Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.399
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara
Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
URGENSI PENGATURAN REKAM MEDIS ELEKTRONIK BAGI PASIEN ASING DI INDONESIA: UPAYA MENGISI KEKOSONGAN NORMA DALAM ERA WISATA MEDIS Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih; Komang Febrinayanti Dantes; Putu Riski Ananda Kusuma; Ni Putu Ega Parwati
Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Agustus, Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jatayu.v8i2.102101

Abstract

Pengelolaan Rekam Medis Elektronik (RME) telah menjadi elemen penting dalam pelayanan kesehatan modern, khususnya dalam konteks wisata medis yang melibatkan pasien asing. Indonesia sebagai negara tujuan wisata medis belum memiliki regulasi spesifik yang mengatur perlindungan hukum terhadap data medis pasien asing dalam sistem RME. Kekosongan norma ini menimbulkan berbagai implikasi hukum, seperti ketidakpastian perlindungan data pribadi, lemahnya posisi hukum dalam sengketa lintas negara, serta terhambatnya kerjasama internasional di sektor kesehatan. Meskipun terdapat peraturan umum terkait RME dan perlindungan data, namun belum ada pengaturan yang mengakomodasi kebutuhan hukum lintas yurisdiksi. Kondisi ini berpotensi menghambat pertumbuhan wisata medis dan menurunkan daya saing Indonesia secara global. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan regulasi yang komprehensif, harmonis, dan responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi dan tuntutan internasional.
Sengketa Merek Dagang Geprek Bensu dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komang Cahyaniarsa Suryaningrat; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Mei: CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/cendekia.v6i2.8927

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPR) are an important legal tool for trademark ownership, protecting business quality, and protecting a company's economic interests. Consumers build trust in trademarks because they signal distinct product quality and reflect a positive and consistent corporate image. Trademark protection is regulated by national law under Trademark Law No. 20 of 2016, which provides legal certainty for trademark owners. This law stipulates that a trademark is only valid if it has distinctive elements, is not imitative, and has been officially registered with an authorized institution. The "first come, first served" principle in Indonesian trademark law can be interpreted as a mechanism that grants rights to the first party to file a valid application. However, the application of this principle in practice often raises complex legal issues, particularly when a trademark has already gained widespread public recognition prior to its formal registration. This study focuses on evaluating this legal protection through a normative legal research method by examining applicable laws, regulations, and court decisions related to trademark disputes in Indonesia. The Geprek Bensu dispute has attracted public attention because it highlights the conflict between legal provisions regarding trademark ownership and public perception. This case demonstrates that the existing legal framework still requires further refinement to balance the interests of trademark registrants with those of parties who have built public reputation through prior commercial use. Therefore, legal reform and consistent law enforcement are essential to ensure fair and comprehensive trademark protection in Indonesia.
Analisis Pelanggaran Hak Ekonomi Lagu Akad Karya Payung Teduh dalam Penggunaan Kepentingan Komersial Gina Sonia Kafiar; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Mei: CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/cendekia.v6i2.8928

Abstract

Copyright is a key pillar of the Intellectual Property Rights system, providing legal protection for creative works in the arts sector, particularly musical works. Within the copyright framework, the most crucial aspect is economic rights, namely the exclusive right of creators to derive financial benefit from any use of their works. However, the reality on the ground demonstrates the rampant use of songs for commercial purposes without proper authorization, which directly harms creators. This article analyzes economic rights violations in the context of commercial use, using the case study of the song "Akad" by Payung Teduh as a case study. This research uses normative legal methods through a statutory and legal conceptual approach. The research findings indicate that the exploitation of songs for material gain without the explicit consent of the rights holder constitutes a clear violation of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Such violations carry serious legal consequences, including civil liability in the form of compensation payments and criminal sanctions. Therefore, synergy between firm law enforcement and increased collective public awareness is necessary. These efforts are vital to guaranteeing the protection of creators' economic rights while creating a healthy, fair, and sustainable creative industry ecosystem in Indonesia for all arts stakeholders.
Sengketa Resep Ayam Goreng sebagai Rahasia Dagang dalam Usaha Kuliner di Indonesia Catharina Jean Sinaga; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Mei: CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/cendekia.v6i2.8929

