Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Teori dan Prosedur Studi Kasus: Rijal al-Hadits Tentang Analisis Kritis Hadits Royhan, Fahmi; Arifin, Tajul; Arifin, Tajul
Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/cakrawala.v1i2.36

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that, in many cases, the assessment of a narrator is not always based on objective evidence, but also involves subjective interpretations by scholars. This raises questions about the standards of objectivity in the science of Rijal al-Hadith and to what extent subjectivity plays a role in evaluating narrators. The aim of this study is to explore and critically analyze the methodology used in Rijal al-Hadith. The research applies a descriptive-analytical approach, with data collected through literature study techniques. The data is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate the presence of subjectivity and complexity, especially related to differences in scholarly views on the credibility of narrators such as Al-Waqidi, which highlights the need for contextual understanding and variation in interpretation. Furthermore, Rijal al-Hadith also faces challenges in the context of modernity and social complexity, requiring an evaluation and updating of methodologies to make them more inclusive. The findings of this research imply the necessity of a holistic approach that considers social, cultural, and intellectual aspects, as well as the use of digital technology and interdisciplinary approaches to enhance the accuracy of narrator assessments.
Analisis Ta'arudh Adillah: Dinamika dan Solusi dalam Ushul Fiqh Sulaiman, Muhammad; Royhan, Fahmi; Sucipto, Imam
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v1i4.81

Abstract

Ta'arudh adillah or conflict between shar'i propositions is one of the fundamental problems in ushul fiqh that requires special attention. The resolution of ta'arudh adillah is crucial to ensure that arguments that appear to be contradictory can be compromised or chosen one of them appropriately, thus maintaining the continuity of understanding Islamic law. This research uses a qualitative approach by analyzing various classical literature by scholars in ushul fiqh. The descriptive-analytical method is applied to explain the concept of ta'arudh adillah, identify the causes of conflict, and evaluate the methods of resolution used by the scholars. The study shows that ta'arudh adillah can be caused by various factors, such as differences in text interpretation, the historical context of the argument, or the level of strength of the argument. The scholars used various methods of resolution, such as tarjih (choosing the stronger argument), nasakh (canceling the previous argument), and jama' (compromising arguments that appear to be contradictory). A deep understanding of the method of resolving ta'arudh adillah can help in applying Islamic law consistently and relevantly. This research makes a significant contribution to the understanding of this concept and its relevance in the modern context.