Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains HEALTHY: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan RechtIdee
Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
Universitas Islam Nusantara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Revisiting Law Enforcement against Revenge Porn Offenders in Cyberspace Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6469

Abstract

The development of digital technology has increased the threat of cybercrime, including revenge porn, which has a broad impact on victims, psychologically, socially and economically. Although Indonesia already has regulations such as the ITE Law and the Pornography Law, these regulations have not been fully effective in ensnaring perpetrators and providing maximum protection for victims. Meanwhile, other countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States have more specific regulations in dealing with revenge porn. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement against revenge porn in Indonesia and provide recommendations for improving regulations to increase victim protection. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory and comparative approach, which involves analyzing national and international regulations, as well as reviewing court decisions and reports from various institutions. The results show that Indonesian regulations still have gaps in dealing with revenge porn, especially in the aspects of victim protection, content removal mechanisms, and sanctions for perpetrators and digital platforms. Therefore, more progressive legal reforms are needed, including the implementation of the right to be forgotten, increasing sanctions for perpetrators.
Legal Protection for Cyberbullying Victims Through Social Engineering in Cybercrime Rizky Wijayanto; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri; Yan Nurcahya; Arba'iyah Mohd Noor
RechtIdee Vol 20, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v20i2.32443

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has created a new space for interaction through digital media, bringing not only benefits but also various forms of cybercrime, one of which is cyberbullying. This phenomenon is increasingly complex when carried out through social engineering techniques, namely the psychological manipulation of victims to obtain information, instill fear, or pressure them mentally and socially. Social engineering-based cyberbullying not only impacts the victim's psychological aspects but also causes social, reputational, and even economic losses. This article aims to analyze the forms of cyberbullying that use social engineering and examine the legal protections available to victims within the cyber law framework in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, which examines related regulations, such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Criminal Code, and other relevant regulations. The results of the study indicate that although positive legal instruments have provided a basis for protection for victims of cyberbullying, regulations related to social engineering are still implicit and have not been specifically regulated. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, improve digital literacy, and adopt an integrated preventive and repressive approach to ensure effective legal protection for victims of cyberbullying in the digital era.
Rekonstruksi Paradigma Hukum Pidana Kesehatan: Analisis Pembaruan Regulasi Berbasis UU No. 17 Tahun 2023 Dan Kuhp Baru Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Medis Dan Pasien: Reconstruction of the Criminal Law Paradigm in Health: Analysis of Regulatory Updates Based on Law No. 17 of 2023 and the New Criminal Code in an Effort to Legally Protect Medical Personnel and Patients Yudhi Hertanto; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 9 No. 5: Mei 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v9i5.10523

Abstract

Pembaruan hukum pidana di Indonesia, telah memasuki babak baru dengan disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 (KUHP Baru) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam implikasi dari kedua regulasi tersebut, terhadap penegakan hukum pidana di sektor kesehatan, khususnya terkait delimitasi antara risiko medis dan kelalaian pidana. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka (library research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integrasi prinsip keadilan restoratif (restorative justice) dalam UU Kesehatan terbaru, memberikan perlindungan hukum yang lebih seimbang bagi tenaga medis melalui mekanisme mediasi sebelum memasuki ranah peradilan. Tetapi, proses sinkronisasi operasional dengan KUHP Baru masih menghadapi tantangan pada aspek pembuktian unsur kelalaian (culpa). Artikel ini merekomendasikan adanya pedoman teknis yang lebih rigid bagi aparat penegak hukum, untuk menghindari kriminalisasi profesi medis tanpa mengabaikan hak konstitusional pasien atas keselamatan.
ANALISIS LEGALITAS DAN ETIKA RESOURCE RATIONING DALAM ALOKASI SUMBER DAYA JAMINAN KESEHATAN NASIONAL: PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM TENAGA MEDIS Yudhi Hertanto; Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
HEALTHY : Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/healthy.v5i3.12810

Abstract

The National Health Insurance (JKN) program in Indonesia faces significant challenges in the form of limited fiscal resources and infrastructure, which trigger the practice of resource rationing. This article aims to evaluate the legal and ethical dimensions of these restrictions through the perspective of distributive justice, the sociological impact on vulnerable groups, and legal certainty for medical personnel. This research uses a juridical-normative method with a descriptive-qualitative approach. The results show that rationing practices are often carried out implicitly through mechanisms of denial, selection, delay, deterrence, deflection, and dilution to balance claim ratios exceeding 100%. Philosophically, there is a tension between the utilitarian paradigm, which prioritizes the stability of collective systems, and John Rawls's theory of justice, which demands priority protection for the most disadvantaged groups. Legally, although Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Ministerial Regulation Number 6 of 2024 have provided a framework for minimum service standards (SPM), legal protection for medical personnel in making difficult decisions in the field still requires more explicit and transparent clinical guidelines. ABSTRAK Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) di Indonesia, menghadapi tantangan besar berupa keterbatasan sumber daya fiscal, dan infrastruktur yang memicu praktik resource rationing. Artikel ini bertujuan, untuk mengevaluasi dimensi legalitas dan etika dari pembatasan tersebut, melalui perspektif keadilan distributif, dampak sosiologis pada kelompok rentan, serta kepastian hukum bagi tenaga medis. Riset ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif, dengan pendekatan deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik rationing sering kali dilakukan secara implisit melalui mekanisme denial, selection, delay, deterrence, deflection, dan dilution guna menyeimbangkan rasio klaim yang melampaui 100%. Secara filosofis, terdapat ketegangan antara paradigma utilitarianisme yang mengutamakan stabilitas sistem kolektif, dengan teori keadilan John Rawls yang menuntut perlindungan prioritas bagi kelompok paling tidak beruntung. Secara yuridis, meskipun Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan dan Permenkes Nomor 6 Tahun 2024 telah memberikan kerangka standar pelayanan minimal (SPM), namun proteksi hukum bagi tenaga medis dalam pengambilan keputusan sulit di lapangan, masih memerlukan pedoman klinis yang lebih eksplisit dan transparan.    
Co-Authors Arba'iyah Mohd Noor Rizky Wijayanto Yan Nurcahya Yudhi Hertanto Yudhi Hertanto