Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Islamic Thought Review
Muzakki, Fauzan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Budaya Penegakan Hukum Anti-Korupsi: Membangun Kesadaran dan Keterlibatan Masyarakat di Indonesia Shodiq, Mohamad Djafar; Muzakki, Fauzan
Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Ideas: Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya (Mei)
Publisher : Ideas Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32884/ideas.v11i2.2296

Abstract

The problem of anti-corruption legal culture in Indonesia is a very complex issue and has many dimensions. Corruption not only damages the integrity of public institutions, but also reduces public trust in the government. In this case, it is important to realize that corruption is a systemic problem and requires a comprehensive approach to overcome, highlighting how social and cultural norms can support corrupt practices, emphasizing the importance of strategies that consider the local context, the formulation of the problem in this study is how effective the legal culture is in supporting anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and the challenges it faces in controlling community behavior. This research methodology uses normative juridical with a legal enforcement theory framework by Roscoe Pound, a theory that aims to create harmony and harmony in society. The results of the study indicate that the importance of legal awareness: public awareness and discipline towards the law are greatly influenced by the norms that exist in society. Therefore, legal norms must be able to create shared expectations and mutual trust among members of society, cultural approach: developing corruption eradication strategies that are sensitive to local community norms and values, and introducing gradual cultural changes through public awareness campaigns and education
Judicial Exile and International Judicial Reform: Rethinking the Independence of the Judiciary in a Global Context: Judicial Exile and International Judicial Reform: Rethinking the Independence of the Judiciary in a Global Context Muzakki, Fauzan; Suganda, Atma; Akkapin, Supaphorn
PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Yayasan Pusat Cendekiawan Intelektual Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.245

Abstract

Judicial independence is widely recognized as a cornerstone of justice, yet its realization in the international sphere faces increasing challenges from political pressures and global power asymmetries. This study introduces the concept of judicial alienation to capture the growing disconnection between the normative ideals of international courts and their perceived legitimacy. Using a qualitative design with a normative legal and comparative approach, the research examines primary legal instruments, including the Rome Statute, the UN Charter, and selected judgments of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body (WTO DSB), complemented by secondary academic sources. Findings indicate three interrelated patterns: uneven jurisdiction, particularly the ICC’s disproportionate focus on African cases; legitimacy crises, reflected in recurring resistance to ICJ jurisdiction; and the limited scope of reforms, which tend to be procedural rather than structural. Comparative analysis further reveals that while the WTO DSB benefits from broader acceptance through its consensus-based mechanism, the ICC and ICJ remain vulnerable to contestation due to their direct engagement with state sovereignty. The discussion argues that judicial independence should be reconceptualized not only as a normative principle but also as a socio-political practice embedded in global governance. The study contributes theoretically by advancing an interdisciplinary framework and practically by offering reform-oriented recommendations for more inclusive, transparent, and sustainable international judicial institutions.
Judicial Sequestration in Al-Ghazali's Ethical Framework: An Islamic Perspective on Judicial Reform in Indonesia Khoiriyah, Khoiriyah; Muzakki, Fauzan
Islamic Thought Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/itr.v3i1.8851

Abstract

Judicial independence is a foundational principle in ensuring the rule of law and public trust in the judiciary. In Indonesia, this principle faces serious challenges due to recurrent judicial corruption, as revealed by multiple bribery sting operations involving judges. This article examines the concept of judicial sequestration—the isolation of judges from external influences during adjudication—as a potential safeguard for judicial impartiality. Drawing upon Al-Ghazali’s ethical framework, the study argues that effective judicial reform must integrate moral virtues such as piety, independence, and resistance to political and personal pressures. The analysis employs a normative-legal and comparative approach, juxtaposing Al-Ghazali’s judicial ethics with sequestration practices in common law systems. The findings suggest that embedding Islamic ethical values within institutional reform frameworks can enhance judicial integrity and accountability. In particular, a culturally contextualized model of judicial sequestration may serve as a viable mechanism for strengthening judicial independence in Indonesia. This study contributes to ongoing discourse on legal reform by offering a synthesis of classical Islamic thought and modern judicial ethics.
Pertamina's Quasi-Monopoly : How Restrictions on Basic Fuel Imports Impact the Downstream Oil and Gas Investment Maharani, Dewi Nadya; Muzakki, Fauzan; Hartati S, Sawitri Yuli; Setiyono, Setiyono; Efrianto, Gatot
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2726

Abstract

This study discusses the implications of quasi-monopolies that arise due to Pertamina's dominance in the management of the oil and gas sector, especially related to the policy of regulating fuel imports through the Circular Letter of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Number T-19/MG.05/WM. M/2025 dated July 17, 2025. A quasi-monopoly occurs when market dominance is achieved through administrative policies that limit market access for other business actors. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with qualitative-descriptive analysis of laws and regulations, legal literature, and policy documents. The results of the analysis show that the fuel import regulation policy that gives preference to Pertamina can hinder private investor participation, increase the risk of unfair competition, and create legal uncertainty, thereby contributing to declining investment interest. This study recommends policies to ensure fair market access, import transparency, contractual legal certainty, and periodic evaluation of policy impacts. The implementation of these recommendations is expected to minimize quasi-monopolies, encourage a healthy investment climate, and ensure sustainable national energy management
Co-Authors Akkapin, Supaphorn Efrianto, Gatot Hartati S, Sawitri Yuli Khoiriyah Khoiriyah Maharani, Dewi Nadya Setiyono Setiyono Shodiq, Mohamad Djafar Suganda, Atma