Zulfahmi Bustami
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kritis Pasal 156 (C) KHI Mengenai Pemindahan Hak Asuh Anak dalam Konteks Penelantaran oleh Ibu: Perspektif Maqāshid Al-Syarī’ah Mitra Kurniawan; Zulfahmi Bustami; Sofia Hardani
Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/legitima.v5i2.3828

Abstract

Purpose – This study aimed to perform a critical analysis of Article 156 (c) of the Indonesian Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which exhibited a legal loophole. The article failed to clearly and unequivocally address the situation where the mother might be capable of caring for the child but the father, despite having the means, refused to provide support. Consequently, in cases where the mother lacked sufficient income, the child could be left abandoned. Methods – This research falls under the category of literature review within the field of Islamic studies, employing a qualitative normative approach. The methodology utilized for data processing and drawing conclusions was content analysis. Findings – The findings of the study underscored the necessity of examining the aforementioned issues through the lens of maqāshid al-syarī'ah, as they are intricately linked to the question of whether the mother's custody should be upheld or if it is more beneficial to transfer it to the party with similar custodial rights. This perspective is crucial as it considers the overarching objectives and principles of Islamic law, guiding the decision-making process towards outcomes that align with the broader aims of justice, welfare, and protection of the child's best interests. Research implications –The theoretical implications encompass the potential expansion of concepts and legal thoughts in Islamic law concerning the protection of children's rights, and provide a foundation for critical reflection on existing legal frameworks. Thus, the research findings may aid in the development of a more inclusive theory of Islamic law that aligns with principles of humanity and justice. Top of Form Originality/value – This study addresses a notable gap in Indonesian Islamic law concerning child custody rights, specifically regarding maternal abandonment. By critically analyzing Article 156 (c) of the Indonesian Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), the research identifies a legal loophole affecting children's welfare when mothers lack sufficient support. Unlike previous studies, this research integrates maqāshid al-syarī’ah principles, offering a comprehensive perspective.
Judicial Reluctance and Legal Gaps in Recognizing Gambling as a Ground for Divorce: An Islamic Law Analysis of Decisions of the Pekanbaru Religious Court Fadel Muhammad; Zulfahmi Bustami; Muhammad Darwis; Pujangga Candrawijayaning Fajri; Naimah Mohamad Nasir
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.32

Abstract

This study is motivated by the empirical finding that judges in the Religious Court Class 1A Pekanbaru do not explicitly use gambling as a legal ground for divorce, despite its inclusion in Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 Article 19(a) and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Article 116(a). Moreover, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage does not specifically recognize gambling as a cause of divorce, resulting in limited legal protection for affected parties. This research aims to analyze judicial reasoning and standards in adjudicating divorce cases involving gambling from an Islamic law perspective. This study employs a qualitative normative legal approach based on secondary data, utilizing statutory, case, and historical approaches. Data were collected through literature review and supported by interviews, and analyzed using qualitative analytical techniques to derive systematic and interpretative conclusions. The findings reveal that judges tend not to explicitly consider gambling as a primary ground for divorce, instead relying on arguments of continuous disputes and conflicts. Consequently, the normative provisions of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 Article 19(a) and KHI Article 116(a) are not optimally applied. From an Islamic law perspective, which prioritizes family welfare (maslahah), gambling can constitute a legitimate (syar’i) ground for divorce. In conclusion, there is a normative and practical gap in judicial application, indicating the need for legal reform. This study recommends strengthening legal provisions by explicitly incorporating gambling as a ground for divorce through amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 to ensure legal certainty and protection.