Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesenjangan Regulasi dan Implementasi Perlindungan Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Pesantren Indonesia Firmanda, Ridho Junilham; Tan, Winsherly; Alhakim, Abdurrakhman
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Volume 5 Nomor 4 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v5i4.3381

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis kesenjangan antara regulasi dan implementasi hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap korban kekerasan seksual di lingkungan pondok pesantren. Fenomena kekerasan seksual di pesantren menunjukkan adanya ketidaksesuaian antara norma hukum yang berlaku dengan praktik di lapangan. Meskipun telah tersedia sejumlah regulasi seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual dan Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 73 Tahun 2022, pelaksanaannya masih menghadapi banyak kendala. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan teori legal positivism sebagai dasar analisis. Temuan utama menunjukkan lemahnya pengawasan eksternal, tidak adanya mekanisme pengaduan yang aman, dominasi struktur hierarkis, serta rendahnya literasi hukum sebagai faktor penghambat perlindungan korban. Penelitian ini menawarkan rekomendasi berupa penguatan Standar Operasional Prosedur berbasis korban, pembentukan pengawasan independen, dan pelatihan bagi aparat hukum dan pengelola pesantren. Implikasi dari hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat mendorong reformasi kebijakan dan penguatan sistem hukum dalam lembaga pendidikan keagamaan.
Restorative Justice in Handling Corporate Crimes in Decision 187/Pid.Sus-LH/2024/PN Son Situmorang, Otniel Raja Maruli; Firmanda, Ridho Junilham; Purba, Williem Aditya Sion
Conference on Business, Social Sciences and Technology (CoNeScINTech) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Conference on Business, Social Sciences and Technology (CoNeScINTech)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/conescintech.v5i1.10589

Abstract

The use of restorative justice in addressing corporate crimes, particularly in Decision Number 187/Pid. Sus-LH/2024/PN Son concerning breaches of environmental regulations by companies. In this situation, restorative justice, typically used in personal instances, can be effectively implemented by corporations that commit criminal acts. This approach explores how it influences environmental restoration and safeguards the communities that are affected. This research seeks to assess the appropriateness of utilizing the principle of restorative justice in cases of corporate crime, especially in this specific instance, and to investigate its effectiveness and legal consequences in attaining meaningful justice and promoting environmental sustainability. The research method used is normative legal research, with a statutory regulatory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. This approach involves a thorough examination of court decisions, applicable laws and regulations, as well as legal theory and related literature. The findings of the research indicate that in Decision 187/Pid. Sus-LH/2024/PN Son, the implementation of restorative justice involves the requirement to rehabilitate the environment and provide compensation to impacted communities, rather than relying solely on traditional penalties like fines or incarceration for companies. This choice signifies the advancement of environmental criminal law, as it focuses on addressing actual damages instead of merely serving symbolic penalties. Restorative justice concerning environmental violations by corporations emphasizes the need to restore harmed ecological conditions rather than solely concentrating on punishment. This method promotes corporate accountability to address environmental damage and offer restitution to impacted communities. Therefore, restorative justice may serve as an alternative approach for resolving corporate criminal cases, emphasizing restoration and sustainability, accompanied by more explicit regulations and rigorous monitoring systems.