Yurizka Melia Sari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Self-Evaluation Exit Tickets in Self-Organized Learning Environments (SOLEs) in Online Learning Nicky Dwi Puspaningtyas; Sugama Maskar; Putri Sukma Dewi; Yurizka Melia Sari
Jurnal Inovasi Matematika Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika)
Publisher : Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35438/inomatika.v6i2.459

Abstract

Effectiveness is one of the main problems in the online learning process. This becomes a benchmark for success in achieving learning objectives. Therefore, educators must be careful in choosing creative and innovative strategies both in terms of learning strategies and assessment strategies. Like the Self-Evaluation Exit Ticket assessment strategy which offers various advantages for educators and students. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of applying the Self-Evaluation Exit Ticket technique as an assessment strategy in learning. The subjects in this research were eighteen Mathematics Education students at a private higher education institution in Indonesia who took Number Theory courses online. Where, the material that will be covered in this course is the basic concept of congruence, complete residue systems, reduced residue systems, Euler's concept, and Euler's theorem. This type of research is quantitative descriptive. Based on the research results, all subjects experienced improvement while implementing the Self-Evaluation Exit Ticket assessment strategy. This increase was seen at meeting 2, namely as many as 55% of students were able to determine their learning outcomes, whereas previously at meeting 1 only 33% of students were able to determine their learning outcomes. Subjects thought that learning implemented using Self-Evaluation Exit Tickets was more fun, interesting, and encouraged subjects to continue learning. This means that the Self-Evaluation Exit Ticket assessment strategy can be effective and possible to apply in online learning.
Penalaran Analogi Peserta Didik SMP Kemampuan Matematika Rendah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended Topik Aljabar Ain, Zulfa Qurrotu; Masriyah; Yurizka Melia Sari
MATHEdunesa Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n1.p223-233

Abstract

Analogical reasoning is a person's thought process to draw conclusions by processing information and identifying factual relationships so that it can be used to solve problems. Analogical reasoning is important in solving mathematical problems. However, some studies show that analogical reasoning in low mathematics ability students still requires in-depth research, especially in solving problems. This study aims to describe the analogical reasoning of low mathematics ability students in solving open-ended problems on algebra topics. This study used a qualitative method with a case study approach, in which data were obtained through tests and interviews with one eighth-grade student with low mathematical ability. The subject was selected based on mathematical ability, communication skills, and problem-solving skills. Analogical reasoning was analyzed based on four stages according to Ruppert: structuring, mapping, applying, and verifying. The results of the analysis show that students with low mathematical ability only identify some of the information in the structuring stage, do not find similarities in structure in the mapping stage, use the wrong solution strategy in the applying stage, and do not check the solution in the verifying stage. This research is expected to lead to further studies that can explore analogical reasoning on various topics, classes, reviews, mathematics ability levels, and other open-ended problem categories to gain a deeper understanding of students' analogical reasoning.