Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Purba, Jeremy Exaudi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Praktik Makelar Kasus Oleh Zarof Ricar Di Pengadilan Andryawan, Andryawan; Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva; Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda; Purba, Jeremy Exaudi
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 11 No 6.D (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the legal context, case brokering can be classified as a corruption offense because it refers to individuals who influence court decisions to win certain cases through unlawful means, such as bribery. In practice, case brokering involves intervening in the law enforcement process, from investigation to court decisions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal provisions regarding the practice of case brokering in court and the legal liability that can be imposed on Zarof Ricar for alleged case brokering practices. In this research we used the normative research method which focuses on the applicable legal rules related to the provisions and legal liability for the practice of case brokering in court. Through this research, it is concluded that Zarof's actions have violated the ASN code of ethics in accordance with applicable legal regulations and because his actions have undermined the principle of judicial independence, Zarof can be sanctioned for his actions. In addition, Zarof may also be subject to sanctions in the form of confiscation of assets obtained from corruption. Thus, to avoid such actions in the future, the Attorney General's Office and the Supreme Court must thoroughly investigate the practice of case brokering by Zarof Ricar and impose strict sanctions on the individuals involved.
Penggunaan Letter Of Credit Dalam Perdagangan Internasional Dan Aspek Hukumnya Purba, Jeremy Exaudi
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research (Special Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.11959

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang Penggunaan Letter of Credit dalam Perdagangan Internasional dan Aspek hukumnya. Terdapat sistem pembayaran internasional yang paling sering dan aman digunakan untuk kegiatan ekspor-impor, yaitu Letter of Credit (L/C), yang merupakan salah satu sistem yang digunakan oleh penjual dan pembeli untuk melakukan transaksi internasional. Penyimpangan dapat menyebabkan kegagalan dalam pembayaran ketika menggunakan sistem L/C ini. Maka dari itu, diperlukannya strategi penanganan yang benar dan sesuai untuk menghindari terjadinya hal yang tidak diinginkan. Dalam transaksi dengan penggunaan L/C, terdapat perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang terlibat dalam penerbitan.
Judicial Inconsistency and Its Implications for Trademark Protection in Indonesia Purba, Jeremy Exaudi; Silalahi, Wilma
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.369

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty and trademark protection for relevant parties arises from the inconsistency between the decisions of the Judex Facti and Judex Juris in trademark cancellation cases. This study aims to identify the nature of this inconsistency and its implications for trademark legal protection in Indonesia. Drawing on statutory regulations, Medan Commercial Court Decision No. 6/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022, and Supreme Court Decision No. 989 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024, this normative legal research employs both case-based and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the Commercial Court adopts a narrow interpretation of “interested parties” and does not recognize first use as a legal basis, resulting in the dismissal of the trademark cancellation claim. In contrast, the Supreme Court applies a broader and more progressive interpretation by acknowledging historical use and identifying indications of bad faith in the trademark registration process. These divergent interpretations generate legal uncertainty, underscoring the need for harmonization between courts to ensure equitable trademark protection.
Co-Authors Andryawan, Andryawan Sanyoto, Alicia Andromeda Silalahi, Wilma Tsabita, Nabilla Mahva