Prihandono, Yoga
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Redefining the Statute of Limitations in Document Forgery Cases: Implications for Legal Certainty and Criminal Investigations Aprilianto, Sapta; Prihandono, Yoga; Nugraha, Xavier; Fuady, Muhammad Ikram Nur
Media Iuris Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v8i3.76259

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 118/PUU-XX/2022 redefined the paradigm of the statute of limitations for document forgery offenses in Indonesia. Previously calculated from the date of the offense, it is now determined based on when the forged document is discovered, used, and causes loss. This article examines the legal implications of the court decision on the state of limitations to legal certainty and law enforcement practices, particularly those carried out by the Indonesian National Police. A conceptual and statutory approach is employed to analyze the amendments to Article 79(1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Court’s legal reasoning. The findings indicate that this change enhances legal protection for victims and requires investigators to cumulatively evaluate the elements of “discovery,” “usage,” and “loss” to determine the statute of limitations. The decision has erga omnes effect and serves as a binding precedent and guideline for investigating document forgery cases in Indonesia.
Revocation of Land Gifts for Breach of Filial Responsibility: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and India Sharon, Grace; Mohamad, Ani Munirah; Nugraha, Xavier; Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya; Prihandono, Yoga
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January-June 2025
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v5i1.53695

Abstract

The transfer of land rights through gifts within familial relationships often entails obligations of filial responsibility, particularly the duty of children to care for their elderly parents. As the increasing disputes over property transfers within familial relationships, this study addresses the legal grounds and consequences of revoking land gift agreements in Indonesia and India when recipients fail to fulfil their filial obligations. So the urgency of the results of this research can help to renew civil law in Indonesia, in particular, and add to the literature as a more general research concept. This article is a normative legal research methodology with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal a doctrinal divergence: Indonesian law mandates explicit conditions within the gift deed to allow revocation based on filial neglect, emphasising a textual interpretation under Article 1688 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Conversely, Indian law, notably through Article 23 of the Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, recognises both explicit and implicit filial duties as valid grounds for annulment, facilitating broader judicial protection for elderly donors. The study highlights the restrictive scope of Indonesian legal enforcement compared to the more flexible, purposive judicial approach in India, which prioritises substantive justice and familial welfare. These insights suggest that Indonesian legal reforms could benefit from adopting similar flexibility to strengthen safeguards for elderly parents, mitigate intra-family conflicts, and ensure equitable intergenerational property transfers, because the similarity between Indonesia and India is the application of a legal system influenced by customary law.