Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language, and Education OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching Educatio Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan JAS-PT Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Voices of English Language Education Society Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Scientia: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching Journal of English Development
Yamin, Moh
English Education Department, Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Jl. Brigjen H. Hasan Basry Kayu Tangi Banjarmasin 219, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ketepatan Penyaluran BOS Tingkat SDN DI Kabupaten Banjar Moh Yamin
Educatio Vol 13, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/edc.v12i1.840

Abstract

This study aims to describe the factors that influences the accuracy of school operational fund towards the implementation of elementary education in Banjar regency. This research is descriptive and qualitative in which the questionnaire is the data collecting tool to find out the availability of acceptance, distribution mechanism, and realization of school operational fund program using prepared technical guidance. The samples are principals, teachers, school committees, and learners' parents in each district by purposive sampling technique. The results show that the acceptance and realization of school operational program in Banjar regency is in accordance with school operational fund technical guidance with some important notes where there are still school committees being lack of understanding of school operational fund technical guidelines; there are some management teams who are still having difficulty to manage the school operational fund program due to lack of understanding of technical guidances of operational school fund that often change and less master ICT, school operational fund amount insufficient for school operational requirement and for paying teacher honorarium; and there are still school components who feel receiving the donations of committees or parents' learners.
Designing The English Argumentative Essay Writing Test Based on Critical Thinking Skills Moh. Yamin; Slamet Setiawan; Syafi'ul Anam
VELES Voices of English Language Education Society Vol 7 No 1 (2023): VELES VOICES OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION SOCIETY
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/veles.v7i1.11671

Abstract

Designing the argumentative essay test instrument based on critical thinking skills is the step to produce the writing test instrument used for measuring the students’ performance in writing the argumentative essay with critical thinking skills. This study aimed at measuring the validity and reliability of the argumentative essay writing instrument test with critical thinking skills. The procedure to create the writing test instrument credible was conducted by testing the instrument valid and reliable. The process of validating is through content validity and expert validation. The process of making the instrument reliable was done by checking the score of the students tested in trying out. The result of validating and making the instrument reliable was stated effective for use to get the data collection. Either pretest or posttest of the instrument in each component is stated reliable and it affirms the reliability of the instrument. The notes from the validator of the instrument are in line with the statistics stating that the instrument can be used for collecting the data. As a result, the writing test instrument was ready to use for the research. It is suggested that this instrument can be used for other relevant issues and studied more deeply for the next relevant studies.
Assessing Strategies of Performing Critical Thinking in an Argumentative Essay Moh. Yamin; Vivi Aulia
INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 10 No 2 (2023): INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah (UNIMUDA) Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v10i2.4860

Abstract

This study aims to assess strategies of performing critical thinking in an argumentative essay to a number of selected scientific articles. The method used is descriptive with a qualitative approach with systematic literature review. Manual coding is used to map and get the relevant data to tabulate; content analysis is used to analyze the data. The result study says that critical thinking used in writing argumentative essay is effected by the experience of writing, background of knowledge of the author, and the awareness to respond to the issue. Consequently, the sharpness of the argumentative essay with critical thinking for each author is different.
A Narrative Inquiry between Input and Output Ability: CTS Connection in Debate for EFL: English Yahya Al Abrar; Moh. Yamin; Elsa Rosalina
Journal of English Development Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): Journal of English Development
Publisher : Prodi Tadris Bahasa Inggris

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jed.v4i02.4633

Abstract

This study delves into the correlation between critical thinking and input ability skills within the framework of debate. While debate often highlights spontaneous and responsive skills, the overlooked essential is the input ability, encompassing tasks like confirming information, summarizing, and catching details. These skills precede output ability and are crucial in effective debating. Drawing from sources spanning the past decade, this qualitative research employs the narrative inquiry method to explore the role of critical thinking in language input ability. Data collection involves questionnaires targeting students with debate experience, focusing on the impact of input and output skills on their debating. Utilizing interviews, the research reveals that a balance between input and output abilities is vital for successful debate performance. The result is participants have different points of view in choosing whether input or output which affects their critical thinking mostly, the strategies they used, the importance of output and input abilities, and emotional intelligence, it shows the need for strategies to enhance input abilities alongside output skills to gain maximum potential in debate. Future research aims to develop methods for fostering balanced improvement in input abilities, shifting from a sole focus on output proficiency.
Co-Authors Ajah Saputra Ali Mustofa Elsa Rosalina Fabiola Dharmawanti Kurnia Mariatul Kiptiah Nurhamsi Deswila Oikurema Purwati SLAMET SETIAWAN Syafi'ul Anam Syafi’ul Anam Vivi Aulia Wahyu wahyu Yahya Al Abrar