Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penangkapan dan Penahanan Demonstran dalam Perspektif Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Varik Farsyak; Ariel Lian Pratama; Aldo Kurniawan
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Juli - September
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the legal issues surrounding the arrest and detention of demonstrators, which have the potential to violate human rights in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods with historical, case-based, and analytical approaches, this study analyzes the gap between progressive legal norms and repressive practices in the field. The results show that the arrest and detention of demonstrators often violate human rights due to several factors: first, the gap in implementation between the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and international human rights standards and field practice; second, the weak understanding of human rights principles by officials and the lack of adequate training; and third, the practice of mass arrests without clear procedures, which contradicts the principle of individual criminal responsibility. This study identifies three legal mechanisms to provide protection: preventive measures through internal and external oversight; repressive measures through pretrial and criminal legal remedies; and restorative measures through mediation and institutional reform. The effectiveness of these mechanisms is hampered by institutional independence, procedural accessibility, institutional capacity, and public legal awareness. This study recommends comprehensive reform of the human rights protection system, strengthening oversight, and shifting the paradigm of handling demonstrations from a repressive approach to a human rights-based approach.
Analisis Penyelenggaraan Penataan Ruang Wilayah Di Provinsi Bengkulu Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Muhammad Adrian Fitra Yamazaki; Aldo Kurniawan; Muhammad Syirazi Neyasyah; Edra Satmaidi; Ema Septaria
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/j-ceki.v5i3.16498

Abstract

Sentralisasi kewenangan dalam sektor mineral dan batubara pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 menimbulkan implikasi yuridis terhadap pelaksanaan otonomi daerah, khususnya dalam aspek pengawasan dan pengendalian kegiatan pertambangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis sentralisasi kewenangan terhadap efektivitas koordinasi antara pemerintah daerah dan pemerintah pusat, serta menilai efektivitas penegakan hukum lingkungan terhadap aktivitas pertambangan di Kabupaten Lebong, khususnya di kawasan penyangga Taman Nasional Kerinci Seblat (TNKS). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sentralisasi kewenangan telah mengurangi peran pemerintah daerah dalam pengawasan, sehingga menimbulkan celah pengendalian terhadap aktivitas pertambangan tanpa izin (PETI). Selain itu, penegakan hukum lingkungan belum berjalan efektif karena masih bersifat represif, parsial, dan belum menyentuh akar permasalahan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan koordinasi antarinstansi, optimalisasi instrumen penegakan hukum, serta kebijakan alternatif bagi masyarakat guna mendukung pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang berkelanjutan.
Tinjauan Hukum Pengaturan PPPK Paruh Waktu dan PPPK Penuh Waktu serta Dampaknya Terhadap Hak dan Kewajiban Pegawai Varik Farsyak; Muhammad Adrian Fitra Yamazaki; Aldo Kurniawan; Iskandar; Madinar
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.257

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the provisions of part-time and full-time Government Employees with Employment Agreements (PPPK) in the Indonesian civil service legal system and examine the legal implications of the differences in rights and obligations between the two. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, utilizing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively. The results show that full-time PPPK have a clear regulatory basis in laws and regulations, specifically in Law Number 20 of 2023 concerning the State Civil Apparatus and Government Regulation Number 49 of 2018. Meanwhile, part-time PPPK do not have explicit normative regulations, resulting in legal uncertainty. This difference has implications for an imbalance in rights and obligations, particularly regarding salaries, benefits, job protection, and certainty of tenure. This condition has the potential to cause injustice and contradicts the principle of legal certainty and the merit system in ASN management. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is needed to ensure justice, legal certainty, and protection of the rights of all PPPK.
Analisis Persetujuan Berusaha PT Ratu Samban Mining Bengkulu Tinjauan dari Hukum Tata Ruang Muhammad Adrian Fitra Yamazaki; Aldo Kurniawan; Adib Kumara Reisman; Fadel Jovinka; Edra Satmaidi
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.258

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal validity of the Business Approval of PT Ratu Samban Mining (RSM) from the perspective of Law Number 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that although PT RSM formally possesses a mining business permit, substantively there are indications of non-compliance with the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW), particularly concerning alleged operations in protected areas and the low post-mining reclamation rate of only 28.57%. Such inconsistencies may render the business approval legally void as stipulated in Article 37 paragraph (7) of the Spatial Planning Law. The legal implications include administrative sanctions, criminal liability, and obligations to restore spatial functions. Furthermore, the study identifies structural weaknesses in spatial planning supervision, including inadequate field verification and lack of institutional coordination. Therefore, strengthening supervision mechanisms, conducting periodic spatial audits, and improving policy harmonization are essential to ensure sustainable spatial utilization.
Kelemahan Konvensi Jenewa 1949 Dalam Menghadapi Dinamika Konflik Bersenjata Modern Muhammad Adrian fitra yamazaki; Aldo Kurniawan; Febrio Diosi Pratama
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the weaknesses of the 1949 Geneva Conventions in addressing the dynamics of modern armed conflicts and examines their relevance and effectiveness in providing legal protection for victims of armed conflicts. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the 1949 Geneva Conventions contain several limitations, particularly regarding the state-centric nature of legal subjects, the inability to fully accommodate modern military technological developments, and the limited enforcement mechanisms that lack coercive power. Nevertheless, the 1949 Geneva Conventions remain highly relevant within the international humanitarian law system, as reflected in the applicability of fundamental principles, the strengthening effect of the 1977 Additional Protocols, and their recognition in international practice as the primary instrument for the protection of victims of armed conflicts. However, the effectiveness of their implementation still reveals a gap between law in the books and law in action, influenced by the changing nature of armed conflicts and the limitations of international enforcement mechanisms.