Nasoetion, Dedi Wardana
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Rechtsvinding

Implementation of the Rights of Justice Collaborators to Get Reduced Sentences in the Crime of Murder Putra, Dany Ardiansah; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Nasoetion, Dedi Wardana
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1423

Abstract

The concept of a Justice Collaborator (JC) has become an important instrument in criminal law enforcement, particularly in uncovering complex crimes. A justice collaborator refers to a perpetrator who cooperates with law enforcement authorities by providing significant information to reveal a criminal act and identify other perpetrators. In Indonesia, the recognition of justice collaborators is regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 as amended by Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, as well as Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2011. This study examines the implementation of the rights of justice collaborators to obtain sentence reduction in cases of murder and analyzes the legal considerations applied by judges in granting such leniency. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of relevant laws and regulations, while secondary materials include legal doctrines and scholarly articles. The data are analyzed qualitatively through descriptive analysis. The results indicate that although justice collaborators are legally entitled to special protection and the possibility of sentence reduction, their implementation in murder cases is not automatic and depends heavily on judicial discretion. Judges consider several factors, including the significance of the information provided, the role of the offender in the crime, and the consistency of cooperation during the investigation and trial process. The study concludes that clearer legal standards and consistent judicial application are necessary to ensure legal certainty and fairness in granting sentence reductions to justice collaborators in murder cases.
The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Tipiring Cases as an Effort to Reduce Suspects in Detention Kurniawan, Dani; Nasoetion, Dedi Wardana; Borman, M. Syahrul
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1438

Abstract

This study examines the application of restorative justice in handling minor criminal offenses as an effort to reduce the number of detainees in detention centers. The current handling of minor offenses in Indonesia is often considered disproportionate, as imprisonment is frequently imposed despite the relatively small impact of such crimes. This situation contributes to overcrowding in correctional institutions and increases the burden on the criminal justice system. Restorative justice offers an alternative approach that emphasizes dialogue, mediation, and reconciliation between the offender and the victim in order to restore the social relationship that has been disrupted by the crime. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing relevant laws, regulations, and legal literature concerning the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia. The findings indicate that restorative justice can provide a more effective, humane, and efficient solution in resolving minor criminal cases. Through this approach, victims can obtain compensation and a sense of justice, while offenders are given the opportunity to take responsibility and reintegrate into society without the negative stigma of imprisonment. Therefore, restorative justice can serve as an important instrument in reducing the number of detainees and improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in Indonesia