that is pending at the Wangi-Wangi District Court. This case involves the stepfather (DEFENDANT LL) engaging in illicit sexual relations with a minor (CHILD VICTIM A). Whether the judge's decision to charge the defendant with a crime was in line with the law at hand is the wording of the research problem. Furthermore, how is the case Number 13/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wgw analyzed using the theories of ratio decidendi and child protection? Using both a statutory and a case approach, this research methodology is normative. The Judge Panel in case number 13/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wgw sentenced DEFENDANT LL in conformity with the law that was in effect at the time. dependent on the first alternative indictment article's definition of a criminal act, this is dependent on all of those components being met. Based on a child protection theory analysis of case number 13/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wgw, it can be concluded that defendant LL's acts have stunted the physical, mental, and social development of child victim A. Meanwhile, the judges have examined the facts based on the evidence presented during the trial, applying the Ratio Decidendi Theory. As a result, they are confident in declaring that DEFENDANT LL has been legally and credibly proven to have committed a criminal act against CHILD VICTIM A.
Analisis Limitasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Kejahatan Manipulasi Digital di Indonesia Radyananda, Basya; Abdaud, Faisal; Dagani, Gamlan
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v6i1.4273

Abstract

Perkembangan kecerdasan buatan membuka peluang penyalahgunaan teknologi seperti deepfake dan manipulasi digital yang semakin sulit dideteksi. Namun, hukum pidana Indonesia masih bertumpu pada kesalahan individual manusia, sehingga belum mampu menjangkau tindakan yang dihasilkan oleh sistem otomatis. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi dasar pembenaran pertanggungjawaban pidana yang berlaku dan merumuskan batasan tanggung jawab hukum atas tindakan kecerdasan buatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa UU ITE No. 1 Tahun 2024 dan KUHP terbaru belum mengatur secara memadai kegagalan yang bersumber dari sistem kecerdasan buatan. Penelitian ini menawarkan prinsip kendali manusia yang bermakna dan audit algoritma sebagai instrumen pembuktian. Diperlukan regulasi berbasis risiko yang memisahkan tanggung jawab pengembang dan pengguna, disertai mekanisme perlindungan hukum yang menjamin kepastian tanpa menghambat inovasi teknologi.
A Criminological Review of Futures Investment Fraud: Digital Platform Exploitation and Social Engineering Pagala, Maghfirah Ramadhayanti; Abdaud, Faisal; Huzaiman, Huzaiman
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 8 No 1: April - September 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v8i1.698

Abstract

Futures investment fraud has evolved from a conventional economic offense into a systemic financial crisis exploiting the public’s psychological vulnerabilities and absence of digital literacy. This research aims to synthesize the criminological anatomy of these crimes, unveil social engineering tactics within cyber ecosystems, and formulate adaptive legal policy prescriptions to restore victims’ rights. Utilizing a socio-legal research design based on a literature review, the secondary data corpus is analyzed qualitatively by integrating a statute approach and a conceptual approach toward positive law instruments and reputable international journal literature. The research results prove that crime syndicates exploit white-collar anomic pressure through the creation of multi-level recruitment structures, which are subsequently amplified via cultural pseudo-legitimacy and algorithmic manipulation. These exploitation tactics are sustained by information asymmetry and jurisdictional uncertainty within financial supervisory institutions, which subsequently generates a silence cycle among victims due to the impediment of transnational law enforcement by law enforcement agencies. Halting the continuous cycle of these fictitious investment crimes necessitates a sentencing paradigm shift toward the optimization of asset recovery instruments through the application of money laundering criminal offense regulations. These repressive efforts must be synergistically integrated with mutual legal assistance instruments and the enforcement of anti-fraud firewalls at the financial service sector corporate level.
Criminal Liability for Doxing Perpetrators as a Form of CrimeCyber ​​Crime: A Study of Criminal Law in Indonesia Anfathurrahman M. Thohari; Faisal Abdaud; Huzaiman
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/dsvbx789

Abstract

Cybercrime is a crime or illegal activity committed through electronic networks, particularly the internet, with cross-border characteristics and is difficult to trace. The rapid development of information technology has led to an increase in the complexity and quantity of cybercrimes, one of which is doxing, namely the act of spreading someone's personal data without permission through digital media that can cause material and immaterial losses to the victim. In the context of Indonesian law, doxing can be qualified as a crime based on laws and regulations governing information and electronic transactions and personal data protection. Law enforcement against perpetrators is carried out through the imposition of criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and/or fines as a form of accountability for the actions committed. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of implementing criminal sanctions against doxing perpetrators in order to reduce the number of cybercrimes and prevent the repetition of criminal acts (recidivism). The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. The research results show that even though regulations are in place, the effectiveness of law enforcement still faces various obstacles, such as limited law enforcement capabilities, lack of public awareness, and faster technological developments than regulations. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize law enforcement, increase digital literacy, and update adaptive regulations to address doxing crimes more effectively.