Ahmad Saprudin
Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis perbandingan konsep perjanjian menurut kitab undang-undang hukum perdata (KUHPERDATA) dan akad menurut Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES) Farhan Asyhadi; Lia Amaliya; Ahmad Saprudin
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i1.1495

Abstract

Perjanjian merupakan salah satu aspek fundamental dalam hukum yang mengatur hubungan antara individu atau entitas. Dalam konteks hukum Indonesia, dua sumber utama yang mengatur perjanjian adalah Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) dan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan memahami perbedaan serta persamaan dalam pengaturan perjanjian dan akad, serta implikasinya terhadap praktik hukum dan ekonomi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan studi hukum normatif. Teknik penelitiannya adalah pendekatan peraturan-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata yang menyatakan bahwa suatu perjanjian harus memuat kesepakatan, kecakapan, hal-hal tertentu, dan alasan-alasan yang sah, sesuai dengan hasil penelitian ini. Akan tetapi, syarat-syarat dan keadaan-keadaan perjanjian tersebut dijelaskan dalam Pasal 22 KHES. Ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut meliputi para pihak, kesepakatan, tujuan, dan sasaran utama perjanjian. Berbeda dengan 15 asas hukum perjanjian yang terdapat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Pasal 21 KHES menyebutkan 17 asas perjanjian. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa secara keseluruhan, perbedaan dalam syarat dan kriteria hukum antara KUHPerdata dan KHES menunjukkan bahwa kedua sistem hukum memiliki pendekatan yang berbeda dalam pengaturan perjanjian, yang dapat mempengaruhi praktik hukum dan ekonomi di Indonesia.
Analysis Of The Application Of The Principle Of Pacta Sunt Servanda In Judges' Decisions On Debt Disputes Based On Unwritten Agreements Lia Amaliya; Farhan Asyhadi; Ahmad Saprudin
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Unwritten debt agreements can cause various problems in the future. One of them is uncertainty regarding the contents of the agreement. One of the most fundamental principles in contract law is the principle of pacta sunt servanda or the principle of legal certainty. This principle relates to the consequences of the agreement. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal provisions related to debts made unwritten based on contract law and to determine the judge's considerations in applying the principle of pacta sunt servanda to debt disputes based on unwritten agreements. This study uses a normative juridical research type. The conclusion in this study is that a valid agreement is an agreement that has fulfilled the requirements for a valid agreement in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code and will have legal consequences for the parties who made it. One of the legal consequences that binds the parties is Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code which relates to the principle of Pacta sunt servanda.  
Wakaf Properties Used As Guarantee For Debt Are Reviewed In Law Number 41 Of 2004 Concerning Wakaf And The Compilation Of Islamic Law Farhan Asyhadi; Lia Amaliya; Ahmad Saprudin
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land is one of the most common objects used as collateral. Waqf will be valid as a continuous charity after the owner truly declares the assets he has donated to be public assets and he freezes his rights for the benefit of the community. The identification of the problem in this study is How is the view of Islamic Law and Law Number 41 of 2004 regarding waqf assets used as collateral for debt? As well as the Legal Consequences of waqf land used as collateral According to Law Number 41 of 2004 The methodology used in this study uses normative juridical, The conclusion of this study is based on Article 40 of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf that waqf assets are prohibited from being used as collateral, confiscated, donated, sold, inherited, exchanged, transferred in other forms of transfer of rights. And in Article 225 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, objects that have been donated cannot be changed or used other than those intended in the waqf pledge. The agreement with collateral in the form of waqf land does not meet the requirements for a lawful cause, thus the agreement is null and void by law. The criminal provisions are regulated in Article 67 of Law No. 41 of 2004.