Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Kontrak Elektronik Perusahaan Di Era Digitalisasi Atmarivaldi Rosel; Reyza Darfebryanto; Abid Aulia Hilmi; Rival; Helvira Citra
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Januari - Maret
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan digitalisasi telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam cara perusahaan berinteraksi dengan konsumen, terutama dalam konteks kontrak elektronik. Kontrak elektronik kini menjadi sarana utama dalam transaksi bisnis di era digital, tetapi perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak ini masih menjadi isu yang perlu perhatian lebih. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis aspek yuridis perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak elektronik yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan di Indonesia, serta untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan yang dihadapi konsumen dalam transaksi digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan metode penelitian kepustakaan, menganalisis berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur kontrak elektronik dan perlindungan konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada peraturan yang mengatur kontrak elektronik, seperti Undang-Undang ITE dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, implementasi perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak elektronik masih kurang optimal. Hal ini disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor, antara lain kurangnya pemahaman konsumen tentang hak-hak mereka dalam transaksi digital dan kelemahan pengawasan terhadap praktik bisnis yang tidak transparan. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya pembaharuan regulasi dan peningkatan kesadaran hukum baik bagi konsumen maupun perusahaan agar perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak elektronik dapat terjamin dengan baik.
Pelaksanaan Pembebasan Bersyarat Bagi Narapidana Penyalahguna Narkotika Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas Iia Padang Rival; Marwenny, Elwidarifa
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Parole is one form of integration rights for inmates that allows them to serve the remainder of their prison sentence outside the correctional facility under certain conditions. Narcotics inmates applying for parole have increased in the last 3 (three) years at Class IIA Correctional Facility Padang, even though narcotics crimes are categorized as extraordinary crimes that should receive special attention in both sentencing and correctional processes. This raises concerns that it may weaken efforts to combat narcotics. Integration rights such as parole should be granted with great caution and selectivity. However, this policy tends to become routine without considering its impact on the legal system as a whole. This situation raises concerns about the loose implementation of the parole policy which may blur the essence of the rehabilitation process and weaken the national strategy in combating narcotics. In accordance with Government Regulation Number 99 of 2012 concerning the Requirements and Procedures for the Implementation of the Rights of Correctional Inmates, narcotics inmates can only be granted parole if they meet special requirements, including a willingness to cooperate in uncovering narcotics crime networks. This paper examines two problem formulations, namely: 1) how is the mechanism for parole for narcotics abuse inmates at Class IIA Correctional Facility Padang, 2) can all narcotics inmates be granted parole. To answer these issues, this study uses an empirical juridical approach resulting in the following conclusions: 1) referring to the provisions of the prevailing laws and regulations, namely Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 43 of 2021 concerning the Requirements and Procedures for the Granting of Remission, Assimilation, Family Visit Leave, and Parole. The procedure begins with the submission by the concerned inmate, followed by verification and assessment by the correctional officers and the Correctional Observer Team (TPP); 2) all narcotics inmates can be granted parole, namely those who are genuinely active and well-behaved during the rehabilitation process, while those who violate the rules, receive sanctions, and have their parole postponed for 9 (nine) months.