Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara International Journal of Disaster Management Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Kurniawati, Chandra Puspita
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Mengkritisi Proses Formulasi RUU tentang Penanggulangan Bencana dari Perspektif Kebijakan Publik Kurniawati, Chandra Puspita; Muhtar, Entang Adhy; Pancasilawan, Ramadhan
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i3.1188

Abstract

Lebih dari satu dekade Undang-Undang tentang Penanggulangan Bencana diimplementasikan. Namun demikian, penyelenggaraan penanggulangan bencana masih diwarnai oleh sederet masalah, pertanggungjawaban yang tidak transparan, perilaku koruptif, keterbatasan sumber daya, serta keterbatasan kapasitas para pihak terkait. Ditambah dengan tren peningkatan dampak bencana dan besarnya alokasi anggaran penanggulangan bencana, Indonesia menghadapi tantangan yang jauh lebih besar dan kompleks daripada apa yang terlihat saat ini. Merespons kondisi tersebut, Komisi VIII mengusulkan RUU tentang Penanggulangan Bencana untuk merevisi UU No. 24 Tahun 2007. Namun, proses panjang RUU tersebut berujung pada deadlock dan kritikan pedas dari sejumlah pihak, sehingga menimbulkan pertanyaan terkait bagaimana proses formulasi RUU tentang Penanggulangan Bencana tersebut dijalankan. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses formulasi kebijakan tidak sepenuhnya dijalankan oleh Badan Keahlian dan Legislatif. Selain itu, langkah formulasi kebijakan juga tidak berurutan dan tidak terkait satu sama lain. Hasil analisis juga mengungkapkan adanya kelemahan yang signifikan dalam POS, proses, dan tools yang digunakan oleh Badan Keahlian dan Legislatif untuk memformulasikan RUU tersebut. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perbaikan mekanisme formulasi kebijakan dan pemanfaatan tools yang relevan, baik oleh Badan Keahlian maupun Legislatif.
Evolutionary Study of Three Decades Literatures Related to Disaster Management Agency and Public Policy: A Bibliometric Study Kurniawati, Chandra Puspita; Muhtar, Entang Adhy; Pancasilawan, Ramadhan
International Journal of Disaster Management Vol 6, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : TDMRC, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/ijdm.v6i1.31783

Abstract

This study is aimed at examining scientific literatures written by international authors focusing on disaster management agency topic that are related to public policy from the first paper published in 1995 to 2022 using bibliometric study employing a database from Scopus. To visualize the results, this study utilizes VOSviewer version 1.6.17. The results showed that this topic emerged in Thailand which focused on roles of local level disaster management agency in carrying out rehabilitation and reconstruction activities in district level. However, Federal Emergency Management Agency, or the United States Disaster Management Agency, was considered to be the most researched disaster management agency. Besides, open-access social science articles dominated the type of publications in this research area. Moreover, the United States and its authors were perceived as the most productive and influential country and authors. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom was recognized as the most influential sources title with Journal Disasters served the most productive and influential source title. Besides, the affiliation among Austria, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United States were acknowledged as the most productive and influential affiliations. The analysis also indicated that this topic developed and strongly connected to disaster and disaster management research areas. Considering the comprehensive nature of bibliometric analysis, this study may help scholars get a broad view of the relevant issues, while at the same time identifying reputable publications worth studying for reference.
KAJIAN PERMASALAHAN KEBIJAKAN PENETAPAN STATUS BENCANA, KELEMBAGAAN BPBD, DAN PENGELOLAAN BANTUAN PASCA TERBITNYA UU NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2007 Kurniawati, Chandra Puspita
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.19

Abstract

A disaster may lead to other disasters. This causes the community to suffer from disaster. The government needs a huge amount of funds to manage disaster and recover the affected communities. However, a number of phenomena that were confirmed to be disaster will provide an impact on funding disaster-related activities and the distribution of resources. In addition, institution related issues on local disaster management agency and unprofessional disaster-related aid management may affect the accountability and transparency of disaster and disaster-related aid management. This study employs a literature review on the policies related to disaster management. The results show that disaster status should be endorsed based on clear definition and parameters as it is mandated on Law No. 24 the Year 2007. In addition, improving local disaster management agency's function and authority and adopting standards or best practices on disaster-related aid management should also be taken into account to promote accountability and transparency of disaster management.ABSTRAKBencana dapat memicu risiko terjadinya bencana yang lain. Kondisi tersebut mengakibatkan setiap tahunnya masyarakat menderita akibat bencana. Pemerintah mutlak memerlukan dana dalam jumlah besar untuk menanggulangi bencana dan memulihkan wilayah pascabencana. Permasalahannya ialah banyaknya kejadian yang ditetapkan sebagai bencana akan berdampak pada pendanaan dan distribusi sumber daya. Selain itu, permasalahan kelembagaan Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) dan pengelolaan bantuan bencana yang tidak profesional dapat berpengaruh pula pada akuntabilitas dan transparansi penyelenggaraan penanggulangan bencana dan pengelolaan bantuan bencana. Kajian ini dilakukan melalui studi literatur tentang kebijakan-kebijakan yang terkait dengan penanggulangan bencana. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa status bencana perlu ditetapkan berdasarkan definisi dan parameter yang jelas sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang -Undang (UU) No. 24 Tahun 2007. Sebagai tambahan, peningkatan fungsi dan wewenang BPBD dan pengadopsian standar atau praktik terbaik pengelolaan bantuan bencana juga perlu dilakukan untuk meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan transparansi penyelenggaraan penanggulangan bencana.
Investigating accountability of state subsidies for political parties Kurniawati, Chandra Puspita; Sandha, Oktarika Ayoe; Suntharanurak, Sutthi; Muhtar, Entang Adhy; Pancasilawan, Ramadhan
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JTAKEN Vol. 9 No. 2 December 2023
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v9i2.1241

Abstract

Regulations stipulate that a political party must prepare financial reports to facilitate sound financial management and accountability of the state subsidies it receives. However, its accountability remains problematic, raising a question: How do the related policies deal with the accountability of state subsidies for political parties? This study aims to evaluate issues related to accountability in the policies governing the management of state subsidies for political parties. This study is normative legal research. Within a meta-analysis framework, critical analysis of the relevant policies in the form of laws and regulations and other reliable sources of information is carried out. The study finds that the policies provide rules to ensure eligible political parties’ right to obtain state subsidies and employ audit and administrative sanctions to enhance state subsidy accountability. Nevertheless, the policies still overlook important issues related to vertical accountability of political parties and government, horizontal accountability of government, internal control mechanisms, supervision requirements, and formal and material responsibilities by relevant in-charge parties. Moreover, the running audit practices do not provide much value for improvement. This study provides policy-makers with a new perspective on relevant studies so that the government will consider the comprehensive management of state subsidies for political parties by relevant in-charge parties before elevating the value of the subsidies.
Co-Authors Muhtar, Entang Adhy Ramadhan Pancasilawan Sandha, Oktarika Ayoe Suntharanurak, Sutthi