Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Hubungan Antara Ipk Sarjana Kedokteran Dan Program Profesi Dokter Dengan Nilai CBT Uji Kompetensi Program Profesi Dokter Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kristen Maranatha Tih, Fen; Waty, Wenny; Valerie, Rachel; Sanjaya, Ardo; Gunadi, Julia Windi
Jurnal Medika Malahayati Vol 9, No 1 (2025): Volume 9 Nomor 1
Publisher : Universitas Malahayati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33024/jmm.v9i1.18157

Tahapan untuk menjadi dokter perlu melewati tahap sarjana kedokteran lalu program profesi dokter dan diakhiri dengan ujian UKMPPD sebelum akhirnya disumpah dokter. Pada kenyataannya terdapat banyak mahasiswa fakultas kedokteran yang tidak lulus UKMPPD sementara berdasarkan IPK pada tahap sarjana kedokteran dan program profesi dokter dinyatakan lulus. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui ada tidaknya korelasi antara IPK sarjana kedokteran dan program profesi dengan nilai CBT UKMPPD. Data diambil pada 2022 di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kristen Maranatha. Penelitian ini melibatkan 1.183 mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kristen Maranatha yang mengikuti UKMPPD pada tahun 2016 sampai tahun 2022. Pengolahan data sekunder dilakukan dengan metode analisis bivariat dan multivariat. IPK sarjana kedokteran dan IPK program profesi dokter memiliki korelasi signifikan dengan nilai CBT UKMPPD. Pada tahap Pendidikan profesi seharusnya dalam hal praktik tetap melakukan tindakan sesuai dengan teori yang ada agar sesuai dan relevan dengan pembelajaran teori pada tahap akademik dan CBT UKMPPD.

Comparison of Global Rating Assessment Between Examiners and Simulated Patients on Communication Skills with OSCE Scores: Perbandingan Penilaian Global Rating Antara Penguji dan Pasien Simulasi Pada Keterampilan Komunikasi Dengan Nilai OSCE Waty, Wenny; Hutagalung, Albert Rodney; Tih, Fen; Sanjaya, Ardo; Gunadi, Julia Windi
Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Vol 17 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan
Publisher : Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jik.v17i1.2303

Introduction: In the field of medical education, the evaluation process of communication and clinical skills training is known as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). OSCE can be assessed using the global rating method, which is a method of subjective evaluation by examiners and standardized patients of student performance. Objective: The study aims to examine the relationship between the subjectivity of examiners and standardized patients in OSCE scores using the global rating method. Methods: The study involved 985 students from the Faculty of Medicine at Maranatha Christian University who participated in the Local OSCE from December 2021 until January 2022. Secondary data were analyzed using logistic regression in SPSS software and presented in tables and multivariate analysis. Results: The global rating assessment by examiners showed a significant relationship with OSCE scores (p<0.001), while the global rating assessment by standardized patients did not show a significant relationship with OSCE scores (p>0.05). This indicates that the evaluation by examiners has a greater influence on OSCE results compared to the assessment by standardized patients. Recommendations: More comprehensive training is needed for standardized patients in conducting assessments using the global rating method to minimize bias. Furthermore, future research is recommended to explore other factors that may influence OSCE assessments to improve the validity and reliability of the evaluation.

GPA AS A STRONGER DETERMINANT OF MEDICAL DOCTOR COMPUTER-BASED NATIONAL COMPETENCE TEST Tih, Fen; Waty, Wenny; Rizamena, Melya Ikbar; Sanjaya, Ardo; Gunadi, Julia Windi
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 14, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.99188

Background: The government implements a high-quality assurance system in the health sector to strengthen the national education system. One of the steps is the Indonesian Medical Doctor National Competency Examination (known as UKMPPD in Indonesia), which follows regulations on higher education and health workers. The entrance exam for medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Maranatha Christian University, consists of a biology test and an academic potential test.Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the biology entrance exam, academic potential test, and grade point average with the final score of UKMPPD CBT at the Faculty of Medicine, Maranatha Christian University. Methods: The samples collected consisted of students from the Faculty of Medicine at Maranatha Christian University, from the 2010 to 2016 classes, who took the UKMPPD from 2016 to 2022. Data were analyzed using the Spearman test and examined for both bivariate and multivariate relationships.Results: This study showed that the biology entrance examination, medical undergraduate GPA, and medical professional GPA influenced the UKMPPD CBT final score of Maranatha Christian University Faculty of Medicine students. Nevertheless, there is no relationship between students’ TPA score and UKMPPD CBT.Conclusion: Medical undergraduate GPA had the strongest relationship with CBT scores, compared to medical professional GPA. This study also highlighted the importance of non-cognitive aspects of input selection tests besides the improvement of the quality of the clinical education evaluation process.

Comparison of Global Rating Assessment Between Examiners and Simulated Patients on Communication Skills with OSCE Scores: Perbandingan Penilaian Global Rating Antara Penguji dan Pasien Simulasi Pada Keterampilan Komunikasi Dengan Nilai OSCE Waty, Wenny; Hutagalung, Albert Rodney; Tih, Fen; Sanjaya, Ardo; Gunadi, Julia Windi
Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Vol 17 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan
Publisher : Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/jik.v17i1.2303

Introduction: In the field of medical education, the evaluation process of communication and clinical skills training is known as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). OSCE can be assessed using the global rating method, which is a method of subjective evaluation by examiners and standardized patients of student performance. Objective: The study aims to examine the relationship between the subjectivity of examiners and standardized patients in OSCE scores using the global rating method. Methods: The study involved 985 students from the Faculty of Medicine at Maranatha Christian University who participated in the Local OSCE from December 2021 until January 2022. Secondary data were analyzed using logistic regression in SPSS software and presented in tables and multivariate analysis. Results: The global rating assessment by examiners showed a significant relationship with OSCE scores (p<0.001), while the global rating assessment by standardized patients did not show a significant relationship with OSCE scores (p>0.05). This indicates that the evaluation by examiners has a greater influence on OSCE results compared to the assessment by standardized patients. Recommendations: More comprehensive training is needed for standardized patients in conducting assessments using the global rating method to minimize bias. Furthermore, future research is recommended to explore other factors that may influence OSCE assessments to improve the validity and reliability of the evaluation.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search