Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PESHUM Law and Justice Research Journal
St Laksanto Utomo
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Review of the Attorney General's Authority in Carrying Out Asset Recovery of the Proceeds of Money Laundering Crimes Ade Onny Siagian; ST Laksanto Utomo; Joko Sriwidodo
Law and Justice research journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April: Law and Justice research journal
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/ljrj.v2i2.140

Abstract

Money laundering is a derivative crime that is frequently associated with corruption and has the potential to cause significant losses to state finances. Efforts to recover assets derived from criminal activities constitute an essential aspect of law enforcement aimed at restoring state losses and creating a deterrent effect for perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the authority of public prosecutors in the investigation of money laundering crimes as well as the mechanisms for state asset recovery based on the authority of the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office. The research method employed is normative juridical research using statutory and case approaches. The results of this study indicate that the Attorney General’s Office possesses clear and legally valid authority to conduct investigations into money laundering crimes as regulated under Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering and the Law on the Attorney General’s Office. Prosecutors are authorized to trace, seize, confiscate, and recover assets derived from criminal acts without first proving the predicate offense. This study further emphasizes that although the authority of the Attorney General’s Office has been normatively regulated, in practice, state asset recovery continues to face various obstacles, both in substantive and procedural law, such as inconsistencies in statutory regulations and the suboptimal implementation of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Therefore, strengthening regulations and harmonizing legal policies are necessary to ensure that state asset recovery through the handling of money laundering crimes can be carried out more effectively and provide legal certainty.
Disharmoni Perlindungan Hukum Investor Asing dan Direksi PT PMA dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Budiharjo Hardisurjo; MS Tumanggor; St Laksanto Utomo
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4: Juni 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i4.17498

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji disharmoni perlindungan hukum antara investor asing dan direksi dalam Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing (PT PMA) dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Secara normatif, investor memperoleh jaminan perlindungan melalui prinsip non-diskriminasi, kepastian hukum, dan tanggung jawab terbatas. Namun, dalam praktik, perlindungan tersebut tidak terintegrasi dengan berbagai rezim hukum sektoral seperti ketenagakerjaan, keimigrasian, perpajakan, dan hukum pidana yang justru meningkatkan eksposur risiko bagi direksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk disharmoni tersebut serta merumuskan model perlindungan hukum yang lebih terintegrasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif terbatas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum masih bersifat parsial dan tidak seimbang, di mana investor terlindungi secara normatif, sementara direksi menanggung risiko hukum yang luas dan berlapis. Sebagai solusi, penelitian ini menawarkan model integrasi perlindungan hukum berbasis compliance melalui prinsip legal, prudent, dan accountable yang didukung sistem pengendalian internal, transparansi, dan dokumentasi hukum. Model ini penting untuk menciptakan keseimbangan perlindungan, meningkatkan kepastian hukum, serta menjamin keberlanjutan investasi secara lebih sistemik.
Co-Authors Ade Onny Siagian Budiharjo Hardisurjo Joko Sriwidodo MS Tumanggor