Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Komparatif Kebijakan Blue Carbon Di Indonesia Dan Meksiko Remember to Harefa; Timbul Dompak; Erwin Harefa; Lubna Salsabila
Prosiding Vol 6 (2024): SNISTEK
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Putera Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study does a comparative examination of blue carbon policies in Indonesia and Mexico, two countries well-known for their vast coastal ecosystems that are abundant in mangroves and seagrasses. This paper analyzes the policy frameworks, implementation techniques, and effects of blue carbon conservation efforts in both countries. Indonesia has enacted strong policies, such as the National Action Plan on Climate Change Adaptation and the National Mangrove Management Strategy, which prioritize community-based management and cooperation between the public and private sectors. This strategy has resulted in a rise in the extent of mangrove forests, improved the functioning of ecosystems, and strengthened the ability to capture and store carbon. In a similar vein, Mexico has implemented extensive frameworks through the National Climate Change Strategy and the General Law on Climate Change, which aim to foster collaboration among stakeholders and encourage the adoption of sustainable management practices. Positive developments in Mexico include the expansion of mangrove regions and the enhancement of biodiversity conservation. Notwithstanding these achievements, both countries continue to face problems in terms of securing long-term funding, ensuring effective coordination among stakeholders, and mitigating the implications of climate change. Subsequent studies should prioritize the improvement of governance structures, the enhancement of monitoring systems, and the expansion of successful initiatives to guarantee the enduring viability of global blue carbon conservation endeavors.
Perbandingan Sistem Politik Dan Demokrasi: Studi Kasus Indonesia Dan Filipina Dalam Konteks Sejarah Politik Dan Pemilihan Umum Erwin Harefa; Timbul Dompak; Remember To Harefa; Lubna Salsabila
Prosiding Vol 6 (2024): SNISTEK
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Putera Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia and the Philippines, both located in Southeast Asia, have a remarkably similar political history. Both nations are governed by authoritarian regimes. During that period, the electoral political system was established and comprehensively governed by all political components. Democracy has ceased to exist and is now closely linked to a political framework that is under the power of the government. The utilization of general elections as a metric can serve as an indication of the caliber of a nation's democratic system. If the elections in that country are conducted smoothly and citizens actively engage, then the country is seen as possessing commendable democratic attributes. This serves as a lesson for Indonesia and the Philippines to enhance the execution of elections and democracy by enacting more effective legislation and establishing a superior electoral system compared to the previous one. The electoral system is subject to constant adaptation based on the specific characteristics of each country, with the aim of establishing a system that is advantageous for the population.