Abstract

Trade secrets are a type of Intellectual Property Right that plays a crucial role in providing legal protection for business information with economic value and kept confidential by its owner. In the food industry, recipes not only serve as production guidelines but also serve as a business's identity and competitive advantage. Legal issues can arise if the recipe is used or owned by others without permission, especially when conflicts arise within the business or during competition. This situation can trigger trade secret disputes that can be detrimental to business owners, both financially and sustainably. This article discusses the position of fried chicken recipes as trade secrets in culinary business practices in Indonesia and the forms of legal protection available to rights holders. The discussion was conducted based on the provisions of Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets, using a normative approach. The analysis shows that a fried chicken recipe falls into the trade secret category if it meets the requirements of being unknown to the public, having economic value, and being strictly maintained by the business owner. Therefore, legal protection for trade secrets is crucial to prevent unfair business competition and provide legal certainty and protection for culinary businesses in Indonesia  
Tinjauan Yuridis Akibat Hukum dalam Perbuatan Wanprestasi Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Uang : Studi Putusan PN Denpasar NO. 1302/PDT.G/2024/PN DPS Ni Luh Yossi Shuartini Millenia; Komang Febrinayanti Dantes; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i2.2531

Abstract

The term "breach of contract" in contract law refers to a breach of promise. Discussions of breach of contract, both in doctrine and jurisprudence, are usually associated with a statement of negligence by the debtor, where the debtor has failed to properly fulfill their contractual obligations, and the debtor is at fault. It must be acknowledged that a breach of contract, or breach of promise, already involves bad faith on the part of the party failing to fulfill their promise. The meaning of "breach of contract" in banking law relates to the occurrence of problem loans at banks, which cause the loan to become non-performing. This is usually due to the debtor or customer not paying by the previously agreed payment date. The existence of a breach of contract is inseparable from the existence of a credit agreement. Whether a debtor is in default cannot be determined simply because there are efforts to rescue loans that have entered a problematic stage. The beginning of a violation of an agreement or default due to someone not being paid, in meeting the credit rescue standards at the bank, usually efforts are made such as Rescheduling, Reconditioning, Restructuring, through this rescue, the debtor is given the opportunity to lose his business, so the concept of default in BW and the Banking Law must be measured through the performance given, in both regulations, then from there the concept of problem credit can be classified. This banking regulation can be said to be a default, the comparison of this concept is the discussion in this thesis.
Analisis Yuridis Hak Krama Desa Adat Atas Tanah Pekarangan Desa (PKD) Sebagai Tempat Tinggal dan Bisnis Komersil Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah No 4 Tahun 2019 Ni Luh Eka Puspita; I Kadek Dony Hartawan; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis Vol 5 No 4 (2025): english
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to legally analyze the rights of Adat Village Krama (customary villagers) over Village Residential Land) converted into commercial residences under Bali Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2019 concerning Adat Villages in Bali. This study focuses on two aspects: the legal status and limitations of Krama rights over PKD land according to Regulation Number 4 of 2019, and the validity as well as the legal implications of utilizing such communal land for commercial residences. This study is a normative legal research employing a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study show that there is a vague norm in Article 62 paragraph (2) letter b of Regulation Number 4 of 2019, specifically within the phrase "economy for its owner," which fails to provide material limitations on the scale of individual commercial businesses and obscures customary law principles. Legally, such utilization is deemed valid provided that there is no transfer of physical ownership to outsiders and it is governed through local customary law instruments. The legal implication of this vague norm triggers regulatory ambiguity at the operational level due to the absence of standardized guidelines. Therefore, it is recommended to formulate explicit implementing regulations within each Adat Village to control commercial utilization and establish financial contribution mechanisms for the village treasury without restricting the economic rights of the Krama
KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PASAL 32 AYAT (2) PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 1997: ANTARA KEABSAHAN ADMINISTRATIF DAN KEABSAHAN MATERIIL Ni Kadek Febri Dewi Tirani; I Kadek Dony Hartawan; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis Vol 6 No 3 (2026): Juli, Jurnal Hukum Sui Generis
