Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Global Strategis Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks Sadar Wisata: Jurnal Pariwisata Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Fachrurreza, Ahmad Mujaddid
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Tourism Research in Bali (2020-2025) Ningsih, Sabda; Fachrurreza, Ahmad Mujaddid
Sadar Wisata: Jurnal Pariwisata Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Sadar Wisata: Jurnal Pariwisata
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/sw.v8i1.3065

Abstract

This study aimed to extend the previous research conducted by Yospetch and Nimsai, as well as Kawuryan, concerning the global prominence of sustainable tourism research in Asia and Indonesia. The novelty of this study lay in its specific focus on sustainable tourism in Bali, a region with a longstanding history in tourism management. A relational bibliometric analysis was employed to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationships between metadata and analytical units, using tools such as PoP, Mendeley Desktop, and VOSviewer. From an analysis of 16 Scopus-indexed academic publications, three key findings were identified. First, a new research theme emerged between 2020 and 2025, namely the evaluation of government policy frameworks in relation to sustainable tourism. Second, the limited global visibility of research on sustainable tourism in Bali was attributed to the lack of international collaboration and the restricted diversity of keywords employed. Third, a discernible shift was observed in the dominant research themes between the periods 2010-2019 and 2020-2025. This thematic transition indicated potential avenues for future scholarly inquiry that could offer greater significance and impact within the international academic community.
The Advocacy Strategy of The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) for Temporary Rights to Work for Refugees under The Australia’s ‘Balancing Act' Fachrurreza, Ahmad Mujaddid; Nihayati, Arina; Larasati
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v22i1.411

Abstract

The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the important actor in advocating for temporary work rightsfor refugees amid the complexity of Australian asylum policy. This study analyses RCOA’s advocacystrategies in responding to asylum policy restrictions, particularly through the constructivist approachthat emphasises the importance of discourse and social norms. Using the qualitative methods throughthe document analysis of policy papers, public campaigns, and submissions to the government, this study adopts the advocacy strategy framework to examine how the RCOA operates in a policy environment shaped by the “balancing act” between the border security and humanitarian obligations. The research findings show that RCOA utilises the evidence-based lobbying, coalition building, and public engagementto drive policy change and reframe the narration around the refugees. Despite facing structural andpolitical barriers, RCOA’s advocacy contributes to increased public awareness and opens up space formore inclusive policy discussions. This study highlights the important role of civil society in advocating for refugee rights through approaches based on the dignity, social inclusion, and economic contribution.
China’s Pragmatic Appropriation of Global South Narrative Fachrurreza, Ahmad Mujaddid; Ningsih, Sabda; Yunazwardi, Muhammad Iqbal
Global Strategis Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): Global Strategis
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jgs.20.1.2026.23-46

Abstract

The revival of Global South studies in International Relations signifies a major transformation in contemporary global dynamics. This article addresses the question of how China appropriates the Global South narrative and how this shift reflects both coloniality of power and heterarchy of power. Using a discourse analysis approach, the study examines official speeches, policy documents, and global initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), BRICS, and the G77+China. The findings demonstrate that China employs South-South solidarity rhetoric to position itself as the leader of the Global South, yet in practice reproduces coloniality by creating new forms of dependency. Furthermore, the contemporary Global South reveals a heterarchical structure, where emerging powers such as China dominate smaller states. This indicates a shift in the meaning of the Global South: from the Bandung Spirit’s emancipatory ethos of anti-imperialism toward a pragmatic economic-political bloc driven by national interests. Thus, the revival of the Global South is paradoxical: it offers new opportunities for multipolarity among developing countries, while simultaneously undermining the emancipatory ideals of solidarity and equality that once defined the Bandung Spirit. Keywords: Global South; Bandung Spirit; China; Coloniality of Power; Heterarchy of Power Kebangkitan kembali kajian Global South dalam studi Hubungan Internasional menandai transformasi penting dalam dinamika global kontemporer. Artikel ini berangkat dari pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana China mengapropriasi wacana Global South dan bagaimana pergeseran makna ini mencerminkan kolonialitas dan heterarki kuasa. Dengan menggunakan metode analisis wacana, penelitian ini menelaah pidato resmi, dokumen kebijakan, serta inisiatif global seperti Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), BRICS, dan G77+China. Temuan pada penelitian menunjukkan bahwa China menggunakan retorika solidaritas selatan untuk memosisikan dirinya sebagai pemimpin Global South, namun praktiknya mereproduksi logika kolonialitas dengan menciptakan relasi ketergantungan baru. Selain itu, Global South kontemporer memperlihatkan struktur heterarki emerging powers seperti China menempati posisi dominan atas negara-negara kecil. Hal ini mengindikasikan adanya pergeseran makna Global South: dari spirit emansipatoris Bandung yang menolak imperialisme, menuju blok ekonomi-politik pragmatis yang sarat kepentingan nasional China. Dengan demikian, kebangkitan Global South bersifat paradoksal: membuka ruang multipolaritas baru bagi negara-negara berkembang, tetapi sekaligus mengikis nilai-nilai emansipasi dan kesetaraan yang menjadi fondasi Bandung Spirit. Kata-kata Kunci: Global South; Bandung Spirit; China; Kolonialitas Kekuasaan; Heterarki Kekuasaan
South Korean Cities as Norm-Bearing Actors in Migrant Protection: A Paradiplomatic Analysis of Sub-National Cooperation with Indonesia Fachrurreza, Ahmad Mujaddid; Khofifah, Aprilia Erinda Sinta; Nugroho, Dimas Adi
Journal of Paradiplomacy and City Networks Vol. 5 No. 1: June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jpcn.v5i1.140

Abstract

Despite growing interest in paradiplomacy, the role of cities in advancing migrant protection norms remained underexplored. This study examined how the South Korean cities of Ansan, Busan, and Incheon functioned as norm bearing actors in migration governance through subnational cooperation with Indonesian local governments. The study was important because it explored how cities contributed to the localization and implementation of migrant protection beyond state centered approaches. A qualitative case study approach was employed using policy documents, municipal government reports, migrant support center publications, and secondary institutional sources from Indonesia and South Korea. The analysis examined how international migrant protection principles were interpreted and translated into local governance practices. The findings identified three interconnected dimensions of city level action. First, the cities recognized migrants as rights bearing residents rather than temporary workers. Second, they established localized support mechanisms, including multilingual counseling, healthcare services, and community-based welfare programs. Third, they strengthened migrant protection through intercity cooperation and transnational policy learning. The study concluded that South Korean cities contributed to migrant protection by embedding international norms into local governance despite their limited formal authority. Their role complemented national migration policies while demonstrating the growing importance of subnational actors in multilevel migration governance.
Co-Authors Dimas Adi Nugroho Khofifah, Aprilia Erinda Sinta Larasati Nihayati, Arina Ningsih, Sabda Yunazwardi, Muhammad Iqbal