Kittisak Wongmahesak
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Performance Accountability: Evaluation of Tourism Development in Indonesia Nadia Azzahra; Abdul Jabbar; Irwan; Ahmad Mustanir; Muh. Tamrin; Kittisak Wongmahesak
JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT SCIENCE Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54144/govsci.v6i1.104

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Accountability of performance in the tourism sector of the Youth, Sports, and Tourism Office of Sidenreng Rappang Regency to achieve transparent and effective regional development targets. This study used the concept of accountability. The qualitative approach was used; data was collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis from June to July 2024, and the data was analysed using the NVivo 12 Plus application. The study results revealed that Disporapar had achieved most of the targets set in the 2023 Regional Apparatus Work Plan despite facing obstacles such as budget limitations and the quality of human resources. Priority programs such as improving human resource competence, developing tourist areas, and implementing various trainings have been successfully implemented and have a positive impact on increasing regional tourism attractiveness. Performance accountability assessments are based on five dimensions: legal and honesty, managerial, programmatic, policy, and financial. The findings show that program accountability is the most dominant dimension, with the success of most programs in achieving the set goals. Legal Accountability, honesty, and managerial Accountability also showed good performance, although there was room for improvement in financial reporting and transparency. In conclusion, the Accountability of the performance of the Sidenreng Rappang Regency Disporapar is quite good in achieving regional tourism development targets. However, improvements in several aspects are needed to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of program implementation and the fulfillment of accountability obligations to the public.
Performance Accountability: Evaluation of Tourism Development in Indonesia Nadia Azzahra; Abdul Jabbar; Irwan; Ahmad Mustanir; Muh. Tamrin; Kittisak Wongmahesak
JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT SCIENCE Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54144/govsci.v6i1.104

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Accountability of performance in the tourism sector of the Youth, Sports, and Tourism Office of Sidenreng Rappang Regency to achieve transparent and effective regional development targets. This study used the concept of accountability. The qualitative approach was used; data was collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis from June to July 2024, and the data was analysed using the NVivo 12 Plus application. The study results revealed that Disporapar had achieved most of the targets set in the 2023 Regional Apparatus Work Plan despite facing obstacles such as budget limitations and the quality of human resources. Priority programs such as improving human resource competence, developing tourist areas, and implementing various trainings have been successfully implemented and have a positive impact on increasing regional tourism attractiveness. Performance accountability assessments are based on five dimensions: legal and honesty, managerial, programmatic, policy, and financial. The findings show that program accountability is the most dominant dimension, with the success of most programs in achieving the set goals. Legal Accountability, honesty, and managerial Accountability also showed good performance, although there was room for improvement in financial reporting and transparency. In conclusion, the Accountability of the performance of the Sidenreng Rappang Regency Disporapar is quite good in achieving regional tourism development targets. However, improvements in several aspects are needed to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of program implementation and the fulfillment of accountability obligations to the public.
Non-State Actor Resilience in Strengthening Food Security Governance Networks Novayanti Sopia Rukmana S; Syam, Febrianto; Nani Harlinda; Kittisak Wongmahesak
Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/pjiap.v11i1.16489

Abstract

Food security governance in Indonesia remains predominantly state-centered, leaving limited space for non-state actors such as Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to participate meaningfully in the policy process. This study examines the contribution and resilience of non-state actors in strengthening food security governance networks in a regency characterized by high agricultural potential yet persistent food security challenges. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach within an interpretivist paradigm, informants were selected through purposive sampling based on direct involvement in food security policy implementation. They comprised representatives from the local food security agency, CBOs engaged in community-level food programs, and NGOs focused on food issues and community empowerment. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, then examined using thematic analysis encompassing data reduction, actor categorization, and contribution mapping within a governance network framework. The findings reveal that non-state actors demonstrate high adaptive capacity through local initiatives including home garden utilization, traditional agriculture revitalization, and food diversification. However, their involvement remains sporadic and confined to the implementation stage. Structural barriers, notably inadequate incentives, weak coordination mechanisms, and limited deliberative space, prevent their strategic engagement in policymaking. This study contributes to the governance network literature by foregrounding the resilience of non-state actors and its implications for participatory food security governance. It argues for a transformation from symbolic participation toward substantive involvement across all policy stages, supported by institutional reforms and incentive schemes that strengthen collaborative governance in decentralized settings