Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Giffari, Muhammad Naufal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Public Health

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Balik Kapasitas Lateral Fondasi Berdasarkan PDA (Pile Drive Analyzer) Test Giffari, Muhammad Naufal; ., Pratikso; Karlinasari, Rinda
Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol 2, No 2 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Metode yang dipakai pada kajian ini menggunakan aplikasi Allpile, Hasil PDATest dan perhitungan statik yaitu rumus metode Davisson, metode Chin danmetode Davisson untuk daya dukung aksial serta metode Broms untuk daya dukunglateral. Interpretasi bebani untuk mendapatkan besarnya beban ultimitmenggunakan metode Davisson, Chin dan Mazurkiewicz. Pada metode Davissonbeban ultimit sebesar 232 ton, pada metode Chin beban ultimit sebesar 244 ton,pada metode Mazurkiewicz beban ultimit sebesar 232 ton.Kata Kunci: Fondasii Spun pile pile, daya dukungi fondasi
Diskriminasi Sosial dan Marginalisasi Ekonomi sebagai Korelaktor Kejahatan: Studi Etnografi pada Komunitas Urban Poor di Jakarta, Surabaya, dan Medan Taun, Taun; Giffari, Muhammad Naufal
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.4.2.2025.102-114

Abstract

This study examines the complex relationship between social discrimination and economic marginalization as underlying drivers of criminal behavior among urban poor communities in Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. Utilizing a critical ethnographic methodology, the research explores how structural inequalities—rooted in institutional exclusion and persistent stigmatization—shape individual adaptation strategies that often result in involvement with criminal activities. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation over twelve months, and comprehensive analysis of police records and relevant policy documents. Evidence gathered from fieldwork demonstrates that restricted access to formal employment and essential public services perpetuates material deprivation, while cultural stigmatization reinforces negative social stereotypes and marginalizes urban poor further from opportunities for meaningful participation. Anchored in strain theory (Merton, 1938), conflict criminology, and frameworks of social exclusion, this study finds that criminality functions as a rational, adaptive response to survival challenges presented by systemic exclusion. The findings also highlight disparities in the criminal justice process, including over-policing, limited access to legal representation, and disproportionate punitive outcomes for poor individuals. By integrating empirical data and theoretical perspectives, the research argues for a reconceptualization of urban criminality as a social and structural phenomenon rather than individual pathology. Policy implications suggest a need for distributive justice reforms and inclusive social development programs to break the cyclical ties between discrimination, marginalization, and crime within Indonesian urban contexts. This study contributes to the field of criminology by providing grounded, context-specific analysis relevant for future intervention and policymaking.
Redefining Private and Public Space in Contemporary Criminal Law: A Juridical Analysis of the Shift in the Status of Decency Offenses to Complaint Offenses under Law Number 1 of 2023 and Its Implications for Citizens' Right to Privacy Giffari, Muhammad Naufal; Taun, Taun
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 9, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : fakultas hukum universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v9i2.27783

Abstract

This study aims to doctrinally examine the implications of shifting the qualification of morality offenses—specifically adultery and cohabitation—into absolute complaint offenses (absoluut klacht delict) under Law Number 1 of 2023 on the National Penal Code, and to reconstruct its impact on safeguarding citizens' constitutional right to privacy. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the shift in normative status serves as a transformative legal policy instrument designed to deconstruct the threat of over-criminalization and dismantle legal justifications for vigilante acts (eigenrichting). The limitation of legal standing for complaints, granted exclusively to the nuclear family, reflects the state's application of the judicial restraint principle, thereby returning criminal mechanisms to their essence as the ultimum remedium. Furthermore, this regulatory construction successfully formulates an ideal proportionality between the supremacy of universal human rights guarantees and the preservation of the moral order within Indonesia's communal society. This paradigm shift also incorporates the double track system and restorative justice, where the dispute resolution mechanism is directed toward conflict resolution that restores sociological family bonds rather than focusing on retributive imprisonment.
Co-Authors Karlinasari, Rinda Pratikso Pratikso Taun, Taun