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land registration is intended to ensure legal certainty through the issuance of land title certificates, which serve as legally recognized evidence of land rights. Article 32(2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 provides legal protection to landowners and certificate holders who acquire land rights in good faith and exercise actual physical possession of the land, provided that the certificate has been lawfully issued. However, the regulation does not specify the legal parameters of the phrase "lawfully issued," giving rise to normative ambiguity. This study examines the legal standards governing the validity of land title certificates under Article 32(2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and evaluates their implications for legal certainty. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings demonstrate that the phrase "lawfully issued" may be interpreted as referring to either administrative validity or substantive validity, resulting in divergent interpretations in judicial practice. Accordingly, administrative and substantive validity should be construed as complementary and cumulative requirements in order to strengthen legal certainty and ensure effective protection of land rights.
HARMONISASI PENGATURAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA BERBASIS RISIKO (OSS-RBA) DENGAN KETENTUAN RTRW PROVINSI BALI DALAM PERLINDUNGAN KAWASAN LINDUNG Ni Komang Merlinda Putri; I Kadek Dony Hartawan; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis Vol 6 No 3 (2026): Juli, Jurnal Hukum Sui Generis
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The reform of Indonesia’s business licensing system through Risk-Based Business Licensing as regulated under Goverment Regulation No. 5 of 2021 aims to establish a conducive investment climate by simplifying licensing procedures based on the level of risk associated with the business activity. Nevertheless, the implementation of business licensing must remain consistent with spatial planning as stipulated under the regulations in Goverment Regulation No. 21 of 2021 concerning Spatial Planning Administration and the Bali Provincial Regulatian Number 2 of 2023 concerning the Bali Provincial Spatial Plam (RTRW) for 2023-2043, particularly regarding the protection of conservation areas. This research is motivated by the potential disharmony between the regulation Risk-Based Business Licensing and spatial palnning provisions, particularly in connection with the issuance of busniness licenses within areas adjacent to protected areas. This issue is reflected in the business activities associated with the issuance of Business Identification Number (NIB) through the Online Single Submission Ris-based Approach (OSS-RBA) system in the Pemutih Beach ares, Pecatu Village, Badung Regency, raising questions regarding the comformity of licensing system with the applicable spatial planning regulations. this study is intended to analyze the harmonization between the regulation of Risl-based Business Licensing and the Bali Provincial Spatial Plan in protecting conservation areas, as well as to examine the consistency among Goverment Regulation No. 5 of 2021, Goverment Regulation No. 21 of 2021, and Bali Provinsiap Regulation No. 2 of 2023 in ensuring legal certainly a normative legal research method using both the statutory approach and the conseptual approach, with qualitative analysis based on library research. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the harmonization of business licensing plicies and spatial planning regulations in order to ensure legal certaintywhile safeguarding protectedareas as part of sustainable development
URGENSI PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI TERHADAP TANAH YANG BELUM BERSERTIFIKAT DI INDONESIA Ni Komang Pramudiasari; I Kadek Dony Hartawan; Ni Komang Irma Adi Sukmaningsih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis Vol 6 No 3 (2026): Juli, Jurnal Hukum Sui Generis
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study focuses on evaluating the legal framework of the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) for uncertified land in Indonesia and formulating an ideal regulatory model to ensure legal protection and certainty for all parties involved. The primary driver of this research is the lack of specific regulations governing PPJB on uncertified land, which forces its practical implementation to rely merely on general contract law, overall agrarian provisions, and customary notarial practices. This circumstance creates a normative void that risks causing inconsistent procedures and legal disputes. Utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches, this normative legal research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources through qualitative examination. Findings reveal that current Indonesian laws do not comprehensively govern PPJB for uncertified land, leaving its enforceability dependent strictly on the freedom of contract principle under the Civil Code. Consequently, dedicated regulations are urgently required to define the legal standing of PPJB, land eligibility standards, mandatory contractual terms, notarial duty of care, protections for good-faith buyers, and dispute resolution channels. Such legislation is expected to establish legal certainty, procedural uniformity, and enhanced legal safeguards.
Co-Authors Catharina Jean Sinaga Gina Sonia Kafiar I Kadek Dony Hartawan Komang Cahyaniarsa Suryaningrat Komang Febrinayanti Dantes Ni Kadek Febri Dewi Tirani Ni Komang Merlinda Putri Ni Komang Pramudiasari Ni Luh Eka Puspita Ni Luh Yossi Shuartini Millenia Ni Putu Ega Parwati Putu Riski Ananda Kusuma