Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa pada Teks Opini dalam Website Apakabarnusantara.com Edisi November 2024 sebagai Sumber Bacaan bagi Siswa Kelas XII SMA Ilma Khalisatul Muntaha; Dhesti Lestari; Linda Selviana; Rahmazeni Ainun Zulfaa; Ana Widya Pratiwi; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo; Deby Luriawati Naryatmojo; Irfai Fathurohman
PUSTAKA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : BADAN PENERBIT STIEPARI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/pustaka.v5i3.3265

Abstract

The use of language in everyday life often goes wrong. Good and correct language use significantly affects a person's reading process. Quality writing adheres to proper linguistic rules. However, many language errors are often found in written texts. This study aims to analyze language errors in opinion texts published in the November 2024 edition of the apakabarnusantara.com website. Another purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the opinion texts on the website are suitable as reading material for 12th-grade high school students, helping them understand proper language use in opinion writing to enhance their language skills. The methods used in this study are qualitative descriptive analysis and a syntactic approach as the theoretical framework. Data were collected by reading several relevant references and recording information that could be used as data. The analysis of this study revealed the use of non-standard words in both texts, such as the word mempengaruhi, which is a common misspelling of the correct form memengaruhi in Indonesian. Both words translate to influence in English, but only memengaruhi is considered standard. Another example includes the use of foreign terms such as best practice. In terms of coherence, the analysis found sentences that introduced new information abruptly, rather than reinforcing the previous ideas. Logical sentence structure was also an issue, as some sentences lacked clarity and failed to convey a clear message to the reader. Additionally, there were ineffective sentences due to the repetition of the same words. This research aims to provide deeper insight into language errors in opinion texts and to promote a better understanding of how to write opinion pieces using correct and appropriate language rules.
Praanggapan pada Teks Cerpen dalam Website ruangsastra.com Edisi Agustus 2025 Ilma Khalisatul Muntaha; Dhesti Lestari; Linda Selviana; Rahmazeni Ainun Zulfaa; Ana Widya Pratiwi; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo; Arum Yuliya Lestari
Perspektif : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Bahasa Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret : Perspektif : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Bahasa
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/perspektif.v4i1.2964

Abstract

This study aims to describe the forms and types of presuppositions found in two short stories published on the website ruangsastra.com, namely “Minum Teh Sebelum Mati” (“Drinking Tea Before Dying”) and “Pendongeng Keliling dan Tangisan Peluru” (“The Traveling Storyteller and the Cry of Bullets”). This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with an objective and pragmatic approach. Data were collected using the observation and note-taking method, then analyzed using distributional and referential analysis techniques. The results of the study show that a total of 32 presuppositions were identified and classified into six types, theory: existential, factive, structural, non-factive, lexical, and counterfactual presuppositions. Among these types, existential presuppositions were the most frequently found in the texts, while counterfactual presuppositions were the least common. These findings indicate that the use of presuppositions in short stories serves not only as a linguistic feature but also as an essential tool in constructing meaning and understanding narrative context. This research is expected to make a significant contribution to the development of pragmatic studies, particularly in the analysis of modern literary works, as well as to open new perspectives in understanding the interaction between language, meaning, and context in literary texts. The implications of this study may also serve as a foundation for further research on other pragmatic aspects in broader and more diverse literary works.