Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Hukum Urgensi Digitalisasi di Desa Delima Kecamatan Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat (Legal Outreach on the Urgency of Digitalization in Delima Village, Tebing Tinggi District, Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency) davega, adeb; Meri Yarni; Nova Bela Dhyta; Ana Ramadhona
Journal Of Rural Community Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No. 2 (2024) : Oktober 2024
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jrcd.v1i2.14

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas kegiatan pengabdian mengenai Urgensi Digitalisisasi bagi Pemerintah Desa. Target sasaran pada pengabdian ini adalah Pemerintah Desa Delima Kecamatan Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat Provinsi Jambi. Metode yang digunakan adalah penyuluhan hukum melalui ceramah, diskusi, dan tanya jawab. Tujuan dari penyuluhan hukum ini adalah untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan pemerintah desa tentang pentingnya digitalisasi dalam pelaksanaan pemerintahan desa, serta mencari solusi dalam permasalahan yang mungkin muncul. Harapannya, penyuluhan hukum ini mampu memberikan masukan kepada pemerintah desa dalam pelaksanaan tugas, kewajiban hak dan kewenangan yang dimiliki dengan lebih efisien, efektif dan transparan. Sehingga tiga komponen utama yaitu wilayah desa, masyarakat desa, dan pemerintahan desa dalam menjalankan fungsinya guna mencapai tujuan pemerintahan desa. Dengan pemahaman akan pentingnya digitalisasi oleh pemerintah desa, maka kompetensi pemerintah desa dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa pun akan meningkat.
JUDICIAL DISPARITIES IN LEGAL INTERPRETATION: THE APPLICATION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW IN MARRIAGE DISPENSATION RULINGS Kurniawan, Ardian; Dedi Sumanto; Ana Ramadhona; Hendri. K
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss2.art1

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the disparity in judicial interpretations and the application of legal progressivism in marriage dispensation decisions at the Muara Bulian Religious Court. This study seeks to explore how judges construct legal reasoning when faced with applications for underage marriage dispensation and whether their decisions reflect consistency or divergence in applying child protection principles. Methods - This study employs a socio-legal approach with qualitative methods. Data were obtained from case decisions, field observations, and interviews with judges at the Muara Bulian Religious Court. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns of judicial interpretation and the extent of progressivism in the rulings’ content. Findings - The results reveal a disparity in judges’ interpretations, particularly regarding the use of progressive legal reasoning. Some judges strictly adhere to statutory provisions, while others accommodate sociocultural considerations and parental requests, resulting in inconsistent outcomes. Although progressive legal theory provides opportunities for child protection, in practice, dispensations are often granted, thereby reinforcing early marriage practices instead of preventing them. Contribution/Limitation of Research: This study contributes to the discourse on judicial discretion and progressive legal thought in the context of family law adjudication. However, it is limited to the Muara Bulian Religious Court; thus, its findings cannot be generalized to all religious courts in Indonesia. Originality/Value - This study highlights the tension between statutory child protection norms and judicial discretion in marriage dispensation cases. It offers a critical socio-legal perspective on how progressivism is interpreted and practiced at the local courts.