Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An-nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society
Royhan, Fahmi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Teori dan Prosedur Studi Kasus: Rijal al-Hadits Tentang Analisis Kritis Hadits Royhan, Fahmi; Arifin, Tajul
Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/cakrawala.v1i2.36

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that, in many cases, the assessment of a narrator is not always based on objective evidence, but also involves subjective interpretations by scholars. This raises questions about the standards of objectivity in the science of Rijal al-Hadith and to what extent subjectivity plays a role in evaluating narrators. The aim of this study is to explore and critically analyze the methodology used in Rijal al-Hadith. The research applies a descriptive-analytical approach, with data collected through literature study techniques. The data is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate the presence of subjectivity and complexity, especially related to differences in scholarly views on the credibility of narrators such as Al-Waqidi, which highlights the need for contextual understanding and variation in interpretation. Furthermore, Rijal al-Hadith also faces challenges in the context of modernity and social complexity, requiring an evaluation and updating of methodologies to make them more inclusive. The findings of this research imply the necessity of a holistic approach that considers social, cultural, and intellectual aspects, as well as the use of digital technology and interdisciplinary approaches to enhance the accuracy of narrator assessments.
Analisis Ta'arudh Adillah: Dinamika dan Solusi dalam Ushul Fiqh Sulaiman, Muhammad; Royhan, Fahmi; Sucipto, Imam
An-Nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/an-nisa.v1i4.81

Abstract

Ta'arudh adillah or conflict between shar'i propositions is one of the fundamental problems in ushul fiqh that requires special attention. The resolution of ta'arudh adillah is crucial to ensure that arguments that appear to be contradictory can be compromised or chosen one of them appropriately, thus maintaining the continuity of understanding Islamic law. This research uses a qualitative approach by analyzing various classical literature by scholars in ushul fiqh. The descriptive-analytical method is applied to explain the concept of ta'arudh adillah, identify the causes of conflict, and evaluate the methods of resolution used by the scholars. The study shows that ta'arudh adillah can be caused by various factors, such as differences in text interpretation, the historical context of the argument, or the level of strength of the argument. The scholars used various methods of resolution, such as tarjih (choosing the stronger argument), nasakh (canceling the previous argument), and jama' (compromising arguments that appear to be contradictory). A deep understanding of the method of resolving ta'arudh adillah can help in applying Islamic law consistently and relevantly. This research makes a significant contribution to the understanding of this concept and its relevance in the modern context.
The Role of Muhammad Mustafa Al-A'zami in Responding to the Orientalist View of the Authenticity of Hadith Royhan, Fahmi; Arifin, Tajul; Abdurrahman, Irwan; Kanaan, Asim Ismail; Al-Kasyaf, Muhammad Zheeva
Cakrawala: Journal of Religious Studies and Global Society Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/cakrawala.v2i2.353

Abstract

This study explores the contribution of Muhammad Mustafa Azami in responding to Orientalist critiques of the authenticity of hadith as a primary source of Islamic teachings. In contemporary Islamic studies, hadith has often been the target of criticism, particularly by Western Orientalists such as Joseph Schacht, who argued that hadith was a fabrication by later Muslim scholars rather than originating from the Prophet Muhammad himself. Such views have undermined the authority of hadith and shifted its central role in Islamic epistemology. Azami, a renowned hadith scholar and academic, systematically refuted these claims through his seminal works, including Studies in Early Hadith Literature and On Schacht’s Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. He challenged the Orientalist methodology and demonstrated that both the isnad (chain of transmission) and matn (content) of hadith were preserved and codified with rigorous scholarly discipline since the earliest generations of Islam. This research employs a qualitative approach using literature review methods to analyze Azami’s arguments. The findings reveal that Azami not only reaffirmed the authenticity of hadith but also strengthened its standing in global academic discourse. His contributions significantly defend the integrity of Islamic scholarly tradition and foster a more balanced dialogue between classical Islamic and contemporary Western approaches.
Co-Authors Abdurrahman, Irwan Al-Kasyaf, Muhammad Zheeva Kanaan, Asim Ismail Muhammad Sulaiman Sucipto, Imam Tajul Arifin