Gunadi, Chaterine Grace
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kajian Normatif terhadap Konstruksi Hukum Kerja Sama Waralaba Menantea dan Implikasinya bagi Franchisee Anneke Catlynne Gunawan; Nasution, Ariaghali Gerard Achmad; Gunadi, Chaterine Grace; Kam, Jaffray Paul; Nugraha, Quinncy Quillon; Shalmont, Jerry
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.5044

Abstract

Karya tulis ini mengkaji permasalahan hukum dalam praktik waralaba yang dilakukan oleh Menantea, sebuah perusahaan minuman yang mulai menawarkan jenis kerjasama berupa waralaba mulai Agustus 2021, hanya 4 (empat) bulan sejak awal berdirinya pada April 2021. Hal ini bertentangan dengan ketentuan Pasal 4 ayat (5) huruf a Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2024 tentang Waralaba, yang mensyaratkan bahwa usaha baru dapat diwaralabakan setelah beroperasi sekurang-kurangnya tiga tahun berturut-turut. Selain itu, Menantea juga belum memenuhi kewajiban administratif berupa kepemilikan Surat Tanda Pendaftaran Waralaba (STPW) sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Waralaba. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pelanggaran yang terjadi, pertanggungjawaban hukum yang seharusnya dikenakan, serta perlindungan hukum bagi mitra waralaba yang dirugikan. Kajian ini disusun dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, melalui analisis terhadap regulasi yang berlaku dan diperkuat dengan referensi dari sumber-sumber hukum yang kredibel. Temuan menunjukkan adanya pelanggaran substantif dan administratif dalam praktik waralaba Menantea, yang berimplikasi pada potensi sanksi administratif hingga pencabutan izin usaha. Kajian ini menegaskan pentingnya kepatuhan terhadap regulasi waralaba dalam rangka menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan bagi mitra usaha.
Breach Of Contract In Focus: Legal Analysis Of Debt Transfer, Property Rights, And Contractual Obligations Gunawan, Anneke Catlynne; Gunadi, Chaterine Grace; Indrakusuma, Jason; Emmanuel Stutanto, Theodore Francisco; Tanaya, Velliana; Nugraha, Dewi
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 3 (2025): Volume 11, Nomor 3 July-September 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i3.11821

Abstract

AbstrakThis article explores the legal framework surrounding breach of contract in Indonesian civil law, with particular focus on debt transfer, property rights, and the enforcement of contractual obligations. By analyzing two recent court decisions—a Supreme Court ruling and a High Court judgment from Surabaya—the study examines how Indonesian judges interpret and apply the principles of contract law in practice. The first case highlights the legal implications of unfulfilled obligations and delayed property settlement, while the second illustrates the procedural and substantive challenges in resolving disputes involving transferred debts and overlapping property claims. The discussion reveals how courts evaluate evidence, assess good faith, and determine liability. The article argues for clearer standards in interpreting contract breaches and a more consistent application of the rules governing debt transfer and secured property rights. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of judicial tendencies and their implications for legal certainty and contract enforcement in Indonesia. Keywords: Breach of contract, ebt transfer, Property rights, Contractual obligations, Indonesian civil law.
Cancellation Of Government Procurement Of Goods/Services In Administrative Legal Aspects And Implication In Ptun Gunawan, Anneke Catlynne; Gunadi, Chaterine Grace; Indrakusuma, Jason; Emmanuel Stutanto, Theodore Francisco
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 3 (2025): Volume 11, Nomor 3 July-September 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i3.11761

Abstract

AbstractProcurement is an activity that involves various parties in an auction or tender process to get the best offer in terms of price, quality, and efficiency. One of the problems that often arise in public procurement tenders is the unilateral cancellation of tenders by authorized officials, which has an impact on losses for bidders. This research aims to analyze the administrative law aspects in the cancellation of government procurement of goods/services and its implications in the State Administrative Court (PTUN). Using a secondary qualitative research method, this research relies on data from journals, articles, and relevant regulations. One of the cases studied is the Jakarta Administrative Court Decision No. 191/G/2019/PTUN-JKT relating to the cancellation of the auction of the DKI Jakarta Electronic Paid Road System (SJBE/ERP) project. The results showed that the cancellation of the auction carried out by the Procurement Committee did not fulfill legal procedures and the aggrieved party could challenge the decision letter to cancel the auction at the PTUN. This study recommends the importance of transparency, accountability, and the application of principles in the public procurement process to avoid injustice to the public. Keywords: Administrative Remedies, Tender, Cancellation, PTUN, Procurement of Goods/Services