Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN SERTIFIKAT HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI JAMINAN KREDIT (STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN SINGAPURA) Afriliani Putri , Rizka; Ruhtiani, Maya; Hafny Afrilies, Marlia
J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): JLEE VOL 7 NO 1
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/j-lee.v7i1.1886

Abstract

This research is entitled “The Legal Status of Copyright Certificate as Loan Collateral (A Comparative Study between Indonesia and Singapore)”, aiming to analyze and compare the legal regulation and protection of copyright certificates as loan collateral in Indonesia and Singapore. This study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that both Indonesia and Singapore recognize copyright as a viable collateral object. However, Singapore has established a more structured system through the Copyright Act 2021, the IP Financing Scheme, and the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS), which facilitates the monetization of copyright with standardized valuation methods. In contrast, Indonesia, despite having a legal basis through the Copyright Law, Fiduciary Law, and Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022, still faces practical barriers such as the absence of a dedicated financing scheme, lack of standardized valuation, and minimal involvement from financial institutions. Therefore, legal and policy reforms are needed in Indonesia to strengthen copyright as an economic asset that can be effectively used as loan collateral.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 115/PDT.SUS- MEREK/2022/PN.NIAGA. JKT.PST TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK DAGANG KASO DAN KASOMAX Abrillia, Marcella; Ruhtiani, Maya; Hafny Afrilies, Marlia
J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): JLEE VOL 7 NO 1
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/j-lee.v7i1.1887

Abstract

This study examines the trademark dispute between PT Tatalogam Lestari (owner of the "KASO" mark) and Tedi Hartono (registrant of the "kasomax" mark), adjudicated by the Commercial Court of Central Jakarta (Decision No. 115/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022). The dispute arose from alleged violations of the first-to-file principle, distinctiveness, and bad faith in trademark registration. Indonesia adopts a first-to-file system under Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, granting exclusive rights to the first registrant. This case demonstrates that registering marks similar to existing trademarks may cause consumer confusion and unfair competition.The study aims to analyze the court’s legal considerations in the ruling and the application of trademark principles in dispute resolution. A normative juridical approach was employed, utilizing primary legal sources (statutes, court decisions) and secondary materials (literature, journals).Findings indicate the Commercial Court annulled the registration of "kasomax" due to its fundamental similarity to the "KASO" mark and bad-faith registration. The ruling reinforces the first-to-file principle and provides legal certainty for registered trademark owners. The implications suggest the need for stronger substantive examination by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) and public awareness campaigns to prevent infringing registrations.
PENINGKATAN REGULASI DAN KEBIJAKAN DI INDONESIA UNTUK MENDUKUNG TEKNOLOGI BLOCKCHAIN DALAM PROSES KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER DAN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING TERKAIT IMPLEMENTASI PENCEGAHAN PENCUCIAN UANG Simanjuntak, Efendi; Hafny Afrilies, Marlia; Angel Lina, Angie
J-LEE - Journal of Law, English, and Economics Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): JUNI
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/j-lee.v6i1.1576

Abstract

The digital era has introduced new complexities to the global financial system, where advancements in information technology expand opportunities for criminals to engage in money laundering with increasingly sophisticated and harder-to-trace methods. Money laundering, which harms economic development through various negative impacts such as disruptions to financial stability, reduced state revenue, and damage to national reputation, requires effective preventive measures. This article is the result of research using a juridical-normative method. The findings indicate that the banking system is often used to conceal illegal funds due to its complexity and international nature, facilitating criminals to transfer and convert funds securely and legally. Therefore, blockchain provides a tamper-proof transaction record and allows open access to verify ownership and transactions. This can strengthen anti-money laundering compliance by reducing potential bias, enhancing protection against cyber threats, and ensuring transaction integrity. The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial system can bring paradigm shifts, assisting financial institutions and regulatory bodies in addressing money laundering challenges more effectively and transparently. With its characteristics of transparency and security, blockchain technology offers innovative solutions in Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) processes. Although Bank Indonesia has issued anti-money laundering policies, regulatory and compliance challenges remain in Indonesia. This study uses a normative approach with secondary data from various legal sources to assess the effectiveness of blockchain technology implementation in preventing money laundering.