Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legalis : Journal of Law Review Novatio : Journal of Management Technology and Innovation
Zakaria, Ricky Muhamad
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Integrating Governance, Technical Controls, and Agile Practices: A Multi Layered Risk Management Framework for High Technology Projects Hermansyah, Heri; Zakaria, Ricky Muhamad
Novatio : Journal of Management Technology and Innovation Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): July 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/novatio.v2i3.851

Abstract

High technology project environments present a complex landscape of interdependent risks spanning governance, technical, and operational domains. This study examines the integration of governance structures, domain specific technical controls, and agile risk management practices to address these multifaceted challenges. The research highlights the strategic synergy between frameworks such as ISO 31000, ISO/IEC 27005, NIST SP 800 53, and the NIST AI RMF, combined with agile techniques like SAFe ROAM, to create a comprehensive, layered risk management architecture. This approach enables precise risk identification, robust mitigation planning, and responsive adaptation to rapidly evolving technological and market conditions. The methodology involved analyzing best practices in cross framework integration, risk mapping, and agile tracking methods, supported by case studies and empirical literature. Key findings show that multi-layered frameworks improve adaptability, strengthen decision making, and enhance transparency. They also create a shared risk language across technical, managerial, and executive levels, which improves communication and coordination. Results reveal that challenges persist, including coordination complexity, cultural resistance, and potential duplication when frameworks are not harmonized. Addressing these issues requires deliberate integration planning, stakeholder engagement, and change management strategies. In addition, adopting AI and automation improves real-time risk detection, dynamic control mapping, and continuous monitoring. These capabilities help organizations maintain compliance and resilience in rapidly changing regulatory environments. In conclusion, multi layered risk management frameworks represent a strategic imperative for organizations operating in high tech sectors. By combining governance oversight, technical precision, and agile adaptability, these frameworks deliver resilience, foresight, and agility essential for sustainable growth and long term competitive advantage.
Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in the Digital Marketplace: Rethinking Jurisdiction and Law in Global E-Commerce Governance Taufiqurokhman; Sara, Rineke; Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro; Zakaria, Ricky Muhamad
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i4.1122

Abstract

Cross-border e-commerce has created unprecedented opportunities for global trade but also introduced complex legal challenges regarding jurisdiction and applicable law in consumer disputes. This article explores how legal systems particularly those of the European Union (EU), the United States (US), ASEAN, and Indonesia govern jurisdiction and applicable law in business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce transactions. Using a doctrinal and comparative legal method, the study analyzes key instruments such as the Brussels I Recast, Rome I and II Regulations, Hague Conventions of 2005 and 2019, and relevant national laws. Case law from the CJEU and US courts is used to illustrate doctrinal interpretations, with attention to the targeting test, forum-selection enforceability, and protection of consumer rights. Procedural tools such as the Hague Service and Evidence Conventions are also examined. Findings reveal that while the EU offers a harmonized, consumer-focused regime, enforcement across borders remains inconsistent. The Hague 2019 Convention presents a pathway toward enforceability but requires broader ratification. The US system emphasizes contractual freedom, often limiting consumer protections. Regional efforts, particularly in ASEAN and Indonesia, demonstrate varied progress in legal harmonization. Jurisdictional ambiguity, enforcement gaps, and fragmented legal standards continue to affect legal certainty in cross-border e-commerce. The article concludes that harmonized jurisdictional and applicable law standards, coupled with technological and institutional innovation, are necessary to ensure consumer protection and support legal predictability in global digital markets.
Co-Authors Heri Hermansyah Sara, Rineke Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro Taufiqurokhman