Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter
Yati binti Kamaruddin, Azni
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in the Evaluation Instruments of Civics Education Text Book Saraswati, Destriana; Fiaji, Noveria Anggraeni; Zulvarina, Prima; Yati binti Kamaruddin, Azni
Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): WASKITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter
Publisher : PUSAT MPK UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.waskita.2025.009.01.4

Abstract

The implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in higher education learning materials has become increasingly crucial in preparing students for complex real-world challenges. This study examines the HOTS components in the evaluation instruments of the 2016 Civics Education textbook published by the Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology. The research specifically focuses on analyzing thinking levels based on Bloom's taxonomy, including analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6) capabilities. This descriptive qualitative research employed a systematic literature study method. The data collection involved comprehensive analysis of evaluation instruments from each chapter of the textbook, using predetermined HOTS criteria and indicators. The analysis process included content analysis, categorization, and verification of thinking skill levels. The findings reveal varied distribution of HOTS components in the evaluation instruments: critical thinking (35.6%), creative thinking (11.8%), problem-solving (28.7%), and decision-making (25.3%). Furthermore, the analysis of thinking levels showed the following distribution: C4 (41.4%), C5 (19.5%), and C6 (38%). These results indicate a need for more balanced distribution of HOTS components, particularly in strengthening creative thinking and evaluative abilities in the textbook's evaluation instruments.
Co-Authors Fiaji, Noveria Anggraeni Prima Zulvarina, Prima Saraswati, Destriana