Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Teks Esai pada Laman mojok.co Edisi Maret 2025 sebagai Bahan Bacaan dan Informasi bagi Siswa SMA Aprillia Puspita Sari; Sisya Nirmala Meida; Khairunnisa Ardhana; Al Mujahidatul Adilah; Afia Ananta Izmi; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo; Riri Kumalasari; Antonius Edi Nugroho
Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): November: Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/semantik.v3i4.2290

Abstract

This article analyzes language errors in essays written by high school students and published on the Mojok.co website in the March 2025 edition. It employs a descriptive qualitative approach with purposive sampling. Five essays were selected based on topic relevance and language difficulty levels appropriate for high school students. The analysis reveals language errors in four main categories: spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation. Spelling errors are the most frequent, involving incorrect word forms that deviate from standard Indonesian spelling conventions, such as improper capitalization and the use of numerals where they are inappropriate. Grammar errors include issues in sentence structure, particularly in the incorrect placement of subjects and predicates. Diction errors often involve the use of inaccurate or informal vocabulary, while punctuation errors are evident in the misuse or misplacement of commas and periods. These findings suggest that students’ language proficiency in essay writing still requires improvement. To enhance their skills, the following recommendations are proposed: increasing students’ understanding of spelling, grammar, diction, and punctuation based on the General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling; providing structured and continuous writing practice; incorporating technology such as spell checkers and grammar tools; and fostering an understanding of language variations, especially the differences between spoken and written language. Improving students’ writing skills is essential, as language errors can impede effective communication and undermine a writer’s credibility. This article aims to serve as a reference for both teachers and students in recognizing common writing errors and enhancing the overall quality of student essays.
Tindak Tutur Representatif pada Video Konsep Dasar Memahami Manusia dalam Platform YouTube Cania Citta Aprillia Puspita Sari; Khairunnisa Ardhana; Fadla Cahya Salsabila; Intan Puspita Listyani; Sisya Nirmala Meida; Tiara Dihas Sapuri; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo
Bhinneka: Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan dan Bahasa Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Bhinneka
Publisher : Universitas Palan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/bhinneka.v4i2.1621

Abstract

This research aims to describe the forms and functions of representative speech acts found in the YouTube video “The Basic Concept of Understanding Humans” by Cania Citta. The study arises from the phenomenon of digital communication, which demonstrates a shift in speech patterns from merely delivering information to constructing intellectual discourse that is both reflective and argumentative. A descriptive qualitative method with a pragmatic approach was employed. The data, consisting of representative utterances, were collected through observation and note-taking techniques on video transcripts, then analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which involves data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the dominant representative speech acts include stating, explaining, reporting, concluding, and speculating. Each utterance functions not only to convey information but also to build rational argumentation and foster critical awareness among audiences regarding the concept of humanity. Illocutionarily, these utterances perform informative, argumentative, and reflective functions, emphasizing the speaker’s epistemic responsibility toward the truth of the propositions delivered. The perlocutionary effects include an increased interest and heightened critical awareness among audiences concerning philosophical issues about human nature. This study contributes to the development of pragmatic studies, particularly in understanding the role of language as an instrument of knowledge and persuasion in digital media.