Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya PENA LAW: International Journal of Law
Muzakki, Fauzan
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Budaya Penegakan Hukum Anti-Korupsi: Membangun Kesadaran dan Keterlibatan Masyarakat di Indonesia Shodiq, Mohamad Djafar; Muzakki, Fauzan
Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Ideas: Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya (Mei)
Publisher : Ideas Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32884/ideas.v11i2.2296

Abstract

The problem of anti-corruption legal culture in Indonesia is a very complex issue and has many dimensions. Corruption not only damages the integrity of public institutions, but also reduces public trust in the government. In this case, it is important to realize that corruption is a systemic problem and requires a comprehensive approach to overcome, highlighting how social and cultural norms can support corrupt practices, emphasizing the importance of strategies that consider the local context, the formulation of the problem in this study is how effective the legal culture is in supporting anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and the challenges it faces in controlling community behavior. This research methodology uses normative juridical with a legal enforcement theory framework by Roscoe Pound, a theory that aims to create harmony and harmony in society. The results of the study indicate that the importance of legal awareness: public awareness and discipline towards the law are greatly influenced by the norms that exist in society. Therefore, legal norms must be able to create shared expectations and mutual trust among members of society, cultural approach: developing corruption eradication strategies that are sensitive to local community norms and values, and introducing gradual cultural changes through public awareness campaigns and education
Judicial Exile and International Judicial Reform: Rethinking the Independence of the Judiciary in a Global Context: Judicial Exile and International Judicial Reform: Rethinking the Independence of the Judiciary in a Global Context Muzakki, Fauzan; Suganda, Atma; Akkapin, Supaphorn
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.245

Abstract

Judicial independence is widely recognized as a cornerstone of justice, yet its realization in the international sphere faces increasing challenges from political pressures and global power asymmetries. This study introduces the concept of judicial alienation to capture the growing disconnection between the normative ideals of international courts and their perceived legitimacy. Using a qualitative design with a normative legal and comparative approach, the research examines primary legal instruments, including the Rome Statute, the UN Charter, and selected judgments of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body (WTO DSB), complemented by secondary academic sources. Findings indicate three interrelated patterns: uneven jurisdiction, particularly the ICC’s disproportionate focus on African cases; legitimacy crises, reflected in recurring resistance to ICJ jurisdiction; and the limited scope of reforms, which tend to be procedural rather than structural. Comparative analysis further reveals that while the WTO DSB benefits from broader acceptance through its consensus-based mechanism, the ICC and ICJ remain vulnerable to contestation due to their direct engagement with state sovereignty. The discussion argues that judicial independence should be reconceptualized not only as a normative principle but also as a socio-political practice embedded in global governance. The study contributes theoretically by advancing an interdisciplinary framework and practically by offering reform-oriented recommendations for more inclusive, transparent, and sustainable international judicial institutions.
Co-Authors Akkapin, Supaphorn Shodiq, Mohamad Djafar Suganda, Atma