Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum Al-'Adl Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Jurnal Inovasi Sains dan Teknologi (INSTEK) Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Abdaud, Faisal
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Proof: Is It Reliable? Arifuddin Arifuddin; Hariman Satria; Faisal Abdaud
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5130

Abstract

Proof is the backbone of criminal justice. Because any party who lacks evidence will lose in the court decision. In current judicial practice in Indonesia, there is a lot of discussion about indirect evidence. This term originates from the common law criminal law doctrine and is starting to be used by Indonesian academics when explaining criminal cases in court. The results of the study show that normatively, the Criminal Procedure Code does not recognize the distribution of evidence, either direct or indirect. In criminal justice practice, indirect evidence can be seen in its functionalization in two decisions, namely decision Number 498K/PID/2017. Indirect evidence used is in the form of: witness statements, expert statements, letters and instructions. Furthermore, decision Number 1813K/PID.SUS/2016. The indirect evidence used is documentary evidence and statements from several witnesses. In order not to cause errors in practice, direct evidence must be prioritized, not the other way around.
Tinjauan Yuridis Prinsip Pemilik Manfaat (Benefit Ownership) Dalam Hukum Pidana Korporasi Akmal; Abdaud, Faisal; Huzaiman
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the era of globalisation, corporations are often involved in criminal acts such as corruption and money laundering, making it important to understand the role of beneficial ownership principles in corporate criminal law in Indonesia. This study aims to analyse the application of beneficial ownership principles, the challenges faced, and their implications for accountability and transparency in corporate governance practices. This study uses a normative research method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results show that although Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 requires the disclosure of beneficial owners, there is still ambiguity in the definition and a lack of strict sanctions that hinder the effective application of this principle. Identifying beneficial owners can increase transparency and accountability, but challenges in law enforcement remain, including complex ownership structures that make it difficult to identify responsible individuals. This study recommends legal reforms to strengthen corporate responsibility and improve law enforcement understanding of the application of the beneficial ownership principle.
Menguak Realitas Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Mengakibatkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Abdaud, Faisal
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Februari, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Traffic accidents resulting in fatalities are categorized as serious traffic accidents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the reality of criminal liability in cases of traffic accidents resulting in fatalities where the victim's family and the perpetrator's family agree to settle. This study uses a normative legal research type. This qualitative study uses a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study show that the traffic accident case involving the perpetrator and victim "NA" is classified as a serious traffic accident resulting in fatalities as stipulated in Article 229 paragraph (4) of the UULLAJ. According to the provisions in the UULLAJ, there is no clause that allows serious traffic accident cases to be settled amicably. The provision of material compensation to the heirs of "NA" in the form of medical and/or funeral expenses is an obligation as stipulated in Article 235 paragraph (1) of the UULLAJ without waiving the criminal charges, so the provision of compensation is a form of responsibility that can be taken into consideration as a mitigating factor by the judge in court.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rustan Ahmad, Rosman Akmal Arifuddin Arifuddin Hariman Satria, Hariman Huzaiman Huzaiman, Huzaiman Mafardin Mafardin Mafardin, Mafardin Ming-Hsi Sung Ming-Hsi, Sung Muhammad Arif Muhammad Rais Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Oheo Kaimuddin Parman Parman Rosman Ahmad Satria, Hariman Wahyudi Umar