p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJLSH
Ahmad Mulia Sembiring
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Visum Et Repertum in Proving Criminal Matters in Indonesia Tuti Gusmawati Simanjuntak; Lili Rahmayana Harahap; Ahmad Mulia Sembiring
International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): IJLSH - November 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Pusat Studi Sosial dan Humaniora [LPS2H]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70193/ijlsh.v1i2.164

Abstract

The use of Visum et Repertum occurs during the evidentiary stage before a criminal trial. Judges carefully evaluate the robustness of the evidence obtained from this examination, thereby strengthening their confidence in reaching a just verdict. By understanding the important role that the Visum et Repertum plays as a form of evidence, judges are equipped to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused in relation to the alleged crime. The research methodology used is normative legal research, characterized by a descriptive analytical approach. This approach involves a thorough examination of literature sources through various viewpoints, including the Legal approach, Conceptual approach, and Case approach. This research carefully involves primary and secondary legal materials to effectively address the formulation of research problems. Based on the results and discussion, it is known that the importance of visum et repertum (VER) is established as written evidence in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This important component plays an important role in the verdict of serious criminal offenses, including maltreatment, rape, and murder. The findings obtained from a visum et repertum conducted by a qualified expert become an invaluable resource for the presiding judge in determining the applicable charges and the appropriate sentence for the accused. Through the insight provided by a post mortem, one can know the extent of the harm suffered by the victim, both physical and psychological, so as to explain the gravity of the offense in question.
Position of Resolving Human Rights Violations through The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Mechanism in Indonesia Nora Liana; Ricky Rosiwa; Ahmad Mulia Sembiring; Dona Popou Saragih; Ade Ira Octa Femi; Malahayati
International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): IJLSH - July 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pusat Studi Sosial dan Humaniora [LPS2H]

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70193/ijlsh.v2i2.193

Abstract

Resolving human rights violations in Indonesia is a complex issue, considering the many cases of violations that occurred during the conflict, especially during the New Order period. One of the mechanisms proposed to resolve the issue of human rights violations is through the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). The TRC functions to reveal the truth about past human rights violations, provide opportunities for victims to obtain justice, and encourage the process of social reconciliation. This abstract aims to examine the position of the TRC in the context of resolving human rights violations in Indonesia, both from a legal perspective, its role in recovering victims, and the challenges faced in its implementation. This research also highlights the difference between settlement through the judiciary and settlement through th , as well as the extent to which the TRC can create restorative justice without ignoring applicable legal principles. Through this analysis, it is hoped that a deeper understanding can be obtained regarding the potential and limitations of the TRC mechanism in realizing resolution of human rights violations in Indonesia.