Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Praktik Makelar Kasus Oleh Zarof Ricar Di Pengadilan Andryawan, Andryawan; Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva; Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda; Purba, Jeremy Exaudi
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 11 No 6.D (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the legal context, case brokering can be classified as a corruption offense because it refers to individuals who influence court decisions to win certain cases through unlawful means, such as bribery. In practice, case brokering involves intervening in the law enforcement process, from investigation to court decisions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal provisions regarding the practice of case brokering in court and the legal liability that can be imposed on Zarof Ricar for alleged case brokering practices. In this research we used the normative research method which focuses on the applicable legal rules related to the provisions and legal liability for the practice of case brokering in court. Through this research, it is concluded that Zarof's actions have violated the ASN code of ethics in accordance with applicable legal regulations and because his actions have undermined the principle of judicial independence, Zarof can be sanctioned for his actions. In addition, Zarof may also be subject to sanctions in the form of confiscation of assets obtained from corruption. Thus, to avoid such actions in the future, the Attorney General's Office and the Supreme Court must thoroughly investigate the practice of case brokering by Zarof Ricar and impose strict sanctions on the individuals involved.
Corporate Governance Failures Leading to Bankruptcy in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) Subsidiaries Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva; Gunadi, Ariawan
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12991

Abstract

General Background: Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is essential for ensuring corporate integrity and preventing financial distress, particularly within State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). Specific Background: Recent bankruptcy cases involving SOE subsidiaries reveal persistent weaknesses in transparency, accountability, and supervisory mechanisms, as exemplified by the collapse of PT Indofarma Global Medika (IGM). Knowledge Gap: Existing studies often assess fraud or GCG violations in isolation, lacking analysis that connects governance failures to legal and financial consequences within SOE parent–subsidiary structures. Aims: This study examines how suboptimal GCG implementation contributes to bankruptcy risks in SOE subsidiaries and evaluates the legal and managerial implications for parent entities. Results: Findings show that repeated fraud, inadequate risk management, and ineffective oversight created structural vulnerabilities that escalated into insolvency during the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations process. Novelty: The research establishes a direct causal link between GCG failure and subsidiary bankruptcy within the specific legal framework governing SOEs, highlighting accountability gaps in parent–subsidiary governance. Implications: Strengthening GCG enforcement is critical to safeguard state assets, enhance supervisory effectiveness, and prevent future insolvencies in SOE corporate groups. Highlights: Suboptimal GCG implementation in SOE subsidiaries significantly increases bankruptcy risk. Parent–subsidiary governance gaps weaken supervision and allow fraud to recur. Strengthening risk management and accountability is crucial to protect state assets. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, State-Owned Enterprises, Bankruptcy, Parent–Subsidiary Governance, Risk Management