Firdaus, Muhamad Iqbal Ansori
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reformasi Kelembagaan DPD RI Menuju Penguatan Peran dan Fungsi Legislasi dalam Sistem Bikameral Indonesia Firdaus, Muhamad Iqbal Ansori; Khumaeroh, Irda Nur
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 3: April 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i3.7958

Abstract

Reformasi kelembagaan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (DPD RI) menjadi isu strategis dalam upaya memperkuat peran dan fungsi legislasi dalam sistem bikameral Indonesia. Saat ini, peran DPD RI sebagai bagian dari sistem parlemen dianggap kurang optimal, terutama dalam aspek legislasi. Keterbatasan kewenangan DPD RI yang diatur dalam konstitusi menciptakan ketimpangan dalam representasi antara kepentingan nasional dan daerah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi posisi kelembagaan DPD RI serta mengusulkan langkah-langkah strategis untuk memperkuat fungsinya. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, serta literatur akademik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penguatan fungsi legislasi DPD RI memerlukan reformasi pada beberapa aspek, termasuk amandemen konstitusi untuk memperluas kewenangan legislasi DPD RI, peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan, serta pembentukan mekanisme kolaborasi yang lebih baik dengan DPR RI. Reformasi ini juga harus diiringi oleh peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia di lingkungan DPD RI agar mampu menjalankan fungsi legislasi secara efektif. Penguatan fungsi legislasi DPD RI sangat penting untuk menciptakan sistem bikameral yang seimbang dan inklusif, sehingga dapat memperkuat representasi daerah dalam pengambilan keputusan nasional. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi strategis bagi pengambil kebijakan dalam mengimplementasikan reformasi kelembagaan DPD RI.
Dinamika Hukum Isbat Cerai Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Asas Sederhana Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Sobirin, Lisda Apriliani; Napiah, Ilman; Taufik, Taufik; Firdaus, Muhamad Iqbal Ansori
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1861

Abstract

This study examines the legal dynamics of isbat cerai (validation of unregistered divorce) through a philosophical review of the simple, fast, and low cost (SCBR) principle within Indonesia’s Religious Courts. The high prevalence of unregistered divorces creates an urgent need for retroactive recognition; however, the implementation of isbat cerai remains constrained by regulatory fragmentation, rigid evidentiary standards, and judicial interpretations that tend to be formalistic. Constitutionally, the SCBR principle serves as an instrument for fulfilling the right to access to justice, ideally aligning with the Islamic legal maxims of taysīr (facilitation) and rafʿ al ḥaraj (removal of hardship) within maqāṣid al sharīʿah. Employing a normative legal method with a doctrinal analytical design, this research synthesizes procedural justice theory, utilitarianism, and Islamic legal philosophy to comprehensively examine the alignment between legal norms and judicial practice. The analysis reveals a philosophical tension between formal legal certainty and substantive justice, wherein complex procedures disproportionately marginalize petitioners from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Furthermore, digital transformation through the e-Court system has yet to address the restructuring of substantive case examinations, meaning that administrative efficiency does not automatically guarantee substantive justice. The study concludes that the SCBR principle must be constructed as a binding judicial interpretive guideline rather than merely an administrative directive. Strategic recommendations include the application of teleological interpretation, cost standardization based on petitioners' economic capacity, and the simplification of evidentiary procedures. This research bridges the dichotomy between legal formalism and substantive justice, while simultaneously offering a philosophical foundation for a more inclusive and socially responsive reform of the Religious Courts. These findings are expected to serve as a policy reference for the Supreme Court in drafting technical guidelines for isbat cerai that prioritize substantive justice.