Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

FREE NUTRITIOUS SCHOOL MEAL PROGRAMS IN INDONESIA AND THE NETHERLANDS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL FOUNDATIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: PROGRAM MAKANAN BERGIZI GRATIS DI SEKOLAH INDONESIA DAN BELANDA: ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN LANDASAN HUKUM DAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL Mulyosudarmo, Suviana Suwoto; Cornelis, Vieta Imelda; Siregar, Fritz Edward; P, Siti Marwiyah; Prawesthi, Wahyu
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v4i2.123

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and risks of the Free Nutritious Food policy implementation in Indonesia and the Netherlands. In addition, the researcher also compares the findings with the experiences of a number of developed countries that have previously implemented similar policies, in order to assess the extent to which this policy can be adapted in Indonesia. The approach used in this research is normative legal research, which examines legislation, policy documents, and relevant academic literature as the basis for preparing legal arguments related to the feasibility and impact of the program. The focus of the analysis lies on the compatibility of the free lunch policy with the national legal framework, including the identification of the need for regulatory reform if necessary. Through this comparative study, the research also highlights institutional readiness and public support as crucial factors in ensuring the sustainability of the program. The results are expected to provide policy recommendations that are not only socially and economically contextualized, but also aligned with Indonesia's legal system and support the national development agenda.
PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH ORGANIK DI KELURAHAN TAMBAK SARIOSO KOTA SURABAYA MELALUI INOVASI ECO ENZYME Cornelis, Vieta Imelda; Sucipto, Sucipto; Damayanti, Sri Sukmana; Sidarta, Dudik Djaja; Baruno, Agustiawan Djoko; Ayu Chyntia, Desak Nyoman; Kayla Natasha, Amanda; Rohman Bulu, Akbar Taufiqur; Mulyosudarmo, Suviana Suwoto; Rahmah, Nabila Aliya
Batara Wisnu : Indonesian Journal of Community Services Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Batara Wisnu | September - Desember 2025
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bw.v5i3.470

Abstract

Household organic waste management remains a serious problem in urban areas, including in Tambak Sarioso Village, Surabaya City. The high volume of organic waste, low level of waste sorting at source, and limited community participation indicate a gap between normative regulations and the implementation of waste management policies. This condition necessitates research, considering that waste management is directly related to environmental protection and the fulfillment of the community's right to a healthy environment. This study aims to analyze the empirical conditions of organic waste management in Tambak Sarioso Village and to examine the implementation of eco-enzymes as a community empowerment strategy within the legal framework of waste management. The main research question focuses on the effectiveness of eco-enzymes in bridging legal norms and social practices of household-based organic waste management. The results show that organic waste management in Tambak Sarioso is not yet optimal due to low legal awareness and limited supporting facilities. The implementation of eco-enzymes has been proven to increase community participation, reduce organic waste generation, and improve the quality of the residential environment. These findings contribute to strengthening the concept of community empowerment as an instrument of environmental law effectiveness. The research conclusion confirms that eco-enzymes are an innovative model of community-based organic waste management that is relevant for strengthening the implementation of waste policies. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of empirical, normative, and community empowerment approaches into a single framework of sustainable waste management.
Reconstructing the Constitutional Boundaries of the Noken Electoral System in Papua: Customary Consensus and Electoral Integrity Siregar, Fritz Edward; Mulyosudarmo, Suviana Suwoto
SASI Vol 32 No 4: Volume 32 Issue 4, December 2026 (Issue in Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i4.4072

Abstract

Introduction: The Noken electoral system represents a distinctive form of customary electoral practice in Papua that has been accommodated within Indonesia's constitutional and electoral framework. Its communal decision-making mechanism, however, raises questions concerning individual suffrage, electoral equality, ballot secrecy, and electoral integrity. Purposes of the Research: This study examines the constitutional status of the Noken electoral system and determines the legal boundaries for reconciling customary communal consensus with the principles of constitutional democracy. Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution, electoral regulations, and Constitutional Court decisions concerning the Noken system, complemented by scholarly literature on customary law, legal pluralism, and deliberative democracy. The materials are analyzed through qualitative legal interpretation and constitutional harmonization. Results of the Research: The study finds that constitutional recognition of the Noken system cannot be understood as an unconditional exemption from electoral principles. Its legitimacy depends on the continuing existence of genuine customary consensus and its compatibility with constitutional rights and electoral integrity. The study proposes a conditional accommodation model based on territorial continuity, authentic communal deliberation, informed and voluntary participation, documented consensus, independent electoral supervision, and effective remedies against coercion and manipulation. Conclusion: The Noken system may be constitutionally accommodated as a form of legal pluralism, but its application requires enforceable legal boundaries. Where customary consensus is demonstrably replaced by coercion, vote buying, or systematic manipulation, the state should activate a legally defined transition mechanism toward the standard voting system.