Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan
Santa, Nansi Margret
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Immunology & microbiology Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
A decade of village funds governance: evaluation, optimization, and institutional strengthening for sustainable rural development in Indonesia Waworundeng, Welly; Monintja, Donald; Sampe, Stefanus; Santa, Nansi Margret
Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Vol 15, No 1 (2025): (April 2025)
Publisher : Department of Government Studies Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/ojip.v15i1.17715

Abstract

Village institutions are essential to the Village Fund governance. This study analyzes the factors contributing to the failure of these institutions in managing Village Funds and proposes strategies to enhance their capacity. The research was conducted in Warembungan Village and Kamangta Village in Minahasa Regency using a qualitative descriptive method. The findings indicate that the management of Village Funds is predominantly focused on short-term programs, such as Direct Cash Assistance. Key strategic policies related to this management include the Village Medium-Term Development Plan (VMTDP), Village Government Work Plan (VGWP), and Village Regulations regarding the Village Budget. Internal factors that hinder the efficiency of village institutions include the election of village heads not based on the majority, political interference, low transparency in recruitment processes, limited human resources, and inadequate welfare for officials. External factors include overlapping regulations, weak coordination among agencies, and ineffective supervision. As a result, budget efficiency is compromised, which increases the potential for mismanagement and conflicts of interest. To strengthen village institutions, it is essential to revise overlapping regulations, allow flexibility in the election of village heads, and enhance human resource capacity through competency-based selection. Furthermore, improving transparency in fund management, ensuring strict oversight from the government and community, and involving universities, media, and migrant communities are vital components for ensuring better village governance. With these strategies, village institutions are expected to support optimal and sustainable rural development.
A decade of village funds governance: evaluation, optimization, and institutional strengthening for sustainable rural development in Indonesia Waworundeng, Welly; Monintja, Donald; Sampe, Stefanus; Santa, Nansi Margret
Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): (April 2025)
Publisher : Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/ojip.v15i1.17715

Abstract

Village institutions are essential to the Village Fund governance. This study analyzes the factors contributing to the failure of these institutions in managing Village Funds and proposes strategies to enhance their capacity. The research was conducted in Warembungan Village and Kamangta Village in Minahasa Regency using a qualitative descriptive method. The findings indicate that the management of Village Funds is predominantly focused on short-term programs, such as Direct Cash Assistance. Key strategic policies related to this management include the Village Medium-Term Development Plan (VMTDP), Village Government Work Plan (VGWP), and Village Regulations regarding the Village Budget. Internal factors that hinder the efficiency of village institutions include the election of village heads not based on the majority, political interference, low transparency in recruitment processes, limited human resources, and inadequate welfare for officials. External factors include overlapping regulations, weak coordination among agencies, and ineffective supervision. As a result, budget efficiency is compromised, which increases the potential for mismanagement and conflicts of interest. To strengthen village institutions, it is essential to revise overlapping regulations, allow flexibility in the election of village heads, and enhance human resource capacity through competency-based selection. Furthermore, improving transparency in fund management, ensuring strict oversight from the government and community, and involving universities, media, and migrant communities are vital components for ensuring better village governance. With these strategies, village institutions are expected to support optimal and sustainable rural development.
Risk analysis and production dynamics of smallholder pig farming in rural areas of North Sulawesi Santa, Nansi Margret; Rorimpandey, Boyke; Lainawa, Jolyanis; Wantasen, Erwin; Subagja, Hariadi
Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan (In Progress)
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25047/jipt.v9i1.6363

Abstract

Smallholder pig farming in rural areas of North Sulawesi important role in food security, household economy, and socio-cultural of local communities. However, this sector faces various risks. The aims to analyze production dynamics and identify risk factors that affect the sustainability of smallholder pig farming in rural areas. The research employed a quantitative approach through a survey of 604 farmers (having 3-4 sows/farmer). Data analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results showed that labor, the cage area, quantity of medicines, farm model, and farm location in rural areas significantly influenced pig production. The breeding model resulted in higher production than the combined pig farming model and tended to have lower production risks. Pig production in rural areas is also higher than in suburban areas. Disease risk is the main cause of losses, with production and income declines reaching 182.9% in the breeding model and 303.4% in the combined model. In conclusion, the breeding model resulted in higher production and tends to have lower production risks, particularly disease-related risks that directly affect productivity and farm continuity. These risks significantly reduce household production and income, highlighting the strong relationship between production dynamics, risk levels, and the economic stability of rural pig farmers.
Co-Authors Boyke Rorimpandey Erwin Wantasen Hariadi Subagja Lainawa, Jolyanis Monintja, Donald Stefanus Sampe, Stefanus Waworundeng, Welly