Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Paradoks Kemakmuran: Perbandingan Sistem Otoritarisme Negara Singapura dan Myanmar Nisa, Bella Saidah Hoerul; Putri, Shezy Solevina; Syabani, Rahmah Nur; Erlina, Dewi; Pebriani, Dinda; Nurlia, Elly
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 9 (2025): Oktober 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17514503

Abstract

Comparative political studies confront a fundamental paradox: the similarity of authoritarian systems between two countries does not guarantee identical economic outcomes. In Southeast Asia, Singapore (implementing an authoritarian system, lacking natural resources but prosperous) and Myanmar (implementing an authoritarian system, rich in natural resources but experiencing economic crisis) are two examples. This study aims to analyze the disparity in economic outcomes using Douglass North's institutional theory. This study employed a qualitative method with a case study approach, and data collection was conducted through literature review. The findings suggest that Myanmar implements a hard authoritarianism (extractive state) where informal institutions (military patronage and kleptocracy) cripple formal institutions, creating destructive incentives. Conversely, Singapore implements a soft authoritarianism (developmental state) where informal institutions (meritocracy and anti-corruption) strengthen pro-market formal institutions, encouraging productive investment. Thus, the primary determinant behind the extreme disparity in prosperity between these two countries is not the type of political regime but rather the quality and congruence of institutions.
Konversi Modal dan Agensi Transpuan: Analisis Teori Pierre Bourdieu terhadap Eksistensi Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Yogyakarta Erlina, Dewi; Nur Sya'bani, Rahmah; Arinia Indriyany, Ika
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora dan Seni Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Maret - April
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jishs.v4i5.4571

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the existence of the Al-Fatah Transgender Islamic Boarding School in Yogyakarta through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social practice, with a focus on the dynamics of capital conversion and transgender agency. The central issue in this study is how marginalized groups, who often face religious and social exclusion, are able to maintain their living space amidst the dominance of patriarchal structures and religious conservatism. The method used is descriptive qualitative research, employing an in-depth literature review of various academic discourses on the relationship between gender and religion. The findings reveal that the existence of the Al-Fatah Islamic Boarding School is driven by the students’ success in converting cultural capital—specifically, inclusive theological knowledge—and social capital from advocacy networks into symbolic capital that legitimizes them as a religious student community. The agency formed through the accumulation of this capital enables transgender women to subvert the symbolic domination of society, while simultaneously negotiating their civic rights and access to worship independently and with dignity.