Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum J-CEKI
Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Efforts to Realize Inclusive Justice through Restorative Justice in the Natuna Islands Community Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar; Sulaiman , Abdullah
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 4 No. 7 (2025): INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v4i7.1453

Abstract

Just law enforcement in an archipelago such as Natuna faces various challenges, especially related to limited access to the formal justice system. This study aims to analyze efforts to realize inclusive justice through a restorative justice approach in the Natuna Islands community. Using a normative juridical method, this study examines relevant laws and legal literature that support the application of restorative justice as an alternative dispute resolution. The results indicate that the restorative justice approach can be an effective solution to create more equitable and humanistic justice, emphasizing restoring social relations between perpetrators, victims, and the community. Amidst the limited formal legal infrastructure in the archipelago, this model can provide access to justice that is more easily accessible and follows local values. The application of restorative justice in Natuna can also strengthen community participation in the conflict resolution process while enriching customary law practices that have long been part of the community's social life. This study recommends formal integration between the national legal system and the restorative justice approach, especially in the context of 3T (frontier, outermost, and disadvantaged) areas, to realize inclusive and sustainable justice.
Kakarkeristik Tata Cara Bersidang dalam Sistem Civil Law di Badan Peradilan Negara Indonesia Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 6: Oktober 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i6.12525

Abstract

Sistem peradilan di Indonesia mencerminkan kompleksitas dan keunikan yang terbentuk dari perpaduan sejarah hukum kolonial, dinamika sosial, serta tuntutan keadilan modern. Kajian ini menarik untuk dilakukan karena menyoroti dinamika dan relevansi penerapan prinsip-prinsip Common Law dalam sistem hukum Civil Law yang secara formal dianut Indonesia dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Melalui pendekatan tersebut, artikel ini menelaah bagaimana fleksibilitas yudisial, preseden hukum, serta penalaran berbasis kasus dari tradisi Common Law dapat memberikan kontribusi terhadap penyelesaian sengketa yang berakar pada hukum adat dan budaya lokal di Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan adanya kebutuhan mendesak bagi para penegak hukum—termasuk hakim, jaksa, dan advokat—untuk mengembangkan kapasitas interpretatif yang mampu mengakomodasi nilai-nilai lokal tanpa mengurangi prinsip kepastian hukum. Rekomendasi kebijakan yang diusulkan meliputi penguatan pendidikan yudisial, pengakuan terbatas terhadap yurisprudensi sebagai sumber hukum pelengkap, serta pengembangan mekanisme integratif yang secara kontekstual mengakomodasi keberlakuan hukum adat dalam sistem peradilan nasional.
Interpretasi Teori Jimenez dalam Praktik Hukum Kontrak di Indonesia Bagus, Sujoko; Ryandra, Reza; Darmawan, Andri; Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar; Santiago, Faisal
JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Vol 4 No 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana
Publisher : POKJANAS Bekerja Sama Biro Perencanaan dan Penganggaran, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Agama RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61860/jigp.v4i3.343

Abstract

Contract law practice in Indonesia tends to resolve disputes through economic compensation, overlooking the moral and social dimensions inherent in contractual relationships. This gap exists between the current formalistic civil law approach and the need for substantive justice, raising questions about the adequacy of the existing legal framework to fully remedy damages. This research examines the urgency of applying a more holistic contract remedy theory. This study employs qualitative method with a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches. The analysis focuses on primary legal materials, such as the Indonesian Civil Code and court decisions, and secondary materials, including journals and books, with a focus on Felipe Jiménez’s pluralistic theory to evaluate its relevance in the Indonesian legal context. The findings indicate a significant discrepancy between theory and practice, with the judiciary prioritizing financial compensation. Jiménez's theory, which balances economic, moral, and social values, offers a more comprehensive framework, with the principle of good faith in the Civil Code as its juridical basis. It is concluded that applying this theory can enrich contract law practice by integrating restorative justice. It is recommended that legal academics and practitioners delve deeper into the literature on contract remedy theory, and that legal education be reformed alongside a review of relevant Civil Code provisions.
Legal Implications of Restorative Justice in Narcotics Crimes: Integrating Accountability and Rehabilitation Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar; Herman, KMS
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.433

Abstract

Drug crimes are a form of crime that has a systemic impact on public health, security, and order. The conventional criminal justice system, which tends to emphasize imprisonment, has not been fully effective in addressing the root causes of drug abuse, especially for users. In light of this, the restorative justice concept has surfaced as a substitute that seeks to rebuild the community, victims, and offenders via communication and rehabilitation. This study examines the legal implications of implementing restorative justice for drug crimes to realize restorative justice and rehabilitation for perpetrators. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2010, Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code are examined using a normative method. The study's findings suggest that restorative justice is only appropriate for drug users who fulfill specific requirements, such as not being recidivists and having a limited amount of evidence. The implementation of this approach has had a positive impact on reducing overcrowding in correctional institutions and fulfilling offenders' human rights to rehabilitation. However, obstacles remain, such as limited explicit regulations in the Narcotics Law and a lack of adequate rehabilitation facilities. Policy reform and strengthening synergy between law enforcement agencies are crucial steps in expanding the comprehensive implementation of restorative justice in the future.
Co-Authors Bagus, Sujoko Darmawan, Andri Faisal Santiago, Faisal Herman, KMS Ryandra, Reza Sulaiman , Abdullah Zainal Arifin Hoesein