Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PANDANGAN ULAMA MU’TABAR TENTANG 3 ULAMA SUFI (IBN AROBI, AL-HALLAJ DAN SYEKH SITI JENAR) Wardi, Miftahussa’adah; Muhibuddin, Muhibuddin; Abidin, Idrus; Masluchah, Lulu; Rahman, Deni; Arafah, Mudrikatul; Mansyur, Anaway Irianti
Al-Idaroh: Media Pemikiran Manajemen Dakwah Vol 5 No 2 (2025): September Al-idaroh
Publisher : Program Studi Manajemen Dakwah Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Azhaar Lubuklinggau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53888/alidaroh.v5i2.880

Abstract

This study aims to examine three major Sufi figures in the Islamic Sufi tradition, namely Ibn Arabi, Al-Hallaj, and Sheikh Siti Jenar, and the views of mu'tabar (trusted) scholars on their teachings and thoughts. This research uses a library research method with a descriptive-analytical approach. This method aims to explore in-depth the views of key figures relevant to the research topic—the views of scholars on three controversial Sufi figures: Ibn Arobi, Al-Hallaj, and Sheikh Siti Jenar. These three figures have had a significant influence on the development of Islamic mysticism, although their teachings are often seen as controversial. Ibn Arabi, with the concept of wahdat al-wujud (unity of existence), taught that everything in the universe is a manifestation of God, which can only be understood through inner search and spiritual awareness. His teachings on the unity of God and creation made a major contribution to Sufi thought, although it has been criticized by some circles because it is considered to have theological consequences that contradict mainstream Islamic teachings.
Demonstrasi Minoritas Muslim Dalam Berdakwah di Negeri Non-Muslim Abidin, Idrus; Majid, Zamaksyari Abdul; Nurhaidah, Siti Nuri; Akbar, Muhammad Yudi Ali; Hayatuddin, Hayatuddin; Evalinda, Evalinda; Hamid, Lallo
Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan Vol 16 No 2 (2024): Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Pendidikan
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47435/al-qalam.v16i2.3349

Abstract

This research analyzes how demonstrations are viewed by contemporary Muslim intellectuals. The research method is based on a qualitative approach with a literature study basis. Primary references use recent studies with a number of pros and cons that have occurred between the main supporters (Ikhwanul Muslimin) and those who strongly oppose it (Madkhaliyah). Secondary references use indirectly related research. The research findings show that there are 4 characteristics of Muslim-majority countries that need to be differentiated concerning the law of demonstrations: (1) Muslim-majority countries that adopt the principle of shura in their political system. Demonstrations are considered haram because of the principle of obedience to the government as long as it does not involve disobedience to God. (2) Muslim-majority countries that adopt the principle of democracy. Demonstrations are allowed, even recommended or obligatory, as long as they do not aim to annul the government. (3) Occupied Muslim-majority countries. Demonstrations in occupied Muslim-majority countries, such as intifada actions and the like, are considered obligatory. The obligation is not limited to demonstrations but extends to jihad, both defensive and offensive. (4) Demonstrations in non-Muslim countries are considered permissible as long as they do not create problems for the Muslim minority.