Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis terhadap Kepemilikan Tanah oleh WNA Melalui Pinjam Nama: Studi Perbandingan Hukum Perdata Internasional Dani Lailatul Magviro; Yasid Amali; Lucky Dafira Nugroho
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1552

Abstract

Praktik kepemilikan tanah oleh warga negara asing (WNA) melalui perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement) semakin marak terjadi, khususnya di daerah wisata seperti Bali. Fenomena ini muncul sebagai bentuk penyelundupan hukum untuk menghindari pembatasan kepemilikan tanah yang secara tegas diatur dalam Pasal 21 dan Pasal 26 Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesesuaian praktik perjanjian pinjam nama dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum agraria Indonesia dan mengevaluasi implikasi yuridisnya terhadap para pihak yang terlibat, khususnya notaris. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis-normatif dengan teknik analisis kualitatif terhadap data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian nominee bertentangan dengan norma hukum agraria karena memberikan penguasaan tanah de facto kepada WNA yang secara hukum tidak memenuhi syarat sebagai pemegang hak milik. Selain itu, keterlibatan notaris dalam pembuatan perjanjian tersebut berpotensi melanggar kode etik profesi dan menimbulkan risiko hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penegakan hukum yang lebih tegas dan regulasi tambahan untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan skema nominee, demi menjaga kedaulatan agraria dan kepastian hukum di Indonesia
Legal Protection For Consumers In Unilateral Concert Cancellations (Case Study Of The Ndx Band Concert In Palangkaraya: Bajenta Fest 2024 Event) Dani Lailatul Magviro; R.Anisatul Mukaromah M; Yasid Amali; Kholis
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Progressive and Critical Law Review
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v4i4.188

Abstract

The entertainment industry, particularly music concerts, has become one of the most popular forms of entertainment among the public. However, in practice, unilateral concert cancellations by organizers often occur and potentially harm consumers as ticket buyers. This research aims to analyze the legal protection provided to consumers in cases of unilateral concert cancellations, using the case study of the NDX Band concert at the Bajenta Fest 2024 event, which was abruptly canceled by the organizer without clear accountability. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data analysis is conducted qualitatively by reviewing applicable positive legal norms, such as Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPer), and legal doctrines related to business actors’ liability. The findings indicate that the unilateral cancellation of a concert constitutes a breach of contract, thereby obligating the business actor to provide compensation, restitution, and/or ticket refunds in accordance with Article 4 point (h) and Article 7 point (g) of the Consumer Protection Law. Moreover, the delayed refund process lasting several months without legal certainty demonstrates the weak enforcement of consumer protection in the entertainment sector. Therefore, strengthening regulations and supervisory mechanisms over business actors in the entertainment industry is necessary to ensure the effective protection of consumer rights.