Iman Sejati Zendrato
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection or Perpetrators of Crimes With the Element of Self-Defense Iman Sejati Zendrato; Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih; Fauzan Fauzan
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i1.306

Abstract

Legal protection is an effort made by the government to protect its citizens in accordance with legal regulations that aim to realize justice, legal certainty, and benefits. The application of law is a system that aims to regulate and protect every action or behavior that occurs within the scope of society with various norms and sanctions that are binding and coercive in order to prevent problems from occurring. Every person who commits a crime will certainly be held accountable in the form of sanctions for the violations committed. In this writing process, the normative legal research method or normative juridical method is used using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. A crime in general can also be caused by actions or deeds that are not directly carried out with an element of intent in the form of protection or self-defense. Accountability for criminal acts on the basis of self-defense in this case can be justified as long as it meets the requirements and limitations according to legal provisions. Thus, self-defense efforts in the criminal act process cannot be punished if they meet the elements of self-protection because there is no way out, meet the unlawful nature, for the benefit of oneself, others and public order issues, and do not go against the norms that live in society.
APPLICATION OF ANTIMONOPOLY LAWS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BUSINESS COMPETITION IN THE DIGITAL MARKET Heri Enjang Syahputra; Rolando Marpaung; Roberto Roy Purba; Parlindungan Purba; Iman Sejati Zendrato
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v2i1.32

Abstract

Law Number 5 of 1999 states the definition of monopoly, namely a form of control over the production and/or marketing of goods and/or use of certain services by one actor or one group of business actors. What is meant by business actor is every individual or business entity, whether in the form of a legal entity or non-legal entity which is established and domiciled or carries out activities within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Indonesia, either individually or jointly through an agreement, carrying out various business activities. in the field of economics. The aim of this research is to find out how the law applies to monopolies and its impact on business competition in the digital market. To find out the sanctions applied to business monopolists in the digital market and to find out what are the solutions to prevent business competition in the digital market. The data analysis method used in this research is quantitative analysis. The approach in this research is carried out by examining legal sources from conditions that occur in society that has entered the digital economic era. Research development was carried out in the era of regulations governing business competition that were in effect in Indonesia, and also the policy stakeholders involved in this implementation. Conclusion: The application of anti-monopoly law and its impact on business competition in the digital market is that competition in the business world is an absolute requirement or imperative for the implementation of a market economy. Therefore, the KPPU is aware of the importance of law enforcement in the digital economy era. KPPU is an independent body that cannot be influenced by any party, the Government or other parties who have a conflict of interest, in processing, deciding or investigating a case.